Modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors affecting surgical failure after revision ACL reconstruction: a cohort study

被引:1
作者
Moon, Hyun-Soo [1 ,2 ]
Jung, Min [1 ,2 ]
Choi, Chong-Hyuk [1 ,2 ]
Chung, Kwangho [1 ,3 ]
Jung, Se-Han [1 ,2 ]
Byun, Junwoo [1 ,4 ]
Kim, Jin-Gyu [1 ,4 ]
Lee, Seungmin [2 ]
Kim, Sung-Hwan [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Arthroscopy & Joint Res Inst, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Severance Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Yongin Severance Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Yongin, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Gangnam Severance Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Surgical failure; Multiple revision surgery; Osteoarthritis; Femoral tunnel; CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION; FOLLOW-UP; RELIABILITY; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; RESPONSIVENESS; MENISCUS; INJURIES; MINIMUM;
D O I
10.1186/s43019-024-00243-4
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundResearch on factors influencing the outcomes of revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is relatively scarce and mostly relies even on reports from a single group. Understanding the factors contributing to the failure of revision ACL reconstruction can provide valuable information for achieving better clinical outcomes and assist in patient counseling before surgery. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the factors contributing to surgical failure after revision ACL reconstruction.MethodsThe medical records of consecutive patients who underwent single-bundle revision ACL reconstruction using the transportal technique between 2010 and 2020 and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years were retrospectively reviewed. Eligible patients were classified into two groups on the basis of the presence of surgical failure during the follow-up period (group NF, patients who did not experience surgical failure; group F, patients who experienced surgical failure). In this study, surgical failure after revision ACL reconstruction was defined as meeting any of the following conditions during follow-up: the presence of graft re-tear confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), anterior-posterior laxity graded >= 2, or rotational laxity graded >= 2. A comparative analysis was conducted on demographic data, as well as peri-, intra-, and postoperative data between the groups. Additionally, a regression analysis was performed to investigate factors influencing surgical failure after revision ACL reconstruction.ResultsA total of 58 patients were included (group NF, 40 patients; group F, 18 patients). In between-group comparisons of demographic, peri-, and intra-operative data, group F exhibited a higher frequency of multiple revision surgeries (P = 0.001), increased preoperative osteoarthritis grade (P = 0.001), and shallower femoral tunnel depth (P = 0.002) compared with group NF. At the final follow-up, group F demonstrated relatively poor clinical outcomes, both subjectively and objectively. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that all variables that showed differences in the preceding comparisons were independent factors affecting surgical failure after revision ACL reconstruction.ConclusionsSurgical failure after revision ACL reconstruction can occur in a substantial number of patients, influenced by non-modifiable factors, such as cases corresponding to multiple revision surgery and preoperative osteoarthritis grade, and modifiable factors, such as femoral tunnel depth.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [11] Truncated-pyramid shape simulation for the measurement of femoral intercondylar notch volume can detect the volume difference between ACL-injured and intact subjects
    Iriuchishima, Takanori
    Goto, Bunsei
    Fu, Freddie H.
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2021, 29 (06) : 1709 - 1713
  • [12] Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form
    Irrgang, James J.
    Anderson, Allen F.
    Boland, Arthur L.
    Harner, Christopher D.
    Neyret, Philippe
    Richmond, John C.
    Shelbourne, K. Donald
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2006, 34 (10) : 1567 - 1573
  • [13] Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Kamath, Ganesh V.
    Redfern, John C.
    Greis, Patrick E.
    Burks, Robert T.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (01) : 199 - 217
  • [14] Koga H., 2017, J ISAKOS, V2, P36, DOI [10.1136/jisakos-2016-000071, DOI 10.1136/JISAKOS-2016-000071]
  • [15] Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Kraeutler, Matthew J.
    Welton, K. Linnea
    McCarty, Eric C.
    Bravman, Jonathan T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2017, 99 (19) : 1689 - 1696
  • [16] The Epidemiology of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Ontario, Canada
    Leroux, Timothy
    Wasserstein, David
    Dwyer, Tim
    Ogilvie-Harris, Darrell J.
    Marks, Paul H.
    Bach, Bernard R., Jr.
    Townley, John B.
    Mahomed, Nizar
    Chahal, Jaskarndip
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (11) : 2666 - 2672
  • [17] Failure modes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Xiaoke
    Yan, Lei
    Li, Dijun
    Fan, Zijuan
    Liu, Haifeng
    Wang, Guishan
    Jiu, Jingwei
    Yang, Ziquan
    Li, Jiao Jiao
    Wang, Bin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2023, 47 (03) : 719 - 734
  • [18] Outcomes and Risk Factors of Rerevision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Liechti, Daniel J.
    Chahla, Jorge
    Dean, Chase S.
    Mitchell, Justin J.
    Slette, Erik
    Menge, Travis J.
    LaPrade, Robert F.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2016, 32 (10) : 2151 - 2159
  • [19] Incidence and Outcome After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Results From the Danish Registry for Knee Ligament Reconstructions
    Lind, Martin
    Menhert, Frank
    Pedersen, Alma B.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2012, 40 (07) : 1551 - 1557
  • [20] Controversies in ACL revision surgery: Italian expert group consensus and state of the art
    Matassi, Fabrizio
    Giabbani, Niccolo
    Arnaldi, Enrico
    Tripodo, Alessandro
    Bonaspetti, Giovanni
    Bait, Corrado
    Ronga, Mario
    Di Benedetto, Paolo
    Zaffagnini, Stefano
    Jannelli, Eugenio
    Panni, Alfredo Schiavone
    Berruto, Massimo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2022, 23 (01)