Pressure Cycling of Suction Buckets in Clay

被引:0
|
作者
Mani, Senthen Amuthan [1 ,2 ]
O'Loughlin, Conleth [2 ]
Bienen, Britta [2 ]
机构
[1] Fugro Australia Pty Ltd, 1060 Hay St, Perth, WA 6005, Australia
[2] Univ Western Australia, Sch Earth & Oceans, Ctr Offshore Fdn Syst, 35 Stirling Hwy, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Suction bucket; Clay; Pressure cycles; Offshore wind; Cyclic installation; Cone penetration test; DESIGN PROCEDURES; INSTALLATION; CAISSONS; TESTS; PILES; RESISTANCE; CAPACITY;
D O I
10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-12458
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Suction buckets are being increasingly considered as foundations for offshore wind turbines, as they can be installed by pumping water from the interior of the bucket, minimizing acoustic emissions. A key design consideration is ensuring that the bucket can be installed under suction pressures that do not cause cavitation or structural buckling. Pressure cycling may be employed during installation in an attempt to reduce the required suction pressure. This involves reversing the pump flow intermittently to cause vertical displacement cycles with the intent that this will degrade the frictional resistance at the skirt/soil interface. This paper considers the effectiveness of this approach in clay seabeds through experiments at model scale in a geotechnical centrifuge and using data obtained at full scale at a site in the North Sea. The data indicate that although one-way pressure cycles are ineffective, two-way pressure cycles can reduce the required suction pressure significantly. A simple model is outlined that extends calculation approaches for monotonic installation by including an interface strength reduction factor established from cyclic cone penetrometer test data. This model is shown to provide good agreement with field installation records and provides support to the use of cyclic cone penetrometer tests in offshore site investigation for developments where pressure-cycled suction bucket installations may be required.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EVALUATION OF THE VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL UNDRAINED BEARING CAPACITES OF SUCTION BUCKETS FOR WIND TURBINES IN CLAY
    Chi Hung Le
    Kim, Sungryul
    Oh, Myounghak
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APAC 2011, 2012,
  • [2] Pressure-Cycled Installation of Suction Buckets in Sand and Layered Soil Profiles
    Mani, Senthen Amuthan
    Bienen, Britta
    O'Loughlin, Conleth D.
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2025, 151 (01)
  • [3] Suction contribution to uplift capacity of suction buckets under serviceability conditions
    Huang, Zhen
    Shi, Li
    Cai, Yuanqiang
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2023, 283
  • [4] FIELD INSTALLATION TESTS OF MONOPOD SUCTION PILE AND TRIPOD SUCTION BUCKETS
    Kwag, D.
    Oh, Myounghak
    Kwon, OSoon
    Bang, S.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 32ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING - 2013 - VOL 6, 2013,
  • [5] Osmotic suction pressure of wetted mixture of clay and feldspar
    Yamaguchi, S
    Yang, J
    Iwase, Y
    Kawasaki, H
    Yamamoto, T
    '96 CHINA-JAPAN SYMPOSIUM ON PARTICUOLOGY, PROCEEDINGS, 1996, : 475 - 480
  • [6] Solution to critical suction pressure of penetrating suction caissons into clay using limit analysis
    Wu, Yuqi
    Zhang, Yu
    Li, Dayong
    APPLIED OCEAN RESEARCH, 2020, 101
  • [7] On the Behaviour of Suction Buckets under Cyclic Lateral Loads
    Tasan, H. Ercan
    BAUINGENIEUR, 2016, 91 : 496 - 505
  • [8] On the behavior of suction buckets in sand under tensile loads
    Thieken, Klaus
    Achmus, Martin
    Schroeder, Christian
    COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2014, 60 : 88 - 100
  • [9] Stochastic modeling of geometric imperfections for buckling analysis of suction buckets
    Boehm, M.
    Schaumann, P.
    EERA DEEPWIND OFFSHORE WIND R&D CONFERENCE, DEEPWIND 2022, 2022, 2362
  • [10] Comparison of numerical formulations for the modeling of tensile loaded suction buckets
    Sorensen, E. S.
    Clausen, J.
    Damkilde, L.
    COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2017, 83 : 198 - 208