Visual and patient-reported outcomes of an enhanced versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Fernandez, Joaquin [1 ]
Ribeiro, Filomena [2 ,3 ]
Burguera, Noemi [1 ]
Rodriguez-Calvo-de-Mora, Marina [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Rodriguez-Vallejo, Manuel [1 ]
机构
[1] VITHAS Almeria Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Qvision, Almeria, Spain
[2] Hosp Luz, Dept Oftalmol, Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Univ Lisbon, Fac Med, Lisbon, Portugal
[4] Vithas Malaga, Ophthalmol Dept, Malaga, Spain
[5] Hosp Reg Univ Malaga, Plaza Hosp Civil, Malaga, Spain
来源
关键词
INTERMEDIATE VISION; DEFOCUS CURVES; ACUITY; IOL; GUIDANCE; STANDARD; DEPTH; BIAS;
D O I
10.1038/s41433-025-03625-4
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Understanding the functional outcomes achieved with new enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) is crucial for adequately managing patient expectations. This study evaluated visual and patient-reported outcomes of an enhanced range of field IOL versus other monofocal IOLs in cataract patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis, pre-registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024561611), included studies from Medline (PubMed), Embase (Ovid), and trial registries (2019-2024) focused on binocular cataract surgeries with various IOL models. Primary outcomes assessed were monocular distance-corrected visual acuities (CDVA, DCIVA, DCNVA), defocus curves, and contrast sensitivity; secondary measures included binocular visual acuities and patient-reported outcomes such as spectacle independence and photic phenomena. Out of 31 studies (8 randomized clinical trials, 23 case series), high-certainty evidence indicated no significant difference in CDVA between enhanced and conventional IOLs. However, enhanced IOLs demonstrated better intermediate (DCIVA: -0.11 logMAR, CI 95%: -0.13 to -0.10) and near (DCNVA: -0.12 logMAR, CI 95%: -0.17 to -0.07) visual acuities, supported by defocus curves, though with lower-certainty evidence. No significant differences were observed in contrast sensitivity or photic phenomena, and evidence for positive dysphotopsia was moderate to low. Enhanced IOLs significantly favored intermediate-distance spectacle independence, with an odds ratio of 7.85 (CI 95%: 4.08-15.09), though no differences were observed for distance spectacle independence. Near-distance spectacle independence also favored enhanced IOLs, though with low-certainty evidence. In summary, enhanced IOLs provide improved intermediate and near visual acuities compared to conventional monofocal IOLs, though further studies are needed to confirm outcomes in contrast sensitivity and patient-reported outcomes across various enhanced monofocal IOLs.
引用
收藏
页码:883 / 898
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2019, Current version of RoB 2
  • [2] Clinical evaluation of a new monofocal IOL with enhanced intermediate function in patients with cataract
    Auffarth, Gerd U.
    Gerl, Matthias
    Tsai, Linda
    Janakiraman, D. Priya
    Jackson, Beth
    Alarcon, Aixa
    Dick, H. Burkhard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 47 (02) : 184 - 191
  • [3] OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF A BANK CORRELATION TEST FOR PUBLICATION BIAS
    BEGG, CB
    MAZUMDAR, M
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1994, 50 (04) : 1088 - 1101
  • [4] Comparison of visual performances of enhanced monofocal versus standard monofocal IOLs in a mini-monovision approach
    Beltraminelli, Tim
    Rizzato, Angelica
    Toniolo, Katia
    Galli, Andrea
    Menghini, Moreno
    [J]. BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [5] Borenstein M, 2009, Introduction to meta-analysis, P183
  • [6] Avoiding common mistakes in meta-analysis: Understanding the distinct roles of Q, I-squared, tau-squared, and the prediction interval in reporting heterogeneity
    Borenstein, Michael
    [J]. RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2024, 15 (02) : 354 - 368
  • [7] Clinical outcomes of bilateral implantation of new generation monofocal IOL enhanced for intermediate distance and conventional monofocal IOL in a Korean population
    Choi, Wan Kyu
    Han, Hyo Ji
    Son, Hyeck-Soo
    Khoramnia, Ramin
    Auffarth, Gerd U.
    Choi, Chul Young
    [J]. BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [8] Vision outcomes with a new monofocal IOL
    Cinar, Esat
    Bolu, Hulya
    Erbakan, Gokhan
    Yuce, Berna
    Aslan, Fatih
    Fece, Murat
    Emre, Sinan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 41 (02) : 491 - 498
  • [9] Comparative analysis of visual outcomes with 2 enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses
    Corbelli, Eleonora
    Iuliano, Lorenzo
    Codenotti, Marco
    Fasce, Francesco
    Bandello, Francesco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 49 (09) : 929 - 935
  • [10] Comparative analysis of visual outcome with 3 intraocular lenses: monofocal, enhanced monofocal, and extended depth of focus
    Corbelli, Eleonora
    Iuliano, Lorenzo
    Bandello, Francesco
    Fasce, Francesco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 48 (01) : 67 - 74