Comparison of PSOX (paclitaxel, oxaliplatin, S-1) and SOX (oxaliplatin, S-1) as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II-III gastric cancer

被引:1
作者
Wang, Fei-Yu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Huang, Xiang-Ming [4 ]
Cao, Yu-Qing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cao, Jie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Song, Meng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fang, Zhi-Jun [4 ,5 ]
Huang, Xin-En [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Nanjing 210009, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangsu Canc Hosp, Nanjing 210009, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangsu Inst Canc Res, Nanjing 210009, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Univ Chinese Med, Affiliated Hosp Integrated Tradit Chinese & Wester, Dept Oncol, Nanjing 210028, Peoples R China
[5] Jiangsu Prov Acad Tradit Chinese Med, Nanjing 210028, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Gastric cancer; Gastrectomy; Adjuvant chemotherapy; Paclitaxel; Oxaliplatin; S-1; OPEN-LABEL; PHASE-III; CAPECITABINE; SURVIVAL; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1186/s12957-025-03723-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundAdjuvant chemotherapy is the conventional treatment for stage II and III gastric cancer(GC). Postoperative doublet chemotherapy has consistently shown improved survival outcomes in advanced-stage GC patients compared to single-agent regimens. Triplet regimens have shown significant survival benefits in the perioperative settings. This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel/S-1/oxaliplatin (PSOX) compared to S-1/oxaliplatin (SOX) as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II-III GC patients following D2 gastrectomy.MethodsA retrospective review was conducted on patients with histologically confirmed stage II-III gastric cancer who underwent D2 gastrectomy at Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, categorizing them into two groups. A total of 75 patients were included in PSOX group and 81 patients in the SOX group between April 2018 and August 2021. Patients in PSOX group received paclitaxel (120 mg/m2), oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2) and S-1 (80 - 60 mg/d) per cycle, while those patients in SOX group were administrated oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2) and S-1 (80-120 mg/d) per cycle. Patients from both groups were matched in a 1:1 ratio using propensity scores to assess differences in disease-free survival (DFS) and safety.ResultsThe 3-year DFS rate was 78.2% for the PSOX group and 74.0% for the SOX group (P = 0.355), with a hazard ratio for peritoneal relapse of 0.287 (95% CI, 0.090-0.915; P = 0.035). Subgroup analysis indicated that stage IIIC GC patients in the PSOX group had a higher DFS rate than those in the SOX group(P = 0.032). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events, as per the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, such as leucopenia (10.6% vs. 4.5%), neutropenia (10.6% vs. 9.1%), nausea/vomiting (4.5% vs. 3.0%), and diarrhea (4.5% vs. 3.0%) were relatively common in the PSOX group compared to the SOX group, with no statistically significant differences between the two groups.ConclusionOur findings suggested that adjuvant PSOX chemotherapy offers superior survival benefits compared to the SOX regimen in patients with staged IIIC GC after D2 gastrectomy. The incidence of adverse events with PSOX chemotherapy was comparable to that of SOX chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2023, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer. Version 5.2023
[2]   Adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): a phase 3 open-label, randomised controlled trial [J].
Bang, Yung-Jue ;
Kim, Young-Woo ;
Yang, Han-Kwang ;
Chung, Hyun Cheol ;
Park, Young-Kyu ;
Lee, Kyung Hee ;
Lee, Keun-Wook ;
Kim, Yong Ho ;
Noh, Sang-Ik ;
Cho, Jae Yong ;
Mok, Young Jae ;
Kim, Yeul Hong ;
Ji, Jiafu ;
Yeh, Ta-Sen ;
Button, Peter ;
Sirzen, Florin ;
Noh, Sung Hoon .
LANCET, 2012, 379 (9813) :315-321
[3]   Changing profiles of cancer burden worldwide and in China: a secondary analysis of the global cancer statistics 2020 [J].
Cao, Wei ;
Chen, Hong-Da ;
Yu, Yi-Wen ;
Li, Ni ;
Chen, Wan-Qing .
CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 134 (07) :783-791
[4]   The role of oxaliplatin in the adjuvant setting of different Lauren's type of gastric adenocarcinoma after D2 gastrectomy: a real-world study [J].
Cheng, Xi ;
Yu, Shan ;
Wang, Yan ;
Cui, Yuehong ;
Li, Wei ;
Tang, Cheng ;
Jiang, Huiqin ;
Ji, Yuan ;
Sun, Yihong ;
Wang, Xuefei ;
Shen, Zhenbin ;
Liu, Fenglin ;
Liu, Tian-shu .
GASTRIC CANCER, 2019, 22 (03) :587-597
[5]   Efficacy and safety of nano-paclitaxel formulation for cancer treatment: evidence from randomized clinical trials [J].
Deng, Xiangmin ;
Huang, Xiaoqin ;
Dong, Xiaoyan ;
Mao, Genxiang ;
Xing, Wenmin .
NANOMEDICINE, 2023, 18 (10) :833-843
[6]   Impact on survival of timing and duration of adjuvant chemotherapy in radically resected gastric cancer [J].
Di Bartolomeo, Maria ;
Pietrantonio, Filippo ;
Rulli, Eliana ;
Poli, Davide ;
Berenato, Rosa ;
Caporale, Marta ;
Bajetta, Emilio ;
Floriani, Irene .
TUMORI JOURNAL, 2016, 102 (04) :E15-E19
[7]   Analysis of the efficacy and influencing factors of preoperative P-SOX neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for progressive gastric cancer-construction of a clinical prediction model [J].
Feng, Long ;
Shao, Lei ;
Sun, Shuangshuang ;
Zhang, Chengwu ;
Cai, Baojia .
CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (12) :13031-13040
[8]   Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition) [J].
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association .
GASTRIC CANCER, 2021, 24 (01) :1-21
[9]   POF (paclitaxel plus FOLFOX) versus IP PAC (intraperitoneal paclitaxel plus FOLFOX) versus FOLFOX as a first-line treatment in advanced gastric cancer (AGC): Update from a multicenter, randomized phase II trial, FNF-004 trial. [J].
Lin, Rongbo ;
Chen, Yigui ;
Zhu, Jinfeng ;
Lin, Peicheng ;
Chen, Wujin ;
Fang, Wenzheng ;
Li, Hui ;
Liu, Jie ;
Zhao, Shen ;
Fan, Nan-Feng .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (15)
[10]   Gastric Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Classification, Genomic Characteristics and Treatment Strategies [J].
Machlowska, Julita ;
Baj, Jacek ;
Sitarz, Monika ;
Maciejewski, Ryszard ;
Sitarz, Robert .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2020, 21 (11)