Rapid large-scale building damage level classification after earthquakes using deep learning with Lidar and satellite optical data

被引:1
作者
Liu, Chang [1 ]
Ge, Linlin [2 ]
Bai, Ting [2 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Senseable City Lab, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Univ New South Wales, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Sydney, Australia
关键词
Post-earthquake; Lidar; building damage; deep learning;
D O I
10.1080/17538947.2024.2441934
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
In post-earthquake scenarios, the swift assessment of building damage levels is pivotal for efficient emergency response and recovery planning. Nevertheless, conventional in-situ damage evaluations consume time. Current satellite-based deep learning methods save time but often lack detail, usually classifying damage as either collapsed or intact. This two-level information is not enough for rescue or recovery planning. Light Detection and Ranging (Lidar)-based deep learning methods, which provide three-dimensional (3D) information, could address this issue of damage details. Therefore, this paper proposes a deep learning-based building damage level classification method using both Lidar and satellite data. The proposed method classifies damage into four levels, including no/minor damage, partially collapsed, totally collapsed, and story failure. The developed network builds upon RandLA-Net, incorporating surface normal vectors to enhance accuracy. A colourised Lidar dataset was created for the network. The network underscores the advantage of incorporating surface normal information. A framework is also proposed based on the damage level outcomes of the developed network, which aids in emergency response efforts. Consequently, this paper demonstrates the practical utility of deep learning networks in rapidly assessing detailed building damage levels after earthquakes. Its practical contribution is guiding decision-making during the critical phases of post-earthquake response and recovery.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Asia Air Survey Co. Ltd, 2018, Post-Kumamoto Earthquake (16 April 2016) Rupture Lidar Scan
[2]   Building damage assessment using airborne lidar [J].
Axel, Colin ;
van Aardt, Jan .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 11
[3]   Building damage assessment scale tailored to remote sensing vertical imagery [J].
Cotrufo, Silvana ;
Sandu, Constantin ;
Tonolo, Fabio Giulio ;
Boccardo, Piero .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 51 (01) :991-1005
[4]   Overview of the 2010 Haiti Earthquake [J].
DesRoches, Reginald ;
Comerio, Mary ;
Eberhard, Marc O. ;
Mooney, Walter ;
Rix, Glenn J. .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2011, 27 :S1-S21
[5]  
EOS Data Analytics, 2024, KOMPSAT 3/3A Satellite Images
[6]  
Fink S., 1986, Crisis management: Planning for the inevitable
[7]   RandLA-Net: Efficient Semantic Segmentation of Large-Scale Point Clouds [J].
Hu, Qingyong ;
Yang, Bo ;
Xie, Linhai ;
Rosa, Stefano ;
Guo, Yulan ;
Wang, Zhihua ;
Trigoni, Niki ;
Markham, Andrew .
2020 IEEE/CVF CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR 2020), 2020, :11105-11114
[8]   A novel and automatic framework for producing building damage map using post-event LiDAR data [J].
Janalipour, Milad ;
Mohammadzadeh, Ali .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2019, 39
[9]   Assessment of Convolutional Neural Network Architectures for Earthquake-Induced Building Damage Detection based on Pre- and Post-Event Orthophoto Images [J].
Kalantar, Bahareh ;
Ueda, Naonori ;
Al-Najjar, Husam A. H. ;
Halin, Alfian Abdul .
REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (21) :1-20
[10]  
Khodaverdi N, 2019, V3, P12, DOI [10.22059/eoge.2019.278307.1046, DOI 10.22059/EOGE.2019.278307.1046]