Uncertain significance and molecular insights of CPLANE1 variants in prenatal diagnosis of Joubert syndrome: a case report

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Si-Xiu [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Leiting [2 ]
Deng, Chen [3 ]
Tang, Dongmei [4 ]
Zhang, Jing [1 ]
Hu, Wen-Guang [1 ]
Hu, Yu [5 ]
Lai, Hua [3 ]
Yang, Xiao [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Chengdu Womens & Childrens Cent Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Pediat Neurol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Inst Elect & Informat Engn UESTC Guangdong, Dongguan 523808, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Chengdu Womens & Childrens Cent Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Chengdu Womens & Childrens Cent Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Obstet, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Chengdu Womens & Childrens Cent Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Prenatal Diag, Chengdu, Peoples R China
关键词
Prenatal diagnosis; Variants of uncertain significance; Molecular effects; Gene expression; CPLANE1; gene; Joubert syndrome; CONGENITAL-ANOMALIES;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-024-07052-3
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background Prenatal whole exome sequencing (WES) is becoming an increasingly used diagnostic tool for fetuses with structural anomalies. However, the identification of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in clinically relevant genes can significantly complicate prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling. Case presentation A fetus conceived through in vitro fertilization at the third attempt presented with polydactyly and molar tooth sign at 24 + 6 weeks of gestation. Trio-based WES was performed on both parents and the affected fetus, revealing a pair of compound heterozygous CPLANE1 variants (c.4646 A > T/p.Glu1549Val and c.1233 C > A/p.Tyr411*) potentially associated with Joubert syndrome. According to the ACMG guidelines, one of the biallelic variants was classified as VUS, and the other as pathogenic. However, these variants had no allele frequencies in the general population. The p.Tyr411* variant was classified as deleterious, while the p.Glu1549Val variant was located in highly conserved residues, was predicted to be damaging by in silico tools, and altered hydrogen bonding. Furthermore, CPLANE1 expression was highest in the brain during the embryonic and fetal stages. These findings provide additional support for the association between CPLANE1 variants in this fetus and Joubert syndrome. Thus, the most likely diagnosis was Joubert syndrome, and after careful consideration, the couple decided to terminate the pregnancy. Conclusion The expression patterns of CPLANE1 and the molecular effects of the variants may provide further evidence supporting the potential for prenatal diagnosis of Joubert syndrome in the case of biallelic VUS and pathogenic variant. This study suggests that molecular insights may play a role in interpreting VUS in clinically relevant prenatal genes for prenatal diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biallelic intragenic tandem duplication of CPLANE1 in Joubert syndrome: A case report
    Martinez-Granero, Francisco
    Martinez-Cayuelas, Elena
    Rodilla, Cristina
    Nunez-Moreno, Gonzalo
    de Alba, Marta Rodriguez
    Blanco-Kelly, Fiona
    Romero, Raquel
    Minguez, Pablo
    Ayuso, Carmen
    Lorda-Sanchez, Isabel
    Corton, Marta
    Almoguera, Berta
    CLINICAL GENETICS, 2023, 103 (04) : 448 - 452
  • [2] Clinical heterogeneity and intrafamilial variability of Joubert syndrome in two siblings with CPLANE1 variants
    Zhang, Xiujuan
    Shen, Yue
    Li, Ping
    Cai, Ruikun
    Lu, Chao
    Li, Qian
    Chen, Cuixia
    Yu, Yufei
    Cheng, Tingting
    Wang, Xian
    Luo, Minna
    Cao, Muqing
    Cao, Zongfu
    Ma, Xu
    MOLECULAR GENETICS & GENOMIC MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (06):
  • [3] Novel compound heterozygous CPLANE1 variants identified in a Chinese family with Joubert syndrome
    Zhang, Cheng
    Sun, Zhenchao
    Xu, Lulu
    Che, Fengyuan
    Liu, Shiguo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 81 (06) : 529 - 538
  • [4] Unveiling the Pathogenic Role of Novel CPLANE1 Compound Heterozygous Variants in Joubert Syndrome: Insights Into mRNA Stability and NMD Pathway
    Hong, Zhidan
    Xiang, Sheng
    Chen, Zhiying
    Qiu, Xueping
    Zhang, Li
    Ma, Ling
    Wang, Mei
    JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE, 2025, 29 (05)
  • [5] Prenatal diagnosis of Joubert syndrome: a case report
    Aslan, H
    Ulker, V
    Gulcan, EM
    Numanoglu, C
    Gul, A
    Agar, M
    Ark, HC
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2002, 22 (01) : 13 - 16
  • [6] Exome sequencing and RNA analysis identify two novel CPLANE1 variants causing Joubert syndrome
    Fei, Hongjun
    Wu, Yi
    Wang, Yanlin
    Zhang, Junyu
    MOLECULAR GENETICS & GENOMIC MEDICINE, 2022, 10 (03):
  • [7] Prenatal diagnosis of Joubert syndrome: A case report and literature review
    Zhu, Lingling
    Xie, Limei
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (51)
  • [8] Non-classic splicing mutation in the CPLANE1 (C5orf42) gene cause Joubert syndrome in a fetus with severe craniocerebral dysplasia
    Zhu, Haiyan
    Chen, Wangyang
    Ren, He
    Zhang, Yunshan
    Niu, Yanyan
    Wu, Di
    Jiang, Lin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2021, 64 (06)
  • [9] Novel CPLANE1 c.8948dupT (p.P2984Tfs*7) variant in a child patient with Joubert syndrome
    Wang, Huiping
    Nie, Wensha
    Wang, Chunxia
    Wang, Zuohua
    Zheng, Yuxia
    OPEN LIFE SCIENCES, 2023, 18 (01):
  • [10] Novel mutations in the ciliopathy-associated gene CPLANE1 (C5orf42) cause OFD syndrome type VI rather than Joubert syndrome
    Bonnard, Carine
    Shbourl, Mohammad
    Tonekaboni, Seyed Hassan
    Ng, Alvin Yu Jin
    Tohari, Sumanty
    Ghosh, Kakaly
    Lai, Angeline
    Lim, Jiin Ying
    Tan, Ene Choo
    Devisme, Louise
    Stichelbout, Morgane
    Alkindi, Adila
    Banu, Nazreen
    Yuksel, Zafer
    Ghoumid, Jamal
    Elkhartoufi, Nadia
    Boutaud, Lucile
    Micalizzi, Alessia
    Brett, Maggie Siewyan
    Venkatesh, Byrappa
    Valente, Enza Maria
    Attie-Bitach, Tania
    Reversade, Bruno
    Kariminejad, Ariana
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2018, 61 (10) : 585 - 595