Creep deformation of viscoelastic lumbar tissue and its implication in biomechanical modeling of the lumbar spine

被引:0
作者
Kang, Sang Hyeon [1 ,2 ]
Mirka, Gary A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Ind & Mfg Syst Engn, Phys Ergon & Biomech Lab, Ames, IA USA
[2] Western Michigan Univ, Human Performance Inst, Dept Ind & Entrepreneurial Engn & Engn Management, Kalamazoo, MI USA
[3] Iowa State Univ, Dept Ind & Mfg Syst Engn, 3025 Black Engn, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词
Biomechanical model; Creep; Lumbar; Ligament; Muscle; CURVED MUSCLE MODEL; EMG-ASSISTED MODEL; STRESS-RELAXATION; LIGAMENTS; FLEXION; MOMENT; BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; INJURY; REGION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112595
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Creep in the viscoelastic tissues of the lumbar spine reduces the force-producing capability of these tissues. This study aimed to explore the impact of passive tissue creep on lumbar biomechanics. Sixteen participants performed controlled sagittally symmetric trunk flexion motions after a 30-minute protocol consisting of 12 min of full trunk flexion and 18 min of upright standing. Trunk kinematics and EMG activities of trunk muscles were captured as input variables in three biomechanical models: a) EMG-assisted model with no passive tissue (Active), b) EMG-assisted model with time-invariant passive tissue (No-Creep), and c) EMG-assisted model with time-variant passive tissue components (Creep). The mean absolute error (MAE) between the external moment and the estimated internal moment was calculated as a function of model type and trunk flexion. Results revealed no significant difference in MAE between the three models at 0-30 degrees trunk flexion but as the angle exceeded 30 degrees, the MAE of the No-Creep and Creep models were significantly smaller than that of the Active model. Beyond the trunk flexion angle of flexion-relaxation of erector spinae muscles, the MAE of the Creep model was significantly smaller than that of the No-Creep model (21.8 Nm vs. 40.3 Nm), leading to reduced compression and shear forces of the L4/L5 disc by 784.7 N (31.7 %) and 280.6 N (21.6 %) at full flexion. These results indicate the modulation of the time-dependent stiffness of passive tissues led to a more accurate prediction of the net internal moment at near full flexion postures, preventing overestimation of spinal loads.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effect of Stress on Intervertebral Disc and Facet Joint of Novel Lumbar Spine Soft Implant: Biomechanical Analysis
    Chen, Hong-liang
    Guo, Kai-jin
    Yuan, Feng
    Ding, Ning
    BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH-INDIA, 2014, 25 (02): : 199 - 202
  • [42] Reliability of the Biomechanical Assessment of the Sagittal Lumbar Spine and Pelvis on Radiographs Used in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Betz, Joseph W.
    Lightstone, Douglas F.
    Oakley, Paul A.
    Haas, Jason W.
    Moustafa, Ibrahim M.
    Harrison, Deed E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (16)
  • [43] A biomechanical comparison of posterior fixation approaches in lumbar fusion using computed tomography based lumbosacral spine modelling
    Ramakrishna, Vivek A. S.
    Chamoli, Uphar
    Larosa, Alessandro G.
    Mukhopadhyay, Subhas C.
    Prusty, B. Gangadhara
    Diwan, Ashish D.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART H-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE, 2023, 237 (02) : 243 - 253
  • [44] The effect of non -fusion dynamic stabilization on biomechanical responses of the implanted lumbar spine during whole -body vibration
    Fan, Wei
    Guo, Li-Xin
    COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2020, 192
  • [45] Biomechanics of the cervical spine Part 2. Cervical spine soft tissue responses and biomechanical modeling
    Yoganandan, N
    Kumaresan, S
    Pintar, FA
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2001, 16 (01) : 1 - 27
  • [46] Biomechanical properties of novel transpedicular transdiscal screw fixation with interbody arthrodesis technique in lumbar spine: A finite element study
    Lv, Qing-Bo
    Gao, Xiang
    Pan, Xiang-Xiang
    Jin, Hai-Ming
    Lou, Xiao-Ting
    Li, Shu-Min
    Yan, Ying-Zhao
    Wu, Cong-Cong
    Lin, Yan
    Ni, Wen-Fei
    Wang, Xiang-Yang
    Wu, Ai-Min
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRANSLATION, 2018, 15 : 50 - 58
  • [47] Dynamic Biomechanical Examination of the Lumbar Spine with Implanted Total Spinal Segment Replacement (TSSR) Utilizing a Pendulum Testing System
    Daniels, Alan H.
    Paller, David J.
    Koruprolu, Sarath
    Palumbo, Mark A.
    Crisco, Joseph J.
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (02):
  • [48] An EMG-assisted modeling approach to assess passive lumbar tissue loading in vivo during trunk bending
    Ning, Xiaopeng
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2017, 36 : 1 - 7
  • [49] Evaluation of Change in Muscle Activity as a Result of Posterior Lumbar Spine Surgery Using a Dynamic Modeling System
    Bresnahan, Lacey
    Fessler, Richard G.
    Natarajan, Raghu N.
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (16) : E761 - E767
  • [50] Multimodal Medical Imaging Fusion for Patient Specific Musculoskeletal Modeling of the Lumbar Spine System in Functional Posture
    Dao, Tien Tuan
    Pouletaut, Philippe
    Lazary, Aron
    Tho, Marie Christine Ho Ba
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 37 (05) : 739 - 749