Artificial intelligence assessment of tissue-dissection efficiency in laparoscopic colorectal surgery

被引:0
|
作者
Nakajima, Kei [1 ,2 ]
Takenaka, Shin [1 ]
Kitaguchi, Daichi [1 ]
Tanaka, Atsuki [1 ]
Ryu, Kyoko [1 ]
Takeshita, Nobuyoshi [1 ]
Kinugasa, Yusuke [2 ]
Ito, Masaaki [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Ctr Hosp East, Surg Device Innovat Off, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 2778577, Japan
[2] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, 1-5-45 Yushima,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138510, Japan
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Tissue dissection; Laparoscopic colorectal surgery; Monopolar device; Automated skill assessment model; NATIONAL-TRAINING-PROGRAM; PSYCHOMOTOR-SKILLS; SURGICAL SKILL; SYSTEM; TOOL;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-025-03641-8
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Several surgical-skill assessment tools emphasize the importance of efficient tissue-dissection, whose assessment relies on human judgment and is thus subject to bias. Automated assessment may help solve this problem. This study aimed to verify the feasibility of surgical-skill assessment using a deep learning-based recognition model. Methods This retrospective study used multicenter intraoperative videos of laparoscopic colorectal surgery (sigmoidectomy or high anterior resection) for colorectal cancer obtained from 766 cases across Japan. Three groups with different skill levels were distinguished: high-, intermediate-, and low-skill. We developed a model to recognize tissue dissection by the monopolar device using deep learning-based computer-vision technology. Tissue-dissection time per monopolar device appearance time (efficient-dissection time ratio) was extracted as a quantitative parameter describing efficient dissection. We automatically measured the efficient-dissection time ratio using the recognition model of 8 surgical instruments and tissue-dissection on/off classification model. The efficient-dissection time ratio was compared among groups; the feasibility of distinguishing them was explored using the model. The model-calculated parameters were evaluated to determine whether they could differentiate high-, intermediate-, and low-skill groups. Results The tissue-dissection recognition model had an overall accuracy of 0.91. There was a moderate correlation (0.542; 95% confidence interval, 0.288-0.724; P < 0.001) between manually and automatically measured efficient-dissection time ratios. Efficient-dissection time ratios by this model were significantly higher in the high-skill than in intermediate-skill (P = 0.0081) and low-skill (P = 0.0249) groups. Conclusion An automated efficient-dissection assessment model using a monopolar device was constructed with a feasible automated skill-assessment method.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Assessment methods in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review of available instruments
    van Zwieten, Tom
    Okkema, Sietske
    van Det, Marc
    Pereboom, Ilona
    Veeger, Nic
    Pierie, Jean-Pierre
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2023, 38 (01)
  • [12] Artificial Intelligence in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Present and Future Perspectives
    Quero, Giuseppe
    Mascagni, Pietro
    Kolbinger, Fiona R.
    Fiorillo, Claudio
    De Sio, Davide
    Longo, Fabio
    Schena, Carlo Alberto
    Laterza, Vito
    Rosa, Fausto
    Menghi, Roberta
    Papa, Valerio
    Tondolo, Vincenzo
    Cina, Caterina
    Distler, Marius
    Weitz, Juergen
    Speidel, Stefanie
    Padoy, Nicolas
    Alfieri, Sergio
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (15)
  • [13] Artificial intelligence as a prediction tool for orthognathic surgery assessment
    de Oliveira, Pedro Henrique Jose
    Li, Tengfei
    Li, Haoyue
    Goncalves, Joao Roberto
    Santos-Pinto, Ary
    Gandini, Luiz Gonzaga
    Cevidanes, Lucia Soares
    Toyama, Claudia
    Feltrin, Guilherme Paladini
    Campanha, Antonio Augusto
    de Oliveira, Melchiades Alves
    Bianchi, Jonas
    ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2024, 27 (05) : 785 - 794
  • [14] Artificial intelligence in colorectal surgery: an AI-powered systematic review
    A. Spinelli
    F. M. Carrano
    M. E. Laino
    M. Andreozzi
    G. Koleth
    C. Hassan
    A. Repici
    M. Chand
    V. Savevski
    G. Pellino
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2023, 27 : 615 - 629
  • [15] Artificial intelligence in colorectal surgery: an AI-powered systematic review
    Spinelli, A.
    Carrano, F. M.
    Laino, M. E.
    Andreozzi, M.
    Koleth, G.
    Hassan, C.
    Repici, A.
    Chand, M.
    Savevski, V.
    Pellino, G.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2023, 27 (08) : 615 - 629
  • [16] Artificial Intelligence-Based Assessment of Colorectal Polyp Histology by Elastic-Scattering Spectroscopy
    Rodriguez-Diaz, Eladio
    Jepeal, Lisa I.
    Baffy, Gyorgy
    Lo, Wai-Kit
    Mashimo, Hiroshi
    A'amar, Ousama
    Bigio, Irving J.
    Singh, Satish K.
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2022, 67 (02) : 613 - 621
  • [17] Technical skill assessment in minimally invasive surgery using artificial intelligence: a systematic review
    Pedrett, Romina
    Mascagni, Pietro
    Beldi, Guido
    Padoy, Nicolas
    Lavanchy, Joel L.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (10): : 7412 - 7424
  • [18] Current applications of artificial intelligence-based computer vision in laparoscopic surgery
    Guo, Kangwei
    Tao, Haisu
    Zhu, Yilin
    Li, Baihong
    Fang, Chihua
    Qian, Yinling
    Yang, Jian
    LAPAROSCOPIC ENDOSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 6 (03): : 91 - 96
  • [19] A tool-kit for the quantitative assessment of proficiency in laparoscopic colorectal surgery
    Shah, P. R.
    Haray, P. N.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2011, 13 (05) : 576 - 582
  • [20] Objective assessment of technique in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: What are the existing tools?
    Foster, J. D.
    Francis, N. K.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2015, 19 (01) : 1 - 4