The persian version of mhealth app usability questionnaire (MAUQ) for patients: a psychometric assessment study

被引:0
作者
Moulaei, Khadijeh [1 ,2 ]
Dinari, Fatemeh [3 ]
Sheikhtaheri, Abbas [4 ]
Bahaadinbeigy, Kambiz [3 ]
Hajesmaeel-Gohari, Sadrieh [3 ]
机构
[1] Iran Univ Med Sci, Hlth Management Res Inst, Hlth Management & Econ Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[2] Smart Univ Med Sci, Artificial Intelligence Med Sci Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[3] Kerman Univ Med Sci, Inst Futures Studies Hlth, Med Informat Res Ctr, Kerman, Iran
[4] Iran Univ Med Sci, Sch Hlth Management & Informat Sci, Dept Hlth Informat Management, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Iranian version of MAUQ; mHealth; Questionnaire validation; Reliability; Usability; ECONOMIC BURDEN; OSTEOPOROSIS;
D O I
10.1186/s12911-025-02882-3
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionThe growing importance of mobile apps in osteoporosis management highlights the crucial need for evaluating their utility and usability, particularly for Osteoporosis support apps. Addressing this need, the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ) was crafted in four different versions, categorized based on the nature of the app (interactive or standalone) and the intended user (patient or provider). Due to its usage by diverse users with varying languages, this questionnaire requires psychometric assessment in multiple languages. This study aimed to translate and validate the Persian version of MAUQ for patients.MethodAfter translating the standalone and interactive versions of MAUQ into the Persian language, face validity, content validity, and factor analysis were conducted. Ten patients with osteoporosis were involved for face validity, and ten experts in medical informatics and health information technology were invited to assess content validity by completing a questionnaire. A total of 99 patients with osteoporosis participated in the factor analysis. The reliability of the questionnaires was assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha.ResultsThe face validity and the content of the Persian version of MAUQ were confirmed. Factor analysis of the standalone version of MAUQ showed 18 items in three dimensions: easy to use (7 items), user interface and satisfaction (6 items), and usefulness (5 items). Factor analysis of the interactive version of MAUQ showed 21 items in two dimensions: easy to use and satisfaction (11 items) and information arrangement and usefulness (10 items). The Cronbach's alpha of the questionnaire for standalone and interactive applications was 0.90.ConclusionThe psychometric assessment of the Persian MAUQ established its validity and reliability among osteoporosis patients, affirming its efficacy as a robust tool for evaluating mHealth app usability.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Abasi S, 2021, Effectiveness of mobile health-based self-management application for posttransplant cares: a systematic review, V4, P434
  • [2] Aghaee N, 2013, Revised Selected Papers, V10, P44
  • [3] A participatory process to design an app to improve adherence to anti-osteoporotic therapies: A development and usability study
    Angelucci, Alessandra
    Pongiglione, Benedetta
    Bernasconi, Sara
    Carrone, Flaminia
    Mazziotti, Gherardo
    Costantino, Maria Laura
    Aliverti, Andrea
    Compagni, Amelia
    [J]. DIGITAL HEALTH, 2023, 9
  • [4] Barton AJJBm, 2012, The regulation of mobile health applications, V10, P1
  • [5] Bohmer Matthias, 2010, P 12 INT C HUM COMP, P195, DOI 10.1145/1851600.1851633
  • [6] Brown IIIW, 2013, Assessment of the Health IT Usability Evaluation Model (Health-ITUEM) for evaluating mobile health (mHealth) technology, V46, P1080
  • [7] User-Centered Design Research: Case Study of Baby Bottle Sterilizer Design
    Cao, Ying
    Chen, Chen
    [J]. ADVANCES IN AFFECTIVE AND PLEASURABLE DESIGN, 2020, 952 : 113 - 124
  • [8] Coursaris C, 2004, Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce (QJEC), P51
  • [9] Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297
  • [10] A Causal Framework for Cross-Cultural Generalizability
    Deffner, Dominik
    Rohrer, Julia M.
    McElreath, Richard
    [J]. ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 5 (03)