Characterization of antixenosis and antibiosis resistance to the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith) in maize

被引:0
|
作者
Pamidi, Lakshmi Soujanya [1 ]
Sekhar, J. C. [1 ]
Yathish, K. R. [1 ]
Karjagi, Chikkappa G. [2 ]
Rao, K. Sankara [1 ]
Suby, S. B. [2 ]
Rakshit, Sujay [3 ]
机构
[1] ICAR Indian Inst Maize Res, Winter Nursery Ctr, Hyderabad 500030, India
[2] ICAR Indian Inst Maize Res IIMR, Delhi Unit, Pusa Campus, New Delhi 110012, India
[3] ICAR Indian Inst Agr Biotechnol, Ranchi 834003, India
关键词
Antixenosis; Antibiosis; Fall armyworm; Maize; Resistance categories; GGE biplot; CORN-BORER LEPIDOPTERA; LEAF-FEEDING DAMAGE; LARVAE LEPIDOPTERA; PLANT-RESISTANCE; HOST PLANTS; NOCTUIDAE; OVIPOSITION; EARWORM; ZEA; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s12600-024-01228-5
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Fall armyworm (FAW) Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) is an invasive insect pest that poses a severe threat to maize production affecting the livelihood and food security of small holder farmers in African and Asian countries. Host plant resistance is one of the potential methods for FAW management in a sustainable manner. Identification of genotypes with different categories of resistance is important to diversify the basis of resistance to FAW. This study aimed to characterize the antixenosis and antibiosis resistance through oviposition, developmental and survival parameters of FAW on 16 diverse maize genotypes. Antixenosis was assayed under no-choice and multi-choice conditions, while antibiosis was assayed in bioassays in which larvae were reared on leaf tissue. Genotype CML 336 showed strong antixenosis both under no-choice and multi-choice conditions while the genotypes DMRE 63, CML 59, CML 60, CML 70, and CML 501 exhibited antixenosis under multi-choice conditions. Genotypes CML 122, CML 330, CML 332 and CML 337 showed antibiosis characteristics and resulted in prolonged duration of the larval period. Further, the low larval survival (%), larval weight, and pupal weight when fed on DMRE 63 indicated that antibiosis could be conferring resistance to FAW. Based on GGE biplot analysis, the resistant genotypes (DMRE 63, CML 70, CML 337, and CML 122) were grouped along with group one parameters namely larval period and pupal period. The present study provides information on different categories of resistance in maize genotypes and results could be used in breeding programmes focusing on maize resistance to FAW.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Potential of Silicon to Improve Biological Control of Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda on Maize
    Zimba, Kennedy J.
    Read, Quentin D.
    Haseeb, Muhammad
    Meagher, Robert L.
    Legaspi, Jesusa C.
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (09):
  • [32] Farmer perception of impacts of fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda JE Smith) and transferability of its management practices in Uganda
    Kalyebi, Andrew
    Otim, Michael H.
    Walsh, Tom
    Tay, Wee Tek
    CABI AGRICULTURE & BIOSCIENCE, 2023, 4 (01):
  • [33] Resistance of rice genotypes to fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
    Teixeira Silva, Cinthia Luzia
    Correa, Fernanda
    de Sousa Almeida, Andre Cirilo
    Araujo, Marcio da Silva
    de Freitas Barrigossi, Jose Alexandre
    de Jesus, Flavio Goncalves
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENTOMOLOGIA, 2021, 65 (03)
  • [34] Effect of host plants on the biology and nutritional indices of fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
    Nandhini, D.
    Deshmukh, Sharanabasappa S.
    Kalleshwaraswamy, C. M.
    Satish, K. M.
    Sannathimmappa, H. G.
    ANIMAL BIOLOGY, 2023, 73 (02) : 153 - 170
  • [35] Sustainable management of fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith): challenges and proposed solutions from an African perspective
    Nyamutukwa, Shingirayi
    Mvumi, Brighton M.
    Chinwada, Peter
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEST MANAGEMENT, 2022, : 676 - 694
  • [36] Invasion of fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) in India: nature, distribution, management and potential impact
    Suby, S. B.
    Soujanya, P. Lakshmi
    Yadava, Pranjal
    Patil, Jagadeesh
    Subaharan, K.
    Prasad, G. Shyam
    Babu, K. Srinivasa
    Jat, S. L.
    Yathish, K. R.
    Vadassery, Jyothilakshmi
    Kalia, Vinay K.
    Bakthavatsalam, N.
    Shekhar, J. C.
    Rakshit, Sujay
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2020, 119 (01): : 44 - 51
  • [37] Susceptibility of fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith) to microbial and botanical bioinsecticides and control failure likelihood estimation
    Ahissou, Besmer Regis
    Sawadogo, Wendneyide Mathieu
    Dabire, Gaston Tobdem
    Kambire, Fabekoure Cedric
    Bokonon-Ganta, Aime H.
    Somda, Irenee
    Verheggen, Francois J.
    BIOTECHNOLOGIE AGRONOMIE SOCIETE ET ENVIRONNEMENT, 2022, 26 (03): : 136 - 140
  • [38] Climate-related risk to maize crops in China from Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda
    Urhausen, Steffi
    Bradshaw, Catherine D.
    Davie, Jemma
    Eyre, Dominic
    Hemming, Deborah
    Li, Hongmei
    Taylor, Bryony
    Zhang, Feng
    JOURNAL OF PEST SCIENCE, 2024, : 959 - 972
  • [39] Harnessing the power of weather-based forecasting ARIMAX model for predicting fall armyworm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith), and infestation in maize
    Srinivasan, T.
    Sadhana, V.
    Shanmugam, P. S.
    Baskaran, V.
    Shanthi, M.
    Murugan, M.
    Prakash, K.
    Sivakumar, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TROPICAL INSECT SCIENCE, 2025, 45 (01) : 91 - 99
  • [40] Biocontrol-based management of fall armyworm,Spodoptera frugiperda(J E Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on Indian Maize
    Varshney, Richa
    Poornesha, B.
    Raghavendra, A.
    Lalitha, Y.
    Apoorva, V
    Ramanujam, B.
    Rangeshwaran, R.
    Subaharan, K.
    Shylesha, A. N.
    Bakthavatsalam, N.
    Chaudhary, Malvika
    Pandit, Vinod
    JOURNAL OF PLANT DISEASES AND PROTECTION, 2021, 128 (01) : 87 - 95