Strategies and evaluation underpinning the implementation of suicide prevention training: a systematic review

被引:2
作者
Putri, Adelia Khrisna [1 ,2 ]
Mcgrath, Martina [1 ]
Batchelor, Rachel [3 ]
Ross, Victoria [4 ]
Krysinska, Karolina [1 ]
Hawgood, Jacinta [4 ]
Kolves, Kairi [4 ]
Reifels, Lennart [1 ]
Pirkis, Jane [1 ]
Andriessen, Karl [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Mental Hlth & Community Wellbeing, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Gadjah Mada, Fac Psychol, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
[3] Univ Oxford, Oxford Inst Clin Psychol Training & Res, Oxford, England
[4] Griffith Univ, Australian Inst Suicide Res & Prevent, Sch Appl Psychol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
Suicide prevention training; Implementation; Evaluation; Systematic review; HEALTH; INTERVENTION; PERSPECTIVES; KNOWLEDGE; AWARENESS; FIDELITY; PROGRAM; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-025-21999-8
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundSuicide prevention training programs can enhance the capacity for suicide prevention by improving the attitudes and comprehension of individuals regarding suicide and increasing their skills in supporting a suicidal person. However, little is known about how training programs are implemented and how implementation is assessed. Thus, our review aims to identify the strategies and evaluation methods underpinning the implementation of suicide prevention training programs.MethodsThe systematic review adhered to the PRISMA guidelines and involved searches in MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, PsycINFO, EBM Reviews, Scopus, and a forward and backward citation search following the full-text screening. Eligible studies (n = 28) reported the implementation strategy or implementation evaluation of a suicide prevention training program (PROSPERO #CRD42021288621).ResultsThe implementation strategies varied among three categories of training programs. Gatekeeper training predominantly utilized a train-the-trainer format and collaborations with stakeholders. Professional development training focused more on establishing supportive organizational infrastructure and extended post-training supervision. School-based curriculum training programs emphasized the distribution of educational materials and role-play activities. Surveys were the primary evaluation method, often complemented by interviews, observations, progress tracking, or focus groups. Evaluations primarily assessed acceptability, fidelity, and feasibility.ConclusionWhile certain training categories tend to employ specific strategies and evaluation measures more frequently than others, stakeholder collaboration, assessing content relevance, and follow-up supervision could be valuable across training programs. Tailored strategies may cater for groups with varying levels of knowledge and training in suicide prevention to enhance acceptability and feasibility. Future research should evaluate approaches that facilitate adoption and sustainability of suicide prevention training programs.
引用
收藏
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Utilisation and application of implementation science in complex suicide prevention interventions: A systematic review [J].
Krishnamoorthy, Sadhvi ;
Mathieu, Sharna ;
Armstrong, Gregory ;
Ross, Victoria ;
Francis, Jillian ;
Reifels, Lennart ;
Kolves, Kairi .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2023, 330 :57-73
[22]   Strategies for Enhancing the Implementation of Universal Mental Health Prevention Programs in Schools: A Systematic Review [J].
Baffsky, Rachel ;
Ivers, Rebecca ;
Cullen, Patricia ;
Wang, Jessica ;
McGillivray, Lauren ;
Torok, Michelle .
PREVENTION SCIENCE, 2023, 24 (02) :337-352
[23]   Implementation strategies and outcomes of school-based programs for adolescent suicide prevention: A scoping review protocol [J].
Vargas, Belen ;
Martinez, Pablo ;
Mac-Ginty, Scarlett ;
Hoffmann, Tamara ;
Martinez, Vania .
PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (05)
[24]   Data Linkage Strategies to Advance Youth Suicide Prevention: A Systematic Review for a National Institutes of Health Pathways to Prevention Workshop [J].
Wilcox, Holly C. ;
Kharrazi, Hadi ;
Wilson, Renee F. ;
Musci, Rashelle J. ;
Susukida, Ryoko ;
Gharghabi, Fardad ;
Zhang, Allen ;
Wissow, Lawrence ;
Robinson, Karen A. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 165 (11) :779-+
[25]   The effectiveness of QPR suicide prevention training [J].
Aldrich, Rosalie S. ;
Wilde, Jerry ;
Miller, Elizabeth .
HEALTH EDUCATION JOURNAL, 2018, 77 (08) :964-977
[26]   General practitioners training about suicide prevention and risk: A systematic review of literature [J].
Audouard-Marzin, Youna ;
Kopp-Bigault, Celine ;
Scouarnec, Pauline ;
Walter, Michel .
PRESSE MEDICALE, 2019, 48 (7-8) :767-779
[27]   Immediate Impact of a Brief Suicide Prevention Training for Veteran Volunteers [J].
Lapidos, Adrienne ;
Spinner, Jane ;
Garlick, James ;
Kees, Michelle .
PEDAGOGY IN HEALTH PROMOTION, 2023, 9 (01) :27-33
[28]   Facilitators and barriers to implementation of suicide prevention interventions: Scoping review [J].
Kasal, Alexandr ;
Taborska, Roksana ;
Jurikova, Laura ;
Grabenhofer-Eggerth, Alexander ;
Pichler, Michaela ;
Gruber, Beate ;
Tomaskova, Hana ;
Niederkrotenthaler, Thomas .
CAMBRIDGE PRISMS-GLOBAL MENTAL HEALTH, 2023, 10
[29]   Freely Available Training Videos for Suicide Prevention: Scoping Review [J].
Wislocki, Katherine ;
Jager-Hyman, Shari ;
Brady, Megan ;
Weiss, Michal ;
Schaechter, Temma ;
Khazanov, Gabriela ;
Young, Sophia ;
Becker-Haimes, Emily .
JMIR MENTAL HEALTH, 2023, 10
[30]   Implementation strategies for telemental health: a systematic review [J].
Rebecca Appleton ;
Phoebe Barnett ;
Norha Vera San Juan ;
Elizabeth Tuudah ;
Natasha Lyons ;
Jennie Parker ;
Emily Roxburgh ;
Spyros Spyridonidis ;
Millie Tamworth ;
Minnie Worden ;
Melisa Yilmaz ;
Nick Sevdalis ;
Brynmor Lloyd-Evans ;
Justin J. Needle ;
Sonia Johnson .
BMC Health Services Research, 23