Evaluating students' learning achievements using the formative assessment technique: a retrospective study

被引:0
作者
Sirianansopa, Kantisa [1 ]
机构
[1] Prince Songkla Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pediat, Div Pulm Med, Hat Yai, Thailand
关键词
Formative assessments; Summative assessments; Normalised gain method; Undergraduate medical education; Learning achievement; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-024-06347-5
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Formative assessment promotes positive learning outcomes and evaluates students over time. We aimed to evaluate students' learning achievements after implementing a formative assessment technique by using a normalised gain method. Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted at the School of Medicine and Health Science, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand. There were 118 fifth-year medical students who attended a general pediatric course in the 2021-2022 academic year. Results: In the summative assessment, the post-test scores were significantly greater than the pretest scores (mean difference 20.53, 95% CI (18.63-22.44), P < 0.001). The median value of the overall student learning gain (g) was 0.34 (0.23, 0.45). Students with medium gains had significantly higher scores than those with low gains (P < 0.001). Students' learning gains had a positive correlation with post-test scores. (R = 0.6, P = 0.01). Conclusions: The formative assessment technique is a valuable method for enhancing students' learning outcomes by offering timely and effective feedback through mentoring systems. It is essential to integrate formative assessments into standard assessment strategies in undergraduate medical education.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Arja Sateesh Babu, 2018, MedEdPublish (2016), V7, P131, DOI 10.15694/mep.2018.0000131.1
  • [2] Begum N., 2017, BANGLA J MED ED, V4, P16, DOI [10.3329/bjme.v4i1.32191, DOI 10.3329/BJME.V4I1.32191]
  • [3] Feedback in the clinical setting
    Burgess, Annette
    van Diggele, Christie
    Roberts, Chris
    Mellis, Craig
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 20 (Suppl 2)
  • [4] Clark ER, COMPENDIUM EFFECTIVE, V2, P6
  • [5] The effectiveness of formative assessment in pathophysiology education from students' perspective: a questionnaire study
    Cong, Xin
    Zhang, Yan
    Xu, Hai
    Liu, Li-Mei
    Zheng, Ming
    Xiang, Ruo-Lan
    Wang, Jin-Yu
    Jia, Shi
    Cai, Jing-Yi
    Liu, Cheng
    Wu, Li-Ling
    [J]. ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2020, 44 (04) : 726 - 733
  • [6] Das S., 2017, ASIAN J MED SCI, V8, P38, DOI DOI 10.3126/AJMS.V8I4.17161
  • [7] Mentorship of US Medical Students: a Systematic Review
    Farkas, Amy H.
    Allenbaugh, Jill
    Bonifacino, Eliana
    Turner, Rose
    Corbelli, Jennifer A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 34 (11) : 2602 - 2609
  • [8] Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses
    Hake, RR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1998, 66 (01) : 64 - 74
  • [9] Van De Ridder JMM., 2023, AJBSR, V19, P19, DOI [10.34297/AJBSR.2023.19.002542, DOI 10.34297/AJBSR.2023.19.002542]
  • [10] Quantifying teaching quality in medical education: The impact of learning gain calculation
    Westphale, Silke
    Backhaus, Joy
    Koenig, Sarah
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2022, 56 (03) : 312 - 320