Comparative analysis of different machine learning algorithms for urban footprint extraction in diverse urban contexts using high-resolution remote sensing imagery

被引:0
作者
Gui, Baoling [1 ]
Bhardwaj, Anshuman [1 ]
Sam, Lydia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aberdeen, Kings Coll, Sch Geosci, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, Scotland
关键词
urban footprint mapping; high-resolution remote sensing imagery; machine learning; deep learning; segment anything model; LAND-USE CHANGE; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD CLASSIFICATION; IMPERVIOUS SURFACE; COVER CHANGE; AREAS; SEGMENTATION; ENVIRONMENT; INTEGRATION; CHALLENGES; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1007/s11442-025-2339-y
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
While algorithms have been created for land usage in urban settings, there have been few investigations into the extraction of urban footprint (UF). To address this research gap, the study employs several widely used image classification method classified into three categories to evaluate their segmentation capabilities for extracting UF across eight cities. The results indicate that pixel-based methods only excel in clear urban environments, and their overall accuracy is not consistently high. RF and SVM perform well but lack stability in object-based UF extraction, influenced by feature selection and classifier performance. Deep learning enhances feature extraction but requires powerful computing and faces challenges with complex urban layouts. SAM excels in medium-sized urban areas but falters in intricate layouts. Integrating traditional and deep learning methods optimizes UF extraction, balancing accuracy and processing efficiency. Future research should focus on adapting algorithms for diverse urban landscapes to enhance UF extraction accuracy and applicability.
引用
收藏
页码:664 / 696
页数:33
相关论文
共 89 条
  • [1] Alberti M., Booth D., Hill K., Et al., The impact of urban patterns on aquatic ecosystems: An empirical analysis in Puget lowland sub-basins, Landscape and Urban Planning, 80, pp. 345-361, (2007)
  • [2] Baker M.E., Weller D.E., Jordan T.E., Comparison of automated watershed delineations, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 72, pp. 159-168, (2006)
  • [3] Barman P., Mustak S.K., Mapping urban footprint using machine learning and public domain datasets, Advanced Remote Sensing for Urban and Landscape Ecology, pp. 299-317, (2023)
  • [4] Bau D., Zhou B., Khosla A., Et al., Network dissection: Quantifying interpretability of deep visual representations, (2017)
  • [5] Belgiu M., Dragut L., Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 114, pp. 24-31, (2016)
  • [6] Bolch T., Buchroithner M.F., Kunert A., Et al., Automated delineation of debris-covered glaciers based on ASTER data, Geoinformation in Europe, Proceedings of the 27th EARSeL Symposium, pp. 4-6, (2007)
  • [7] Chen H., Shi Z., A spatial-temporal attention-based method and a new dataset for remote sensing image change detection, Remote Sensing, 12, (2020)
  • [8] Chen J., Xia M., Wang D., Et al., Double branch parallel network for segmentation of buildings and waters in remote sensing images, Remote Sensing, 15, (2023)
  • [9] Chen J.J., Lu W., Lou J., Automatic concrete defect detection and reconstruction by aligning aerial images onto semantic-rich building information model, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 38, pp. 1079-1098, (2023)
  • [10] Chen L.-C., Papandreou G., Schroff F., Et al., Rethinking atrous convolution for semantic image segmentation, (2017)