Enhancing flood water level prediction through transfer learning with warmup learning rate scheduling in LSTM models: a comparative case study in Kentucky and Tennessee watersheds

被引:0
作者
Fordjour, George K. [1 ]
Nur, Faria [1 ]
Kalyanapu, Alfred J. [1 ]
Cervone, Guido [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tennessee Technol Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Cookeville, TN 38505 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Geog, GeoInformat & Earth Observat Lab, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Penn State Univ, Inst CyberScience, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
Transfer learning; Warmup learning rate scheduling; Flood prediction; Deep learning; LSTM; AUTOMATIC CALIBRATION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s40808-024-02211-z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Accurate flood water level prediction is crucial for effective mitigation strategies. However, limited data often hinders the development of robust models. This study explores transfer learning (TL) with warmup learning rate scheduling technique to improve flood prediction using Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models. The study focused on watersheds in the United States with limited data. A well-trained source LSTM model from a Tennessee watershed served as the knowledge base for transfer to two target Kentucky watersheds and one target Tennessee watershed. In a comparative evaluation with multiple locally trained LSTM models within these target watersheds, the TL models achieved better performance across different flood magnitude events (low, medium, high), while requiring less training time due to leveraging pre-trained knowledge. In the first target watershed, Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) reduction was 42.72%, 46.37%, and 82.2% for low, medium, and high flood events, respectively. Similarly, RMSE reductions were also observed in the second target watershed (72.72%, 61.7%, and 64.52%) for low, medium, and high magnitude events, respectively. Finally, while the third watershed showed a decline in performance for the high flood event (12.5% RMSE increase), the TL model slightly performed better than the local models for low and medium flood magnitude events (9% and 3% RMSE decrease). In general, this study highlights the effectiveness of TL with warmup learning rate scheduling technique in LSTM models for flood prediction. This approach not only balances computational efficiency with predictive accuracy but also demonstrates reliable performance across different flood magnitude events, as shown by the statistical significance based on Levene's test.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] Abadi M., 2016, arXiv
  • [2] Aboah A, 2023, J TRANSP ENG A-SYST, V149, DOI [10.1061/JTEPBS.TEENG-7312, 10.1061/jtepbs.teeng-7312]
  • [3] Urban Water Flow and Water Level Prediction Based on Deep Learning
    Assem, Haytham
    Ghariba, Salem
    Makrai, Gabor
    Johnston, Paul
    Gill, Laurence
    Pilla, Francesco
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY IN DATABASES, ECML PKDD 2017, PT III, 2017, 10536 : 317 - 329
  • [4] Atarigiya BD., 2017, SSRN, V4529716, P1
  • [5] Water Level Forecasting Using Deep Learning Time-Series Analysis: A Case Study of Red River of the North
    Atashi, Vida
    Gorji, Hamed Taheri
    Shahabi, Seyed Mojtaba
    Kardan, Ramtin
    Lim, Yeo Howe
    [J]. WATER, 2022, 14 (12)
  • [6] Azunre P., 2021, Transfer learning for natural language processing
  • [7] Transfer learning augmented enhanced memory network models for reference evapotranspiration estimation
    Bedi, Jatin
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2022, 237
  • [8] Bergstra J, 2012, J MACH LEARN RES, V13, P281
  • [9] Brown M.B., 1974, Journal of the American Statistical Association, V69, P364, DOI [10.2307/2004242, DOI 10.1137/1003016]
  • [10] Center for Disaster Philanthropy, 2022, 2022 Central Appalachia Floods