Adaptive FEM-SPIM Coupling for Phase-Field Modeling of Fracture

被引:0
作者
Novelli, Larissa [1 ]
Pitangueira, Roque Luiz da Silva [2 ]
Gori, Lapo [2 ]
机构
[1] Fed Inst Espirito Santo IFES, Dept Civil Engn, Vitoria, ES, Brazil
[2] Fed Univ Minas Gerais UFMG, Dept Struct Engn, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
关键词
adaptive refinement; coupled models; phase-field modeling; smoothed point interpolation methods; POINT INTERPOLATION METHOD; G-SPACE THEORY; BRITTLE-FRACTURE; IMPLEMENTATION; PROPAGATION; FORMULATION; FORM;
D O I
10.1002/nme.7609
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This article proposes an adaptive coupling strategy between the standard FEM and smoothed point interpolation methods (SPIMs) for the solution of phase-field fracture problems, where the SPIM discretization is used to model the fracture propagation regions. Adaptive strategies are an important tool for problems that demand highly refined meshes in localized regions, such as in phase-field problems. In the proposed strategy, the problem is initially discretized with a coarse FEM mesh, that is automatically replaced and refined by an SPIM discretization when and where fracture occurs. Five different benchmark tests are presented to illustrate the robustness of the proposed strategy. Brittle and quasi-brittle problems are simulated and evaluated in terms of phase-field contour plots and load-displacement paths, showing good agreement with literature results and with results obtained with previously refined FEM models. The numerical simulations consider different criteria for the identification of the regions where the discretization replacement and refinement must occur, different sizes of the substitution regions, and different SPIM strategies. The proposed strategy relies on three properties of the meshfree strategy: (i) the reduced connectivity that ease the adaptive refinement, (ii) the presence of the Kronecker-delta property, that makes the coupling with the FEM mesh straightforward, and (iii) the presence of nonpolynomial approximation functions, that provide a better approximation of the phase-field profile. As illustrated by the simulations, this new strategy results in computational times that are comparable with the ones of a previously refined FEM mesh, without requiring an a priori knowledge of the replacement regions.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Ahrens J., 2005, Visualization Handbook, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-012387582-2/50038-1
[2]   A review on phase-field models of brittle fracture and a new fast hybrid formulation [J].
Ambati, Marreddy ;
Gerasimov, Tymofiy ;
De Lorenzis, Laura .
COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS, 2015, 55 (02) :383-405
[3]   ANISOTROPIC MESH ADAPTATION FOR CRACK DETECTION IN BRITTLE MATERIALS [J].
Artina, Marco ;
Fornasier, Massimo ;
Micheletti, Stefano ;
Perotto, Simona .
SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, 2015, 37 (04) :B633-B659
[4]   An h-adaptive thermo-mechanical phase field model for fracture [J].
Badnava, Hojjat ;
Msekh, Mohammed A. ;
Etemadi, Elahe ;
Rabczuk, Timon .
FINITE ELEMENTS IN ANALYSIS AND DESIGN, 2018, 138 :31-47
[5]   Flexible complementarity solvers for large-scale applications [J].
Benson, SJ ;
Munson, TS .
OPTIMIZATION METHODS & SOFTWARE, 2006, 21 (01) :155-168
[6]   Numerical experiments in revisited brittle fracture [J].
Bourdin, B ;
Francfort, GA ;
Marigo, JJ .
JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICS AND PHYSICS OF SOLIDS, 2000, 48 (04) :797-826
[7]   AN ADAPTIVE FINITE ELEMENT APPROXIMATION OF A VARIATIONAL MODEL OF BRITTLE FRACTURE [J].
Burke, Siobhan ;
Ortner, Christoph ;
Sueli, Endre .
SIAM JOURNAL ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, 2010, 48 (03) :980-1012
[8]   Non-linear version of stabilized conforming nodal integration for Galerkin mesh-free methods [J].
Chen, JS ;
Yoon, SP ;
Wu, CT .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2002, 53 (12) :2587-2615
[9]  
CORNELISSEN HAW, 1986, HERON, V31, P45, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ENGFRACMECH.2018.10.006
[10]   Linear and nonlinear solvers for variational phase-field models of brittle fracture [J].
Farrell, Patrick ;
Maurini, Corrado .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2017, 109 (05) :648-667