Impact of gout flare on health-related quality of life: a multi-center cross-sectional study in Thailand

被引:0
作者
Dilokthornsakul, Piyameth [1 ]
Louthrenoo, Worawit [2 ]
Chevaisrakul, Parawee [3 ]
Siripaitoon, Boonjing [4 ]
Jatuworapruk, Kanon [5 ]
Upakdee, Nilawan [6 ]
Buttham, Bodin [7 ]
Towiwat, Patapong [7 ]
机构
[1] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Pharm, Ctr Med & Hlth Technol Assessment CM HTA, Dept Pharmaceut Care, Chiang Mai, Thailand
[2] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Rheumatol, Chiang Mai, Thailand
[3] Mahidol Univ, Ramathibodi Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Internal Med, Bangkok, Thailand
[4] Prince Songkla Univ, Fac Med, Dept Internal Med, Songkhla, Thailand
[5] Thammasat Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med, Pathum Thani, Thailand
[6] Naresuan Univ, Fac Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Pharm Practice, Phitsanulok, Thailand
[7] Naresuan Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med, Phitsanulok 65000, Thailand
关键词
EQ-5D-5L; Gout; Gout flare; Health-related quality of life; Health utility; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1007/s10067-025-07339-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective Although the 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) instrument has been used to determine health-related quality of life and health utility in gout, it is used in comparing health utility among gout flare (GF) and non-gout flare (non-GF) patients is still limited. This study aimed to compare health utility among GF and non-GF patients in Thailand. Methods In this multi-center cross-sectional study, patients with GF and non-GF were interviewed for the EQ-5D5L and EQ-Visual Analog Scale (VAS) instruments by rheumatologists or trained research staffs. Patients with GF were subdivided into 2 subgroups (those who received no treatment and those who received treatment less than 48 h after GF episode). Results Two hundred and sixteen patients (108 GF and 108 non-GF patients), males in 90.28%, were included. The gout disease duration was significantly longer in the non-GF than in the GF groups (median, 10 vs 5 years; p = 0.004). There was no difference in the tophi present between the two groups. When compared with the non-GF group, the GF patients significantly had low health utility (0.34 +/- 0.36 vs. 0.89 +/- 0.15, p < 0.001) and EQ-VAS score (54.73 +/- 25.14 vs. 84.06 +/- 13.38, p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis of the non-GF group, there was insignificant health utility and EQ-VAS score between those with tophi and those without tophi (0.87 +/- 0.14 vs. 0.90 +/- 0.15, p = 0.124 and 83.36 +/- 14.92 vs. 84.33 +/- 12.83, p = 0.938, respectively). Conclusion This study found that GF clearly had a substantial impact on patients' quality of life. Targeted interventions in managing GF patients to improve their health outcomes are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:1317 / 1327
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Disease activity, resilience and health-related quality of life in Chinese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a multi-center, cross-sectional study
    Li Liu
    Xin Xu
    Neili Xu
    Lie Wang
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 15
  • [2] Disease activity, resilience and health-related quality of life in Chinese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a multi-center, cross-sectional study
    Liu, Li
    Xu, Xin
    Xu, Neili
    Wang, Lie
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2017, 15
  • [3] Evaluating instruments for assessing healthspan: a multi-center cross-sectional study on health-related quality of life (HRQL) and frailty in the companion dog
    Frances L. Chen
    Tarini V. Ullal
    Jessica L. Graves
    Ellen R. Ratcliff
    Alexander Naka
    Brennen McKenzie
    Tennery A. Carttar
    Kaitlyn M. Super
    Jessica Austriaco
    Sunny Y. Weber
    Julie Vaughn
    Michael L. LaCroix-Fralish
    GeroScience, 2023, 45 : 2089 - 2108
  • [4] Evaluating instruments for assessing healthspan: a multi-center cross-sectional study on health-related quality of life (HRQL) and frailty in the companion dog
    Chen, Frances L.
    Ullal, Tarini V.
    Graves, Jessica L.
    Ratcliff, Ellen R.
    Naka, Alexander
    McKenzie, Brennen
    Carttar, Tennery A.
    Super, Kaitlyn M.
    Austriaco, Jessica
    Weber, Sunny Y.
    Vaughn, Julie
    LaCroix-Fralish, Michael L.
    GEROSCIENCE, 2023, 45 (04) : 2089 - 2108
  • [5] Health-related quality of life in patients with alveolar echinococcosis: a cross-sectional study
    Schmidberger, Julian
    Weimer, Henriette
    Schlingeloff, Patrycja
    Kratzer, Wolfgang
    Gruener, Beate
    Barth, Thomas F. E.
    Baumann, Sven
    Henne-Bruns, Doris
    Graeter, Tilmann
    Hillenbrand, Andreas
    Kaltenbach, Tanja
    Theis, Frauke
    INFECTION, 2019, 47 (01) : 67 - 75
  • [6] The impact of the metabolic syndrome on health-related quality of life: a cross-sectional study in Greece
    Tziallas, Dimitrios
    Kastanioti, Catherine
    Kostapanos, Michael S.
    Skapinakis, Petros
    Elisaf, Moses S.
    Mavreas, Venetsanos
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2012, 11 (03) : 297 - 303
  • [7] Health-related quality of life in patients with lymphoedema - a cross-sectional study
    Klernas, Pia
    Johnsson, Aina
    Horstmann, Vibeke
    Johansson, Karin
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES, 2018, 32 (02) : 634 - 644
  • [8] Health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction in patients with gout: results from a cross-sectional study in a managed care setting
    Khanna, Puja P.
    Shiozawa, Aki
    Walker, Valery
    Bancroft, Tim
    Essoi, Breanna
    Akhras, Kasem S.
    Khanna, Dinesh
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2015, 9 : 971 - 981
  • [9] Health-Related Quality of Life and Related Factors in Patients with Fibromyalgia: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Jafari, Fatemeh
    Mobini, Maryam
    Moradi, Siavash
    Dargahloo, Saeed Dashti
    Ghafour, Ideh
    Elyasi, Forouzan
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2022, 16 (01)
  • [10] A cross-sectional study on perceived workplace health support and health-related quality of life
    Kurogi, Kazushirou
    Ikegami, Kazunori
    Eguchi, Hisashi
    Tsuji, Mayumi
    Tateishi, Seiichiro
    Nagata, Tomohisa
    Matsuda, Shinya
    Fujino, Yoshihisa
    Ogami, Akira
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH, 2021, 63 (01)