Benchmarking protein language models for protein crystallization

被引:0
|
作者
Mall, Raghvendra [1 ]
Kaushik, Rahul [1 ]
Martinez, Zachary A. [2 ]
Thomson, Matt W. [2 ]
Castiglione, Filippo [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Technol Innovat Inst, Biotechnol Res Ctr, POB 9639, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
[2] CALTECH, Div Biol & Bioengn, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[3] Natl Res Council Italy, Inst Appl Comp, I-00185 Rome, Italy
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2025年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
Open protein language models (PLMs); Protein crystallization; Benchmarking; Protein generation; PROPENSITY PREDICTION; REFINEMENT;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-025-86519-5
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The problem of protein structure determination is usually solved by X-ray crystallography. Several in silico deep learning methods have been developed to overcome the high attrition rate, cost of experiments and extensive trial-and-error settings, for predicting the crystallization propensities of proteins based on their sequences. In this work, we benchmark the power of open protein language models (PLMs) through the TRILL platform, a be-spoke framework democratizing the usage of PLMs for the task of predicting crystallization propensities of proteins. By comparing LightGBM / XGBoost classifiers built on the average embedding representations of proteins learned by different PLMs, such as ESM2, Ankh, ProtT5-XL, ProstT5, xTrimoPGLM, SaProt with the performance of state-of-the-art sequence-based methods like DeepCrystal, ATTCrys and CLPred, we identify the most effective methods for predicting crystallization outcomes. The LightGBM classifiers utilizing embeddings from ESM2 model with 30 and 36 transformer layers and 150 and 3000 million parameters respectively have performance gains by 3-\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$5\%$$\end{document} than all compared models for various evaluation metrics, including AUPR (Area Under Precision-Recall Curve), AUC (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve), and F1 on independent test sets. Furthermore, we fine-tune the ProtGPT2 model available via TRILL to generate crystallizable proteins. Starting with 3000 generated proteins and through a step of filtration processes including consensus of all open PLM-based classifiers, sequence identity through CD-HIT, secondary structure compatibility, aggregation screening, homology search and foldability evaluation, we identified a set of 5 novel proteins as potentially crystallizable.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] How to ... enhance the success of protein crystallization
    Chayen, Naomi E.
    ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA A-FOUNDATION AND ADVANCES, 2016, 72 : S173 - S173
  • [32] Upside Down Protein Crystallization.
    Chayen, Naomi
    Khurshid, Sahir
    ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA A-FOUNDATION AND ADVANCES, 2010, 66 : S294 - S294
  • [33] Protein crystallization: Specific phenomena and general insights on crystallization kinetics
    Rosenberger, F
    THEORETICAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF CRYSTAL GROWTH, 1998, 276-2 : 241 - 256
  • [34] Nonclassical nucleation pathways in protein crystallization
    Zhang, Fajun
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-CONDENSED MATTER, 2017, 29 (44)
  • [35] Counterdiffusion methods applied to protein crystallization
    Otalora, Fermin
    Antonio Gavira, Jose
    Ng, Joseph D.
    Manuel Garcia-Ruiz, Juan
    PROGRESS IN BIOPHYSICS & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2009, 101 (1-3) : 26 - 37
  • [36] Which strategy for a protein crystallization project?
    Kundrot, CE
    CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR LIFE SCIENCES, 2004, 61 (05) : 525 - 536
  • [37] Which strategy for a protein crystallization project?
    C. E. Kundrot
    Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS, 2004, 61 : 525 - 536
  • [38] Protein models: The Grand Challenge of protein docking
    Anishchenko, Ivan
    Kundrotas, Petras J.
    Tuzikov, Alexander V.
    Vakser, Ilya A.
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2014, 82 (02) : 278 - 287
  • [39] Morphological Population Balance Models for the Dynamic Evolution of Particle Shape and Size Distribution in Protein Crystallization
    Liu, Jing J.
    Ma, Cai Y.
    Hu, Yang D.
    Wang, Xue Z.
    10TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PROCESS SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2009, 27 : 1911 - 1916
  • [40] Hydrophilic Polymers as Efficient Protein Surface Shielding Agents in Protein Crystallization.
    Hasek, Jindrich
    Skalova, Tereza
    Duskova, Jarmila
    Dohnalek, Jan
    Kolenko, Petr
    Koval, Tomas
    Stepankova, Andrea
    ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA A-FOUNDATION AND ADVANCES, 2009, 65 : S155 - S156