Urban ecosystem services research in Russia: Systematic review on the state of the art

被引:2
作者
Dushkova, Diana [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Konstantinova, Anastasia [3 ]
Matasov, Victor [3 ,4 ]
Gaeva, Dara [5 ]
Dovletyarova, Elvira [3 ]
Taherkhani, Mina [3 ]
机构
[1] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Conservat Biol & Social Ecol Syst, Permoser Str 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[2] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Urban & Environm Sociol, Permoser Str 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[3] Peoples Friendship Univ Russia RUDN Univ, Agrarian & Technol Inst, Miklukho Maklaya Str 6, Moscow 117198, Russia
[4] HSE Univ, Fac Geog & Geoinformat Technol, Higher Sch Econ, 11 Pokrovsky Blvd, Moscow 109028, Russia
[5] Immanuel Kant Balt Fed Univ, A Nevskogo 14, Kaliningrad 236016, Russia
关键词
Ecosystem services; Environment; Russia; Sustainable development; Urban blue-green infrastructure; Urban ecosystems; GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE; NATIONAL ASSESSMENT; LANDSCAPE CONCEPTS; CLASSIFICATION; FRAMEWORK; SOILS; TIME;
D O I
10.1007/s13280-024-02102-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Research on urban ecosystem services (ES) covers many regions globally, yet significant gaps remain in several areas, including Russia. Furthermore, the number of publications on Russian ES is still very low, and most of them focus on ES assessment on the national level which results in an incomplete understanding of ES provision in Russian cities. To fill this gap, 197 publications on urban ES have been systematically reviewed. Those mostly included research on urban ES in Russia as well as in other cities of the world that represented case studies within international collaborations of Russian scientists with other partners. The paper presents the main aspects of the ES concept adoption and operationalizing in the Russian scientific discourse, by providing an overview of the current research on the relationships between humans and urban ecosystems. Spatially, the majority of studies focused on large cities; herewith field surveys, statistical analysis, expert evaluations, and mapping were often used as the main research methods. Four key challenge areas have been revealed: anthropogenic pressure on soils and vegetation, urban green spaces (UGS) and their quantity and quality for ES provision, the value of ES assessment for urban planning, and payments for ES. To address these challenges, future research should focus on the role of urban ES for city resilience and sustainability, ecosystem disservices, rural-urban interactions, broader testing and validation of ES mapping and assessment as well as better integration of ES in economic, regulatory and compensation mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 602
页数:26
相关论文
共 120 条
[1]  
Abakumov Evgeny, 2022, Journal of Water and Land Development, P1, DOI 10.24425/jwld.2021.139937
[2]   Global trend of forest ecosystem services valuation - An analysis of publications [J].
Acharya, Ram Prasad ;
Maraseni, Tek ;
Cockfield, Geoff .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2019, 39
[3]   Integrating the third dimension into the concept of urban ecosystem services: A review [J].
Alavipanah, Sadroddin ;
Haase, Dagmar ;
Lakes, Tobia ;
Qureshi, Salman .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2017, 72 :374-398
[4]  
Aleksandriiskaia K., 2021, ADV TECHN SUST DEV U, P230, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-75285-922, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-75285-922]
[5]   Tapping into non-English-language science for the conservation of global biodiversity [J].
Amano, Tatsuya ;
Berdejo-Espinola, Violeta ;
Christie, Alec P. ;
Willott, Kate ;
Akasaka, Munemitsu ;
Baldi, Andras ;
Berthinussen, Anna ;
Bertolino, Sandro ;
Bladon, Andrew J. ;
Chen, Min ;
Choi, Chang-Yong ;
Kharrat, Magda Bou Dagher ;
de Oliveira, Luis G. ;
Farhat, Perla ;
Golivets, Marina ;
Aranzamendi, Nataly Hidalgo ;
Jantke, Kerstin ;
Kajzer-Bonk, Joanna ;
Aytekin, M. Cisel Kemahli ;
Khorozyan, Igor ;
Kito, Kensuke ;
Konno, Ko ;
Lin, Da-Li ;
Littlewood, Nick ;
Liu, Yang ;
Liu, Yifan ;
Loretto, Matthias-Claudio ;
Marconi, Valentina ;
Martin, Philip A. ;
Morgan, William H. ;
Narvaez-Gomez, Juan P. ;
Negret, Pablo Jose ;
Nourani, Elham ;
Ochoa Quintero, Jose M. ;
Ockendon, Nancy ;
Oh, Rachel Rui Ying ;
Petrovan, Silviu O. ;
Piovezan-Borges, Ana C. ;
Pollet, Ingrid L. ;
Ramos, Danielle L. ;
Segovia, Ana L. Reboredo ;
Nayelli Rivera-Villanueva, A. ;
Rocha, Ricardo ;
Rouyer, Marie-Morgane ;
Sainsbury, Katherine A. ;
Schuster, Richard ;
Schwab, Dominik ;
Sekercioglu, Cagan H. ;
Seo, Hae-Min ;
Shackelford, Gorm .
PLOS BIOLOGY, 2021, 19 (10)
[6]   Measurement, Collaborative Learning and Research for Sustainable Use of Ecosystem Services: Landscape Concepts and Europe as Laboratory [J].
Angelstam, Per ;
Grodzynskyi, Michael ;
Andersson, Kjell ;
Axelsson, Robert ;
Elbakidze, Marine ;
Khoroshev, Alexander ;
Kruhlov, Ivan ;
Naumov, Vladimir .
AMBIO, 2013, 42 (02) :129-145
[7]   New scholarly pathways on green gentrification: What does the urban 'green turn' mean and where is it going? [J].
Anguelovski, Isabelle ;
Connolly, James J. T. ;
Garcia-Lamarca, Melissa ;
Cole, Helen ;
Pearsall, Hamil .
PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 43 (06) :1064-1086
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2013, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity program, the Group of Eight, UNEP, the United Nations Environment Program
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and human wellbeing: synthesis
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2021, STAT PROT ENV RUSS F, P864