Behavioral economics and the nature of neoclassical paradigm

被引:0
作者
Esposito L. [1 ,2 ]
Mastromatteo G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Bank of Italy, and Economic Policy Department, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan
[2] Economic Policy Department, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan
关键词
Behavioral economics; Bounded rationality; Expected utility theory; Rational expectations; Simon;
D O I
10.1007/s11299-024-00303-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Psychological observations are by now well integrated into economics, especially in the theory of finance, as can also be seen in the Nobel Prize awarded to Thaler. On the contrary, Simon’s attempt to reforge economic theory on the paradigm of bounded rationality failed. Starting from the birth of the neoclassical paradigm, we’ll describe the attempt to give it psychological foundations with a direct measurement of utility, then the axiomatic turn of the paradigm and its first anomalies. We’ll then sum up the debate on rationality, taking place in the group of economists led by Simon, which brought to the rational expectations hypothesis. Finally, we’ll discuss the development of behavioral economics and its progressive acceptance in economic theory. This historical reconstruction allows us to understand the actual hard core of the neoclassical paradigm and the growing need of the paradigm for practical flexibility that determines how to choose arguments, methods and evidence that can be useful to its development, including psychological ones. © The Author(s) 2024.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 78
页数:33
相关论文
共 147 条
[1]  
Angner E., We’re all behavioral economists now, J Econ Method, 26, 3, pp. 195-207, (2019)
[2]  
Arrow K.J., Rationality of self and others in an Economic System, J Bus, 59, 4, pp. S385-S399, (1986)
[3]  
Augier M., Sublime Simon, J Econ Psychol, 22, 3, pp. 307-334, (2001)
[4]  
Augier M., March J.G., Remembering Herbert A. Simon 1916–2001, Public Admin Rev, 61, 4, pp. 396-402, (2001)
[5]  
Barnes B., T. S. Kuhn and Social Science, (1982)
[6]  
Becker G.S., Irrational Behavior and Economic Theory, J Political Econ, 70, 1, pp. 1-13, (1962)
[7]  
Becker G.S., The Economic Approach to Human Behavior, (1976)
[8]  
Berg N., Normative behavioral economics, J Soc-Ec, 32, pp. 411-427, (2003)
[9]  
Berg N., The consistency and ecological rationality schools of normative economics: singular versus Plural Metrics for assessing bounded rationality, J Ec Meth, 21, 4, pp. 375-395, (2014)
[10]  
Berg N., Gigerenzer G., Psychology implies paternalism? Bounded rationality may reduce the Rationale to regulate risk-taking, Soc Choice Welf, 28, 2, pp. 337-359, (2007)