Risk factors in self-reported dissatisfied patients implanted with various presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses after cataract surgery

被引:0
作者
Jeon, Woosung [1 ,2 ]
Yoon, Chang Ho [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Oh, Joo Youn [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Choi, Hyuk Jin [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Kim, Mee Kum [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol, 103 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Biomed Res Inst, Lab Ocular Regenerat Med & Immunol, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Hosp Healthcare Syst Gangnam Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Dissatisfaction; Presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens; Near-vision discomfort; Photic disturbances; Preoperative myopia; Ocular aberrations; EXTENDED DEPTH; BILATERAL IMPLANTATION; PHOTIC PHENOMENA; TRIFOCAL IOL; OUTCOMES; FOCUS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12886-025-03912-4
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
BackgroundThis study aimed to investigate the self-reported dissatisfaction rates and associated risk factors among patients who underwent cataract surgery using different types of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs).MethodsThis retrospective case-control study analyzed the medical records in 340 eyes from 211 cataract surgery patients with presbyopia-correcting IOLs. The analyzed IOL types included bifocal (ReSTOR (R)), trifocal (PanOptix (R)), and extended depth-of-focus (EDOF; Symfony (R)) IOLs. The rates of self-reported dissatisfaction related to vision or photic disturbances were compared between these IOLs. Various factors, including sex, age, preoperative visual acuity and refractive status, and biometric indices, were analyzed to identify potential risk factors for dissatisfaction.ResultsThe overall dissatisfaction rate was 18.5% (63/340). Among the IOL types, Symfony (R)-implanted eyes had the highest rate of near-vision dissatisfaction, while PanOptix (R)-implanted eyes showed similar proportions of photic disturbances and near-vision discomfort. The major risk factor identified for overall dissatisfaction, regardless of IOL type, was preoperative myopia, which aligns with the risk factor for near discomfort. Meanwhile, the risk factors for photic phenomena were revealed to be thinner corneal thickness and greater corneal astigmatism. By IOL types, preoperative myopia caused near-vision discomfort in Symfony (R) eyes, whereas greater corneal astigmatism and thinner corneas were linked to photic disturbances in PanOptix (R) eyes.ConclusionsIt suggests that near-vision discomfort is related to myopic factors, whereas photic disturbances are associated with ocular aberrations. The types of dissatisfaction vary depending on the designs of presbyopia-correcting IOLs.Trial RegistrationThis retrospective study adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Seoul National University Hospital on March 13, 2023 (IRB No: 2303-025-1409).
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Patients' dissatisfaction with multifocal intraocular lenses managed by exchange with other multifocal lenses of different optical profiles [J].
Al-Shymali, Olena ;
McAlinden, Colm ;
Alio del Barrio, Jorge L. ;
Canto-Cerdan, Mario ;
Alio, Jorge L. .
EYE AND VISION, 2022, 9 (01)
[2]   Patient-Perceived and Laboratory-Measured Halos Associated with Diffractive Bifocal and Trifocal Intraocular Lenses [J].
Alba-Bueno, Francisco ;
Garzon, Nuria ;
Vega, Fidel ;
Poyales, Francisco ;
Millan, Maria S. .
CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2018, 43 (01) :35-42
[3]   Multifocal intraocular lenses: An overview [J].
Alio, Jorge L. ;
Plaza-Puche, Ana B. ;
Fernandez-Buenaga, Roberto ;
Pikkel, Joseph ;
Maldonado, Miguel .
SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 62 (05) :611-634
[4]   Optical aberrations in three different intraocular lens designs of a same platform [J].
Bartol-Puyal, Francisco A. ;
Gimenez, Galadriel ;
Altemir, Irene ;
Larrosa, Jose ;
Polo, Vicente ;
Pablo, Luis .
SAUDI JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 35 (02) :126-130
[5]   Visual results and subjective satisfaction after implantation of two different trifocal diffractive intraocular lenses models (AcrySof IQ PanOptix and AT LISA tri 839 MP) [J].
Boris, Malyugin ;
Olga, Fomina ;
Nikolay, Sobolev ;
Alexander, Belokopytov ;
Eliya, Levinger ;
Boris, Knyazer ;
Krauthammer, Mark ;
Yahalomi, Tal ;
Asaf, Achiron .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 34 (03) :726-733
[6]   Multifocal intraocular lenses: Relative indications and contraindications for implantation [J].
Braga-Mele, Rosa ;
Chang, David ;
Dewey, Steven ;
Foster, Gary ;
Henderson, Bonnie An ;
Hill, Warren ;
Hoffman, Richard ;
Little, Brian ;
Mamalis, Nick ;
Oetting, Thomas ;
Serafano, Donald ;
Talley-Rostov, Audrey ;
Vasavada, Abhay ;
Yoo, Sonia .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 40 (02) :313-322
[7]  
Breyer DRH, 2017, ASIA-PAC J OPHTHALMO, V6, P339, DOI 10.22608/APO.2017186
[8]   Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses for age-related cataract patients: a system review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials [J].
Cao, Kai ;
Friedman, David S. ;
Jin, Shanshan ;
Yusufu, Mayinuer ;
Zhang, Jingshang ;
Wang, Jinda ;
Hou, Simeng ;
Zhu, Guyu ;
Wang, Bingsong ;
Xiong, Ying ;
Li, Jing ;
Li, Xiaoxia ;
He, Hailong ;
Chai, Lijing ;
Wan, Xiu Hua .
SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 64 (05) :647-658
[9]   Visual Outcomes and Optical Quality of Accommodative, Multifocal, Extended Depth-of-Focus, and Monofocal Intraocular Lenses in Presbyopia-Correcting Cataract Surgery A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-analysis [J].
Cho, Jeong-Yeon ;
Won, Yeo Kyoung ;
Park, Jongyeop ;
Nam, Jin Hyun ;
Hong, Ji-Yoon ;
Min, Serim ;
Kim, Nahyun ;
Chung, Tae-Young ;
Lee, Eui-Kyung ;
Kwon, Sun-Hong ;
Lim, Dong Hui .
JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 140 (11) :1045-1053
[10]   Dissatisfaction after implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses [J].
de Vries, Niels E. ;
Webers, Carroll A. B. ;
Touwslager, Wouter R. H. ;
Bauer, Noel J. C. ;
de Brabander, John ;
Berendschot, Tos T. ;
Nuijts, Rudy M. M. A. .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 37 (05) :859-865