Comparative analysis of sensors and classification algorithms for land cover classification in Islamabad, Pakistan

被引:0
|
作者
Hussain, Khadim [1 ,8 ,9 ]
Badshah, Tariq [1 ,8 ,9 ]
Mehmood, Kaleem [2 ,3 ,8 ,9 ]
Rahman, Arif ur [4 ,8 ,9 ]
Shahzad, Fahad [5 ,8 ,9 ]
Anees, Shoaib Ahmad [6 ,8 ,9 ]
Khan, Waseem Razzaq [7 ,8 ,9 ]
Yujun, Sun [1 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Forestry Univ, State Forestry & Grassland Adm Key Lab Forest Reso, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Forestry Univ, Key Lab Silviculture & Conservat, Minist Educ, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Swat, Inst Forest Sci, Swat, Pakistan
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Aerosp Informat Res Inst, Beijing 100094, Peoples R China
[5] Beijing Forestry Univ, Mapping & 3S Technol Ctr, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Agr, Dept Forestry, Dera Ismail Khan 29050, Pakistan
[7] Univ Putra Malaysia, Fac Forestry & Environm, Dept Forestry Sci & Biodivers, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
[8] Univ Trieste, Natl Inst Oceanog, Adv Master Sustainable Blue Econ, Appl Geophys OGS, I-34127 Trieste, Italy
[9] Univ Putra Malaysia, Inst Ekosains Borneo IEB, Bintulu Campus, Sarawak 97008, Malaysia
关键词
LULC classification; Machine learning algorithms; Remote sensing; Urban Planning; RANDOM FOREST; IMAGERY; GIS; SENTINEL-2; LANDSCAPE; INSIGHTS;
D O I
10.1007/s12145-025-01720-4
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Land use and land cover (LULC) classification is essential for environmental monitoring and sustainable land management. The selection of satellite sensors and classification algorithms influences the accuracy of LULC classification. This study evaluates the performance of three satellite sensors, GF-6 (GF-6), S2 (S2), and L9(L9), and three machine learning classifiers, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), in classifying LULC in Islamabad, Pakistan. The satellite data with high-to-course spatial resolution data was utilized, and a comprehensive pre-processing workflow ensured high-quality imagery. The results indicate that XGBoost, paired with GF-6, achieved the highest overall classification accuracy (94.24%) and kappa coefficient (0.9279), outperforming RF and SVM. S2 combined with XGBoost also showed superior performance (92.89%) compared to other sensor-algorithm combinations. The study reveals that high spatial resolution (GF-6) significantly improves LULC classification, particularly in detecting forest and urban areas. Feature importance analysis identified GF-6 Red and NIR bands as the most significant predictors, especially for vegetation-related classes. The findings underscore the importance of selecting the appropriate sensor and classifier for specific LULC tasks, with XGBoost and high-resolution sensors like GF-6 providing the most accurate results. This study contributes to the growing body of research on LULC classification and offers valuable insights for urban planning and environmental monitoring.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative Analysis of Classification Algorithms on Tactile Sensors
    Becari, Wesley
    Ruiz, Luana
    Evaristo, Bruno G. P.
    Ramirez-Fernandez, Francisco Javier
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS - 20TH IEEE ISCE, 2016, : 1 - 2
  • [2] Deep Learning Based Land Cover and Crop Type Classification: A Comparative Study
    Khan, Asim Hameed
    Fraz, Muhammad Moazam
    Shahzad, Muhammad
    2021 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL FUTURES AND TRANSFORMATIVE TECHNOLOGIES (ICODT2), 2021,
  • [3] Decision Tree Algorithms for Developing Rulesets for Object-Based Land Cover Classification
    Phiri, Darius
    Simwanda, Matamyo
    Nyirenda, Vincent
    Murayama, Yuji
    Ranagalage, Manjula
    ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2020, 9 (05)
  • [4] Classification of land use and land cover through machine learning algorithms: a literature review
    Tobar-Diaz, Rene
    Gao, Yan
    Mas, Jean Francois
    Cambron-Sandoval, Victor Hugo
    REVISTA DE TELEDETECCION, 2023, (62): : 1 - 19
  • [5] Evaluating the impact of classification algorithms and spatial resolution on the accuracy of land cover mapping in a mountain environment in Pakistan
    Ullah, Sami
    Shafique, Muhammad
    Farooq, Muhammad
    Zeeshan, Muhammad
    Dees, Matthias
    ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2017, 10 (03)
  • [6] Comparison of Three Machine Learning Algorithms Using Google Earth Engine for Land Use Land Cover Classification
    Zhao, Zhewen
    Islam, Fakhrul
    Waseem, Liaqat Ali
    Tariq, Aqil
    Nawaz, Muhammad
    Ul Islam, Ijaz
    Bibi, Tehmina
    Rehman, Nazir Ur
    Ahmad, Waqar
    Aslam, Rana Waqar
    Raza, Danish
    Hatamleh, Wesam Atef
    RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2024, 92 : 129 - 137
  • [7] Evaluating the impact of classification algorithms and spatial resolution on the accuracy of land cover mapping in a mountain environment in Pakistan
    Sami Ullah
    Muhammad Shafique
    Muhammad Farooq
    Muhammad Zeeshan
    Matthias Dees
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2017, 10
  • [8] A Comparative Study of High-level Classification Algorithms for Land Use and Land Cover Classification and Periodic Change Analysis Over Transboundary Ruvu River Basin, Tanzania
    Deus Michael
    Ray Singh Meena
    Brijesh Kumar
    Remote Sensing in Earth Systems Sciences, 2024, 7 (3) : 218 - 235
  • [9] Comparison of Simulated Multispectral Reflectance among Four Sensors in Land Cover Classification
    Chen, Feng
    Zhang, Wenhao
    Song, Yuejun
    Liu, Lin
    Wang, Chenxing
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (09)
  • [10] Assessment of Machine Learning Algorithms for Land Cover Classification in a Complex Mountainous Landscape
    Amin, Gomal
    Imtiaz, Iqra
    Haroon, Ehsan
    Saqib, Najum Us
    Shahzad, Muhammad Imran
    Nazeer, Majid
    JOURNAL OF GEOVISUALIZATION AND SPATIAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 8 (02)