Safety and efficacy of transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a prospective randomized controlled trial

被引:1
|
作者
Jiang, Bin [1 ]
Liang, Ping [1 ]
Wu, Yanlei [1 ]
Wang, Wenmin [2 ]
Shen, Liping [1 ]
机构
[1] Haiyan Peoples Hosp, Dept Urol, Jiaxing 314300, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Yangtze River Delta Biol Med Res & Dev Ctr Zhejian, Yangtze Delta Reg Inst, Hangzhou 314006, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Transurethral holmium laser enucleation of prostate; Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate; Baseline characteristics; Safety; Efficacy; Postoperative complications;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-024-03499-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) compared to bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (bTUR-P) in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods A total of 220 BPH patients hospitalized from January 2022 to September 2023 were included in this study. These patients were randomly assigned to HoLEP and bTUR-P groups, with 110 participants in each group. We collected preoperative general information, perioperative data, complications, and postoperative follow-up indicators from both groups of patients. Results The baseline characteristics of patients in both groups were similar, with no statistical significance (P > 0.05). Compared to the bTUR-P group, the HoLEP group exhibited significantly less intraoperative bleeding (P < 0.001), shorter bladder irrigation time (P = 0.002), shorter catheter retention time (P < 0.001), and reduced postoperative hospitalization (P = 0.002). Additionally, the pain score during urination after catheter removal was significantly lower in the HoLEP group (P < 0.001). Postoperative complications occurred in both groups; however, they were less frequent in the HoLEP group (4 cases), primarily consisting of urinary retention and postoperative bleeding. The bTUR-P group experienced more complications (9 cases). Significant reductions in postoperative residual urine volume (RUV) were observed in both groups (P < 0.001). Both groups also showed significant improvements in Quality of Life (QoL) scores and International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS), with the HoLEP group demonstrating a more significant decrease in IPSS (P < 0.001). Conclusion After comprehensive evaluation, HoLEP was superior to bTUR-P in terms of safety and efficacy. Therefore, HoLEP may be a preferable choice for the treatment of BPH.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Prostatic Arterial Embolization versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate-A Prospective, Randomized, and Controlled Clinical Trial
    Gao, Yuan-an
    Huang, Yan
    Zhang, Rui
    Yang, Yu-dong
    Zhang, Qing
    Hou, Min
    Wang, Yi
    RADIOLOGY, 2014, 270 (03) : 920 - 928
  • [22] Efficacy and Safety of Transurethral Enucleation with Bipolar Energy for Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Does Prostate Volume Matter?
    Endo, Yuki
    Shimizu, Hiroyuki
    Akatsuka, Jun
    Minaguchi, Shigehito
    Hasegawa, Hiroya
    Toyama, Yuka
    Suzuki, Yasutomo
    Hamasaki, Tsutomu
    Oki, Mamoru
    Hasegawa, Jun
    Kondo, Yukihiro
    JOURNAL OF NIPPON MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2022, 89 (04) : 436 - 442
  • [23] Comparison of standard transurethral resection, transurethral vapour resection and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for managing benign prostatic hyperplasia of &gt;40 g
    Gupta, N
    Sivaramakrishna
    Kumar, R
    Dogra, PN
    Seth, A
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 97 (01) : 85 - 89
  • [24] Comparison of Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate versus Bipolar Resection of Prostate in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Prospective Interventional Study
    Mulay, Abhirudra
    Ranjan, Pratyush
    Sabale, Vilas
    Bagla, Harsh
    Satav, Vikram
    Ghotankar, Shambhavi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2024, 18 (09) : OC19 - OC22
  • [25] Outcome comparison between Thulium laser enucleation of prostate and transurethral resection of prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
    Hsu, Yi-Ting
    Hsueh, Thomas Y.
    Huang, Andy. C.
    Lai, Yu-Wei
    Hsiao, Yi-Chun
    Chiu, Allen W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 29 : 23 - 23
  • [26] BIPOLAR ENUCLEATION OF THE PROSTATE (BIPOLEP) VERSUS TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED NON-INFERIORITY TRIAL
    Pallauf, Maximilian
    Ramesmayer, Christian
    Abenhardt, Michael
    Horetzky, Maximilian
    Griessner, Hubert
    Oberhammer, Lukas
    Drerup, Martin
    Herrmann, Thomas R. W.
    Lusuardi, Lukas
    Kunit, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E327 - E328
  • [27] A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing efficacy of hybrid bipolar transurethral vaporization and resection of prostate with bipolar transurethral resection of prostate (TURP)
    Chau, K. F.
    Yee, C. H.
    Chan, C. K.
    Chan, Eddie S. Y.
    Hou, S. M.
    Ng, C. F.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 113 : 13 - 13
  • [28] Laser ablation of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia
    Chahal, R
    Sundaram, SK
    UROLOGY, 2000, 56 (03) : 546 - 547
  • [29] Randomized trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of prostate with plasmakinetic enucleation of prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
    Neill, Mischel G.
    Gilling, Peter J.
    Kennett, Katie M.
    Frampton, Christopher M.
    Westenberg, Andre M.
    Fraundorfer, Mark R.
    Wilson, Liam C.
    UROLOGY, 2006, 68 (05) : 1020 - 1024
  • [30] Transurethral prostate enucleation with 2 μm laser in treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
    郭和清
    China Medical Abstracts(Surgery), 2011, 20 (04) : 250 - 251