Comparative tracking of Turbinaria conoides and Gelidium elegans for enhanced bioethanol production

被引:0
作者
Ravichandran, M. [2 ]
Merlin, A. D. [3 ]
Muthulaxmi, V. [3 ]
Sowndariya, M. [3 ]
Kumar, T. T. Ajith [4 ]
Manoharadas, S. [5 ]
Ahmad, N. [6 ]
Wahab, R. [7 ]
Tamimi, J. A., I [7 ]
Dineshkumar, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Saveetha Univ, Saveetha Med Coll & Hosp, Saveetha Inst Med & Tech Sci SIMATS, Ctr Global Hlth Res, Chennai 602105, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Vivekanandha Arts & Sci Coll Women, Dept Microbiol, Salem 637303, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Karpagam Acad Higher Educ, Dept Microbiol, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
[4] ICAR Natl Bur Fish Genet Resources, Lucknow 226002, India
[5] King Saud Univ, Dept Bot & Microbiol, Coll Sci, POB 2454, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
[6] King Saud Univ, Coll Sci, Dept Chem, POB 2454, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
[7] King Saud Univ, Dept Zool, Coll Sci, POB 2454, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Bioethanol; Gelidium elegans; Seaweed; Turbinaria conoides; Gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy; Nuclear magnetic resonance; ETHANOL-PRODUCTION; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; SEAWEED; PRETREATMENT; CULTIVATION; HYDROLYSIS; MACROALGAE;
D O I
10.1007/s13762-024-06154-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this study, Turbinaria conoides and Gelidium elegans were evaluated for their potential in bioethanol production. The process involved breaking down the cellulose in these seaweeds into glucose, which was then fermented by Saccharomyces cerevisiae to produce ethanol. The glucose and ethanol yields for T. conoides were 4.3 g kg(-1) and 2.8 g g(-1), respectively, while G. elegans demonstrated higher yields of 9.8 g kg(-1) and 5.2 g g(-1). To optimize the saccharification conditions, various operational factors including temperature, acid concentration, and incubation time were explored to maximize sugar detection. The optimal conditions for T. conoides were identified as 7.5% w/v H2SO4 at 140 degrees C for 45 min, achieving 41.8% dry weight (DW) sugar yield. In contrast, G. elegans achieved a higher sugar yield of 48.5% DW under conditions of 10% w/v H2SO4 at 140 degrees C for 60 min of incubation. Following saccharification, the biomass was subjected to hydrolysis and fermentation, with G. elegans yielding a maximum ethanol concentration of 14.13 gL(-1) in less than 60 h. To confirm the presence of bioethanol, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectroscopy (GC-MS) analysis was performed, identifying and quantifying the bioethanol compounds. Additionally, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectroscopy was employed to verify the structural composition of the bioethanol. The results of this research indicate that bioethanol production from seaweed, particularly G. elegans, is a feasible and promising alternative energy source. G. elegans showed especially favorable results in terms of yield and efficiency. As a renewable and carbon-neutral energy source, bioethanol from these seaweeds could play a pivotal role in future energy systems, contributing to global efforts in mitigating climate change and reducing fossil fuel dependence. This study opens new avenues for research and commercial bioethanol production from marine biomass, fostering a more sustainable and eco-friendly energy future.
引用
收藏
页码:7179 / 7196
页数:18
相关论文
共 82 条
  • [61] Siddhanta AK, 2013, NAT PROD COMMUN, V8, P497
  • [62] A novel sono-assisted acid pretreatment of chili post harvest residue for bioethanol production
    Sindhu, Raveendran
    Binod, Parameswaran
    Pandey, Ashok
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 213 : 58 - 63
  • [63] Cellulosic bioethanol production from Eragrostis airoides Nees grass collected from Northeast India
    Singh, Yengkhom Disco
    [J]. SN APPLIED SCIENCES, 2019, 1 (08):
  • [64] An overview of biofuels policies and industrialization in the major biofuel producing countries
    Su, Yujie
    Zhang, Peidong
    Su, Yuqing
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 50 : 991 - 1003
  • [65] Pretreatment and process optimization of spent seaweed biomass (SSB) for bioethanol production using yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae)
    Sudhakar, M. P.
    Arunkumar, K.
    Perumal, K.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 153 (153) : 456 - 471
  • [66] Syad A N., 2013, Biomed. Prev. Nutr, V3, P139, DOI [10.1016/j.bionut.2012.12.002, DOI 10.1016/J.BIONUT.2012.12.002, DOI 10.1016/J.BI0NUT.2012.12.002]
  • [67] Biogas production generated through continuous digestion of natural and cultivated seaweeds with dairy slurry
    Tabassum, Muhammad Rizwan
    Wall, David M.
    Murphy, Jerry D.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 219 : 228 - 238
  • [68] Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve ethanol and biogas production: A review
    Taherzadeh, Mohammad J.
    Karimi, Keikhosro
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2008, 9 (09) : 1621 - 1651
  • [69] Recent developments in (bio)ethanol conversion to fuels and chemicals over heterogeneous catalysts
    Thangaraj, Baskaran
    Monama, Winnie
    Mohiuddin, Ebrahim
    Mdleleni, Masikana Millan
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 409
  • [70] Umamaheswari A., 2017, BIOENERGETICS, V6, P146