Comparative analysis of sensors and classification algorithms for land cover classification in Islamabad, Pakistan

被引:2
作者
Hussain, Khadim [1 ,8 ,9 ]
Badshah, Tariq [1 ,8 ,9 ]
Mehmood, Kaleem [2 ,3 ,8 ,9 ]
Rahman, Arif ur [4 ,8 ,9 ]
Shahzad, Fahad [5 ,8 ,9 ]
Anees, Shoaib Ahmad [6 ,8 ,9 ]
Khan, Waseem Razzaq [7 ,8 ,9 ]
Yujun, Sun [1 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Forestry Univ, State Forestry & Grassland Adm Key Lab Forest Reso, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Forestry Univ, Key Lab Silviculture & Conservat, Minist Educ, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Swat, Inst Forest Sci, Swat, Pakistan
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Aerosp Informat Res Inst, Beijing 100094, Peoples R China
[5] Beijing Forestry Univ, Mapping & 3S Technol Ctr, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Agr, Dept Forestry, Dera Ismail Khan 29050, Pakistan
[7] Univ Putra Malaysia, Fac Forestry & Environm, Dept Forestry Sci & Biodivers, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
[8] Univ Trieste, Natl Inst Oceanog, Adv Master Sustainable Blue Econ, Appl Geophys OGS, I-34127 Trieste, Italy
[9] Univ Putra Malaysia, Inst Ekosains Borneo IEB, Bintulu Campus, Sarawak 97008, Malaysia
关键词
LULC classification; Machine learning algorithms; Remote sensing; Urban Planning; RANDOM FOREST; IMAGERY; GIS; SENTINEL-2; LANDSCAPE; INSIGHTS;
D O I
10.1007/s12145-025-01720-4
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Land use and land cover (LULC) classification is essential for environmental monitoring and sustainable land management. The selection of satellite sensors and classification algorithms influences the accuracy of LULC classification. This study evaluates the performance of three satellite sensors, GF-6 (GF-6), S2 (S2), and L9(L9), and three machine learning classifiers, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), in classifying LULC in Islamabad, Pakistan. The satellite data with high-to-course spatial resolution data was utilized, and a comprehensive pre-processing workflow ensured high-quality imagery. The results indicate that XGBoost, paired with GF-6, achieved the highest overall classification accuracy (94.24%) and kappa coefficient (0.9279), outperforming RF and SVM. S2 combined with XGBoost also showed superior performance (92.89%) compared to other sensor-algorithm combinations. The study reveals that high spatial resolution (GF-6) significantly improves LULC classification, particularly in detecting forest and urban areas. Feature importance analysis identified GF-6 Red and NIR bands as the most significant predictors, especially for vegetation-related classes. The findings underscore the importance of selecting the appropriate sensor and classifier for specific LULC tasks, with XGBoost and high-resolution sensors like GF-6 providing the most accurate results. This study contributes to the growing body of research on LULC classification and offers valuable insights for urban planning and environmental monitoring.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   COMPARING SUPERVISED ALGORITHMS IN LAND USE AND LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION OF A LANDSAT TIME-SERIES [J].
Nery, Thayse ;
Sadler, Rohan ;
Solis-Aulestia, Maria ;
White, Ben ;
Polyakov, Maksym ;
Chalak, Morteza .
2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2016, :5165-5168
[22]   Land use and land cover classification using machine learning algorithms in google earth engine [J].
Arpitha, M. ;
Ahmed, S. A. ;
Harishnaika, N. .
EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATICS, 2023, 16 (04) :3057-3073
[23]   Land use and land cover classification using machine learning algorithms in google earth engine [J].
Arpitha M ;
S A Ahmed ;
Harishnaika N .
Earth Science Informatics, 2023, 16 :3057-3073
[24]   A comparison of classification techniques to support land cover and land use analysis in tropical coastal zones [J].
Szuster, Brian W. ;
Chen, Qi ;
Borger, Michael .
APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2011, 31 (02) :525-532
[25]   Digital image classification of land cover [J].
Montero, J ;
Yáñez, J ;
Amo, A ;
Gómez, D ;
Biging, G .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH JOINT CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2002, :125-127
[26]   Selection of classification techniques for land use/land cover change investigation [J].
Srivastava, Prashant K. ;
Han, Dawei ;
Rico-Ramirez, Miguel A. ;
Bray, Michaela ;
Islam, Tanvir .
ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2012, 50 (09) :1250-1265
[27]   Land Use and Land Cover Classification Meets Deep Learning: A Review [J].
Zhao, Shengyu ;
Tu, Kaiwen ;
Ye, Shutong ;
Tang, Hao ;
Hu, Yaocong ;
Xie, Chao .
SENSORS, 2023, 23 (21)
[28]   HOW LANDSAT 9 IS SUPERIOR TO LANDSAT 8: COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF LAND USE LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION AND LAND SURFACE TEMPERATURE [J].
Ghasempour, F. ;
Sekertekin, A. ;
Kutoglu, S. H. .
ISPRS GEOSPATIAL CONFERENCE 2022, JOINT 6TH SENSORS AND MODELS IN PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, SMPR/4TH GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION RESEARCH, GIRESEARCH CONFERENCES, VOL. 10-4, 2023, :221-227
[29]   Importance of Spectral Information, Seasonality, and Topography on Land Cover Classification of Tropical Land Cover Mapping [J].
Sovann, Chansopheaktra ;
Olin, Stefan ;
Mansourian, Ali ;
Sakhoeun, Sakada ;
Prey, Sovann ;
Kok, Sothea ;
Tagesson, Torbern .
REMOTE SENSING, 2025, 17 (09)
[30]   A Comparison of Three Temporal Smoothing Algorithms to Improve Land Cover Classification: A Case Study from NEPAL [J].
Khanal, Nishanta ;
Matin, Mir Abdul ;
Uddin, Kabir ;
Poortinga, Ate ;
Chishtie, Farrukh ;
Tenneson, Karis ;
Saah, David .
REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (18)