Patient preferences for CDK4/6 inhibitor treatments in HR+/HER2-early breast cancer: a discrete choice survey study

被引:0
|
作者
Mayer, Erica L. [1 ]
Smith, Mary Lou [2 ]
Guerin, Annie [3 ]
Latremouille-Viau, Dominick [3 ]
Hazra, Nisha C. [4 ]
Meng, Yan [4 ]
Qu, Wendi [3 ]
Bellefleur, Remi [3 ]
Ganapathy, Vaidyanathan [5 ]
Santarsiero, Liz [5 ]
Morlock, Robert [6 ]
Lustberg, Maryam B. [7 ]
机构
[1] Dana Farber Canc Inst, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Res Advocacy Network, Plano, TX USA
[3] Grp Anal Ltee, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Anal Grp Inc, London, England
[5] Novartis Pharmaceut, E Hanover, NJ USA
[6] YourCareChoice, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[7] Smilow Canc Hosp Yale New Haven, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
Patient preference; CDK4/6; inhibitor; Early breast cancer; Discrete choice experiment; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS APPLICATIONS; ADJUVANT ENDOCRINE THERAPY; INTERIM ANALYSIS; OPEN-LABEL; HEALTH; PALBOCICLIB; ONCOLOGIST; REGIMENS; STAGE;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-025-07627-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeAdding CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) to endocrine therapy (ET) for HR+/HER2- early breast cancer (EBC) demonstrated statistically significant invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) benefits in monarchE (node positive, high risk, stage II/III) and NATALEE (select N0 and all macroscopic N1, stage II/III). This study evaluated patient preferences for EBC treatment attributes and how these may translate for CDK4/6i selection.MethodsA web-based discrete choice experiment survey was conducted among US-based adult women with self-reported stage II/III HR+/HER2- EBC. Eight attributes were included, informed by 14 qualitative interviews (to identify most relevant attributes), expert clinical input, and differentiating features between CDK4/6is: efficacy (5-year iDFS), adverse events (venous thromboembolic event [VTE], diarrhea, fatigue), number of blood tests, number of electrocardiograms (EKGs), treatment duration, and schedule. Participants selected scenarios that best reflected their preferences from 10 choice cards, each displaying a pair of hypothetical treatment profiles. A conditional logit regression model was used to estimate preference weights and relative importance (RI) of attributes.ResultsA total of 409 women participated. Patient preferences, from high to low RI, were higher efficacy, lower diarrhea risk, lower fatigue risk, shorter treatment duration, and lower VTE risk. Number of blood tests, number of EKGs, and treatment schedule were less important. Utility scores were higher for reconstructed treatment profiles that resembled ribociclib.ConclusionThis study demonstrated that patients prefer adjuvant treatment with higher efficacy and lower risk of adverse events. These data will aid shared decision-making when discussing the addition of CDK4/6is to adjuvant ET for eligible patients with HR+/HER2- EBC.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 130
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient Preferences for HR+/HER2-Early Breast Cancer Adjuvant Treatment: A Multicountry Discrete Choice Experiment
    Harmer, Victoria
    Ammendolea, Cathy
    Ryan, Mandy
    Boyle, Frances
    Werutsky, Gustavo
    El Mouzain, Dina
    Marshall, Deborah A.
    Thomas, Caitlin
    Heidenreich, Sebastian
    Lu, Hui
    Krucien, Nicolas
    Payan, Juan Mora
    Aubel, Dawn
    Danyliv, Andriy
    Pathak, Purnima
    Harbeck, Nadia
    BREAST CARE, 2025, 20 (01)
  • [2] Efficacy and Safety of CDK4/6 Inhibitors: A Focus on HR+/HER2-Early Breast Cancer
    Klocker, Eva Valentina
    Egle, Daniel
    Bartsch, Rupert
    Rinnerthaler, Gabriel
    Gnant, Michael
    DRUGS, 2025, 85 (02) : 149 - 169
  • [3] Abemaciclib: a CDK4/6 inhibitor for the treatment of HR+/HER2-advanced breast cancer
    Corona, Silvia Paola
    Generali, Daniele
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2018, 12 : 321 - 330
  • [4] Efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy in HR+/HER2-breast cancer: an umbrella review
    Pu, Dongqing
    Xu, Debo
    Wu, Yue
    Chen, Hanhan
    Shi, Guangxi
    Feng, Dandan
    Zhang, Mengdi
    Liu, Zhiyong
    Li, Jingwei
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 150 (01)
  • [5] Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy with or without CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+/HER2-early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Zhihao
    Zhao, Xin
    Chen, Jie
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [6] The efficacy and safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone in the adjuvant treatment of patients with high-risk invasive HR+/HER2-early + /HER2-early breast cancer: A comprehensive updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Keskinkilic, Merve
    Arayici, Mehmet Emin
    Basbinar, Yasemin
    Ellidokuz, Hulya
    Yavuzsen, Tugba
    Oztop, Ilhan
    BREAST, 2024, 78
  • [7] Advancing treatment choices: CDK4/6 inhibitor switching in HR+/HER2-metastatic breast cancer
    Zagami, Paola
    Esposito, Angela
    Salimbeni, Beatrice Taurelli
    Giachetti, Pier Paolo Maria Berton
    Scafetta, Roberta
    Lambertini, Matteo
    Di Maio, Massimo
    Curigliano, Giuseppe
    Criscitiello, Carmen
    Cinieri, Saverio
    BREAST, 2025, 79
  • [8] Optimizing CDK4/6 inhibitors in advanced HR+/HER2-breast cancer: A personalized approach
    Fontanella, Caterina
    Giorgi, Carlo Alberto
    Russo, Stefania
    Angelini, Silvia
    Nicolardi, Linda
    Giarratano, Tommaso
    Frezzini, Simona
    Pestrin, Marta
    Palleschi, Dario
    Bolzonello, Silvia
    Parolin, Veronica
    Haspinger, Eva R.
    De Rossi, Costanza
    Greco, Filippo
    Gerratana, Lorenzo
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2022, 180
  • [9] Dalpiciclib. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor, Treatment of HR+/HER2-and HER2+advanced breast cancer
    Wang, Jingru
    Dong, Xiaotong
    Ashby, Charles R.
    Chen, Zhe-Sheng
    Zhang, Yunxiang
    DRUGS OF THE FUTURE, 2022, 47 (12) : 867 - 886
  • [10] HR+, HER2-Advanced Breast Cancer and CDK4/6 Inhibitors: Mode of Action, Clinical Activity, and Safety Profiles
    Sammons, Sarah L.
    Topping, Donna L.
    Blackwell, Kimberly L.
    CURRENT CANCER DRUG TARGETS, 2017, 17 (07) : 637 - 649