A meta-ethnography of shared decision-making in mental health care from the perspective of staff and service users

被引:1
作者
Cartwright, Claire [1 ]
Greenhill, Beth [1 ,3 ]
Griffiths, Alys Wyn [2 ]
Harrison, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Dept Primary Care & Mental Hlth, Liverpool, England
[2] Univ Sheffield, Dept Neurosci, Sheffield, England
[3] Univ Liverpool, Eleanor Rathbone Bldg,Bedford St South, Liverpool L69 7ZA, England
关键词
Shared decision making; Mental health; Staff; Service users; PSYCHIATRIC MEDICATION; PARTICIPATION; EXPERIENCES;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-024-11540-9
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundHuman rights, recovery, and value-based approaches are integral to strategic changes and development in mental health care. Successfully integrating such person-centred values in mental health services requires a paradigm shift from traditional biomedical models of care to a more human rights-based approach. An important aspect of this is shared decision making (SDM) between mental health staff and service users. Whilst it is widely acknowledged SDM leads to improved outcomes, there are barriers and challenges to implementing this approach effectively in clinical practice.ObjectivesThis systematic review aimed to assess existing empirical research exploring mental health service users and/or staff's attitudes towards and experiences of SDM in adult mental health care settings.MethodsThe review and protocol were registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023369472). Systematic searches were run on four databases. Search terms pertained to studies reporting on mental health staff or service users' experiences of SDM in adult mental health care. Initial searches yielded 721 results. Included studies were analysed using a meta-ethnographic approach.ResultsThirteen articles were included. Data were synthesised using meta ethnographic synthesis, which produced four higher order themes with related subthemes; the role of service user ownership, the influence of fluctuating capacity, the importance of therapeutic alliance and changing clinicians' behaviours and attitudes.ImplicationsBoth staff and service users found SDM to be an important factor in delivering high quality, effective mental health care. Despite this, participants had very little experience of implementing SDM in practice due to several personal, professional, and organisational challenges. This suggests that differences exist between what services strive towards achieving, and the experience of those implementing this in practice. These findings suggest that further research needs to be conducted to fully understand the barriers of implementing SDM in mental health services with training delivered to staff and service users about SDM.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Mental health professionals' perceived barriers and enablers to shared decision-making in risk assessment and risk management: a qualitative systematic review [J].
Ahmed, Nafiso ;
Barlow, Sally ;
Reynolds, Lisa ;
Drey, Nicholas ;
Begum, Fareha ;
Tuudah, Elizabeth ;
Simpson, Alan .
BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 21 (01)
[2]   Patients' experiences of assessment and detention under mental health legislation: systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis [J].
Akther, Syeda Ferhana ;
Molyneaux, Emma ;
Stuart, Ruth ;
Johnson, Sonia ;
Simpson, Alan ;
Oram, Sian .
BJPSYCH OPEN, 2019, 5 (03)
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1983, MENTAL HLTH ACT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, The Health and Social Care Act
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, MENTAL CAPACITY ACT
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Commissioning and Delivering Clinical Psychology in Acute Adult Mental Health Care: Guidance for Commissioners, Service Managers, Psychology Managers Practitioners
[7]   The principle of personhood: The field's transcendent principle [J].
Anthony, WA .
PSYCHIATRIC REHABILITATION JOURNAL, 2004, 27 (03) :205-205
[8]   Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions [J].
Aoki, Yumi ;
Yaju, Yukari ;
Utsumi, Tomohiro ;
Sanyaolu, Leigh ;
Storm, Marianne ;
Takaesu, Yoshikazu ;
Watanabe, Koichiro ;
Watanabe, Norio ;
Duncan, Edward ;
Edwards, Adrian G. K. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, (11)
[9]   Barriers and facilitators of shared decision making in acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia-Qualitative findings from the intervention group of a randomised-controlled trial [J].
Becher, Stefanie ;
Holzhueter, Fabian ;
Heres, Stephan ;
Hamann, Johannes .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2021, 24 (05) :1737-1746
[10]  
Boardman J., 2020, Brit J Psychiatr Int, V17