Modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors affecting surgical failure after revision ACL reconstruction: a cohort study

被引:1
作者
Moon, Hyun-Soo [1 ,2 ]
Jung, Min [1 ,2 ]
Choi, Chong-Hyuk [1 ,2 ]
Chung, Kwangho [1 ,3 ]
Jung, Se-Han [1 ,2 ]
Byun, Junwoo [1 ,4 ]
Kim, Jin-Gyu [1 ,4 ]
Lee, Seungmin [2 ]
Kim, Sung-Hwan [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Arthroscopy & Joint Res Inst, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Severance Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Yongin Severance Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Yongin, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Gangnam Severance Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Surgical failure; Multiple revision surgery; Osteoarthritis; Femoral tunnel; CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION; FOLLOW-UP; RELIABILITY; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; RESPONSIVENESS; MENISCUS; INJURIES; MINIMUM;
D O I
10.1186/s43019-024-00243-4
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundResearch on factors influencing the outcomes of revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is relatively scarce and mostly relies even on reports from a single group. Understanding the factors contributing to the failure of revision ACL reconstruction can provide valuable information for achieving better clinical outcomes and assist in patient counseling before surgery. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the factors contributing to surgical failure after revision ACL reconstruction.MethodsThe medical records of consecutive patients who underwent single-bundle revision ACL reconstruction using the transportal technique between 2010 and 2020 and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years were retrospectively reviewed. Eligible patients were classified into two groups on the basis of the presence of surgical failure during the follow-up period (group NF, patients who did not experience surgical failure; group F, patients who experienced surgical failure). In this study, surgical failure after revision ACL reconstruction was defined as meeting any of the following conditions during follow-up: the presence of graft re-tear confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), anterior-posterior laxity graded >= 2, or rotational laxity graded >= 2. A comparative analysis was conducted on demographic data, as well as peri-, intra-, and postoperative data between the groups. Additionally, a regression analysis was performed to investigate factors influencing surgical failure after revision ACL reconstruction.ResultsA total of 58 patients were included (group NF, 40 patients; group F, 18 patients). In between-group comparisons of demographic, peri-, and intra-operative data, group F exhibited a higher frequency of multiple revision surgeries (P = 0.001), increased preoperative osteoarthritis grade (P = 0.001), and shallower femoral tunnel depth (P = 0.002) compared with group NF. At the final follow-up, group F demonstrated relatively poor clinical outcomes, both subjectively and objectively. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that all variables that showed differences in the preceding comparisons were independent factors affecting surgical failure after revision ACL reconstruction.ConclusionsSurgical failure after revision ACL reconstruction can occur in a substantial number of patients, influenced by non-modifiable factors, such as cases corresponding to multiple revision surgery and preoperative osteoarthritis grade, and modifiable factors, such as femoral tunnel depth.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Ramp lesion in anterior cruciate ligament injury: a review of the anatomy, biomechanics, epidemiology, and diagnosis
    Bae, Bo Seung
    Yoo, Sunin
    Lee, Sang Hak
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY & RELATED RESEARCH, 2023, 35 (01)
  • [2] Italian consensus statement for the use of allografts in ACL reconstructive surgery
    Bait, Corrado
    Randelli, Pietro
    Compagnoni, Riccardo
    Ferrua, Paolo
    Papalia, Rocco
    Familiari, Filippo
    Tecame, Andrea
    Adravanti, Paolo
    Adriani, Ezio
    Arnaldi, Enrico
    Benazzo, Franco
    Berruto, Massimo
    Bonaspetti, Giovanni
    Canata, Gian Luigi
    Cane, Pier Paolo
    Causero, Araldo
    Coari, Giancarlo
    Denti, Matteo
    Fare, Maristella
    Ferretti, Andrea
    Fravisini, Marco
    Giron, Francesco
    Gobbi, Alberto
    Madonna, Vincenzo
    Manunta, Andrea
    Mariani, Pier Paolo
    Mazzola, Claudio
    Milano, Giuseppe
    Pederzini, Luigi
    Quaglia, Flavio
    Ronga, Mario
    Schonhuber, Herbert
    Stefani, Giacomo
    Volpi, Piero
    Zanon, Giacomo
    Zini, Raul
    Zorzi, Claudio
    Zaffagnini, Stefano
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2019, 27 (06) : 1873 - 1881
  • [3] The Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the Lysholm Score and Tegner Activity Scale for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries of the Knee
    Briggs, Karen K.
    Lysholm, Jack
    Tegner, Yelverton
    Rodkey, William G.
    Kocher, Mininder S.
    Steadman, J. Richard
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (05) : 890 - 897
  • [4] Non-anatomic tunnel position increases the risk of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Byrne, Kevin J.
    Hughes, Jonathan D.
    Gibbs, Christopher
    Vaswani, Ravi
    Meredith, Sean J.
    Popchak, Adam
    Lesniak, Bryson P.
    Karlsson, Jon
    Irrgang, James J.
    Musahl, Volker
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2022, 30 (04) : 1388 - 1395
  • [5] Differences in Mechanisms of Failure, Intraoperative Findings, and Surgical Characteristics Between Single- and Multiple-Revision ACL Reconstructions A MARS Cohort Study
    Chen, James L.
    Allen, Christina R.
    Stephens, Thomas E.
    Haas, Amanda K.
    Huston, Laura J.
    Wright, Rick W.
    Feeley, Brian T.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (07) : 1571 - 1578
  • [6] Grassi A, 2017, BONE JOINT J, V99B, P714, DOI [10.1302/0301-620X.99B6.BJJ-2016-0929, 10.1302/0301-620X.99B6.BJJ-2016-0929.R2]
  • [7] What Is the Mid-term Failure Rate of Revision ACL Reconstruction? A Systematic Review
    Grassi, Alberto
    Kim, Christopher
    Muccioli, Giulio Maria Marcheggiani
    Zaffagnini, Stefano
    Amendola, Annunziato
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2017, 475 (10) : 2484 - 2499
  • [8] Does revision ACL reconstruction measure up to primary surgery? A meta-analysis comparing patient-reported and clinician-reported outcomes, and radiographic results
    Grassi, Alberto
    Ardern, Clare L.
    Muccioli, Giulio Maria Marcheggiani
    Neri, Maria Pia
    Marcacci, Maurilio
    Zaffagnini, Stefano
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2016, 50 (12) : 716 - 724
  • [9] Harris JD, 2017, ARTHROSCOPY, V33, P1102, DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.01.053
  • [10] The Rate of Subsequent Surgery and Predictors After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Two- and 6-Year Follow-up Results From a Multicenter Cohort
    Hettrich, Carolyn M.
    Dunn, Warren R.
    Reinke, Emily K.
    Spindler, Kurt P.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (07) : 1534 - 1540