Workplace dignity scale in Iranian nurses: translation and psychometric evaluation

被引:0
作者
Khorasanizadeh, MohammadHossein [1 ]
Tagharrobi, Zahra [1 ]
Zare, Mohammad [1 ]
机构
[1] Kashan Univ Med Sci, Trauma Nursing Res Ctr, Kashan, Iran
关键词
Workplace; Dignity; Nurse; Psychometrics; PROFESSIONAL DIGNITY; EXPERIENCES;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-024-11703-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundWorkplace dignity is defined as a person's perception of respect and trust, equal and fair treatment, valuing the person, independence, freedom of expression, and decision-making enjoyed by the employee in the workplace. Therefore, this study aimed to develop the Workplace Dignity Scale (WDS) and evaluate its psychometric properties.MethodsIn this methodological study, WDS was translated based on Beaton et al. Guideline. After assessing face and content validity (using CVI, CVR, modified kappa, and item impact), 250 nurses were selected by random sampling from Kashan hospitals in 2023. Then, WDS was assessed through expletory factor analysis (EFA), known-groups comparison, internal consistency, and stability. The ceiling and floor effects were also examined. Data were analyzed using SPSS v16 by Kruskal-Wallis test, Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's Omega, interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimum detectable changes (MDC).ResultsThe scale's CVI, CVR, and modified kappa were above 0.79. Item impact was higher than 1.5. EFA extracted three factors, including "general dignity, respect, and indignity", that could explain 70.6% of the total variance in scale. WDS could differentiate between the three groups in terms of occupation satisfaction status. Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's Omega, ICC, SEM, and STC of scale were 0.949, 0.950, 0.970, 2.793, and 7.742, respectively.ConclusionThe Persian version of the WDS has shown validity and reliability for measuring workplace dignity among nurses in the Iranian context.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Critical Values for Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio: Revisiting the Original Methods of Calculation
    Ayre, Colin
    Scally, Andrew John
    [J]. MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION IN COUNSELING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 47 (01) : 79 - 86
  • [2] Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures
    Beaton, DE
    Bombardier, C
    Guillemin, F
    Ferraz, MB
    [J]. SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) : 3186 - 3191
  • [3] Nurses' professional dignity in private health care: a descriptive phenomenological study
    Combrinck, Y.
    van Wyk, N. C.
    Mogale, R. S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL NURSING REVIEW, 2020, 67 (03) : 395 - 402
  • [4] Ebadi A., 2016, Jame'e Negar, P105
  • [5] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Patient Dignity Inventory
    Eskigulek, Yasemin
    Kav, Sultan
    [J]. PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2022, 20 (03) : 389 - 396
  • [6] COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures
    Gagnier, Joel J.
    Lai, Jianyu
    Mokkink, Lidwine B.
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (08) : 2197 - 2218
  • [7] Kalafatolu MR., 2021, Turkish Psychol Couns Guidance J, V11, P281
  • [8] Development and psychometric evaluation of perceived clinical nurses' professional dignity scale: a sequential-exploratory mixed-method study
    Khachian, Alice
    Ebadi, Abbas
    Mardani-Hamooleh, Marjan
    Bagheri, Hosein
    Abbasi, Ali
    [J]. BMC NURSING, 2023, 22 (01)
  • [9] Nurses' experiences of violation of their dignity
    Khademi, Mojgan
    Mohammadi, Eesa
    Vanaki, Zohreh
    [J]. NURSING ETHICS, 2012, 19 (03) : 328 - 340
  • [10] Lucas K., 2017, The International Encyclopedia of Organizational Communication, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1002/9781118955567.WBIEOC222, 10.1002/9781118955567.wbieoc222]