Comparative tracking of Turbinaria conoides and Gelidium elegans for enhanced bioethanol production

被引:0
作者
Ravichandran, M. [2 ]
Merlin, A. D. [3 ]
Muthulaxmi, V. [3 ]
Sowndariya, M. [3 ]
Kumar, T. T. Ajith [4 ]
Manoharadas, S. [5 ]
Ahmad, N. [6 ]
Wahab, R. [7 ]
Tamimi, J. A., I [7 ]
Dineshkumar, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Saveetha Univ, Saveetha Med Coll & Hosp, Saveetha Inst Med & Tech Sci SIMATS, Ctr Global Hlth Res, Chennai 602105, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Vivekanandha Arts & Sci Coll Women, Dept Microbiol, Salem 637303, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Karpagam Acad Higher Educ, Dept Microbiol, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
[4] ICAR Natl Bur Fish Genet Resources, Lucknow 226002, India
[5] King Saud Univ, Dept Bot & Microbiol, Coll Sci, POB 2454, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
[6] King Saud Univ, Coll Sci, Dept Chem, POB 2454, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
[7] King Saud Univ, Dept Zool, Coll Sci, POB 2454, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Bioethanol; Gelidium elegans; Seaweed; Turbinaria conoides; Gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy; Nuclear magnetic resonance; ETHANOL-PRODUCTION; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; SEAWEED; PRETREATMENT; CULTIVATION; HYDROLYSIS; MACROALGAE;
D O I
10.1007/s13762-024-06154-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this study, Turbinaria conoides and Gelidium elegans were evaluated for their potential in bioethanol production. The process involved breaking down the cellulose in these seaweeds into glucose, which was then fermented by Saccharomyces cerevisiae to produce ethanol. The glucose and ethanol yields for T. conoides were 4.3 g kg(-1) and 2.8 g g(-1), respectively, while G. elegans demonstrated higher yields of 9.8 g kg(-1) and 5.2 g g(-1). To optimize the saccharification conditions, various operational factors including temperature, acid concentration, and incubation time were explored to maximize sugar detection. The optimal conditions for T. conoides were identified as 7.5% w/v H2SO4 at 140 degrees C for 45 min, achieving 41.8% dry weight (DW) sugar yield. In contrast, G. elegans achieved a higher sugar yield of 48.5% DW under conditions of 10% w/v H2SO4 at 140 degrees C for 60 min of incubation. Following saccharification, the biomass was subjected to hydrolysis and fermentation, with G. elegans yielding a maximum ethanol concentration of 14.13 gL(-1) in less than 60 h. To confirm the presence of bioethanol, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectroscopy (GC-MS) analysis was performed, identifying and quantifying the bioethanol compounds. Additionally, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectroscopy was employed to verify the structural composition of the bioethanol. The results of this research indicate that bioethanol production from seaweed, particularly G. elegans, is a feasible and promising alternative energy source. G. elegans showed especially favorable results in terms of yield and efficiency. As a renewable and carbon-neutral energy source, bioethanol from these seaweeds could play a pivotal role in future energy systems, contributing to global efforts in mitigating climate change and reducing fossil fuel dependence. This study opens new avenues for research and commercial bioethanol production from marine biomass, fostering a more sustainable and eco-friendly energy future.
引用
收藏
页码:7179 / 7196
页数:18
相关论文
共 82 条
  • [41] Wet oxidation as a pretreatment method for enhancing the enzymatic convertibility of sugarcane bagasse
    Martin, Carlos
    Klinke, Helene B.
    Thomsen, Anne Belinda
    [J]. ENZYME AND MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 40 (03) : 426 - 432
  • [42] Nutrient content of tropical edible seaweeds, Eucheuma cottonii, Caulerpa lentillifera and Sargassum polycystum
    Matanjun, Patricia
    Mohamed, Suhaila
    Mustapha, Noordin M.
    Muhammad, Kharidah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYCOLOGY, 2009, 21 (01) : 75 - 80
  • [43] Comparison of bioethanol production from cultivated versus wild Gracilaria verrucosa and Gracilaria gigas
    Meinita, Maria Dyah Nur
    Marhaeni, Bintang
    Oktaviani, Diyah Fatimah
    Jeong, Gwi-Taek
    Hong, Yong-Ki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYCOLOGY, 2018, 30 (01) : 143 - 147
  • [44] Mohammad Abdul M. S., 2013, Journal of FisheriesSciences.com, V7, P178
  • [45] Mohd Azhar Siti Hajar, 2017, Biochem Biophys Rep, V10, P52, DOI 10.1016/j.bbrep.2017.03.003
  • [46] Murugaiyan K., 2020, INDIA TROP PLANT RES, V7, P684, DOI [10.22271/tpr.2020.v7.i3.086, DOI 10.22271/TPR.2020.V7.I3.086]
  • [47] Metabolic variations in seaweed, Sargassum polycystum samples subjected to different drying methods via 1H NMR-based metabolomics and their bioactivity in diverse solvent extracts
    Nazarudin, Muhammad Farhan
    Paramisparam, Anusha
    Khalid, Nur Afiqah
    Albaz, Maziah Nazihah
    Shahidan, Muhammad Syazwan
    Yasin, Ina Salwany Md
    Isha, Azizul
    Abu Zarin, Mazni
    Aliyu-Paiko, Mohammed
    [J]. ARABIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY, 2020, 13 (11) : 7652 - 7664
  • [48] Quantitative and qualitative saccharide analysis of North Atlantic brown seaweed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and infrared spectroscopy
    Niemi, Calle
    Takahashi, Junko
    Gorzsas, Andras
    Gentili, Francesco G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MACROMOLECULES, 2024, 254
  • [49] A review on potential enzymatic reaction for biofuel production from algae
    Noraini, M. Y.
    Ong, Hwai Chyuan
    Badrul, Mohamed Jan
    Chong, W. T.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 39 : 24 - 34
  • [50] Nutritional composition of edible seaweed Gracilaria changgi
    Norziah, MH
    Ching, CY
    [J]. FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2000, 68 (01) : 69 - 76