Development of PDAC diagnosis and prognosis evaluation models based on machine learning

被引:0
|
作者
Xiao, Yingqi [2 ]
Sun, Shixin [1 ]
Zheng, Naxin [1 ]
Zhao, Jing [1 ]
Li, Xiaohan [1 ]
Xu, Jianmin [1 ]
Li, Haolian [1 ]
Du, Chenran [1 ]
Zeng, Lijun [1 ]
Zhang, Juling [1 ]
Yin, Xiuyun [1 ]
Huang, Yuan [1 ]
Yang, Xuemei [1 ]
Yuan, Fang [1 ]
Jia, Xingwang [2 ]
Li, Boan [1 ]
Li, Bo [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Med Ctr 5, Dept Clin Lab, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Elect Power Teaching Hosp, Dept Clin Lab, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
北京市自然科学基金;
关键词
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; Machine learning; DeepSurv; Prognosis prediction; Individualized treatment recommendation; PANCREATIC-CANCER; CA19-9;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-025-13929-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundPancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is difficult to detect early and highly aggressive, often leading to poor patient prognosis. Existing serum biomarkers like CA19-9 are limited in early diagnosis, failing to meet clinical needs. Machine learning (ML)/deep learning (DL) technologies have shown great potential in biomedicine. This study aims to establish PDAC differential diagnosis and prognosis assessment models using ML combined with serum biomarkers for early diagnosis, risk stratification, and personalized treatment recommendations, improving early diagnosis rates and patient survival.MethodsThe study included serum biomarker data and prognosis information from 117 PDAC patients. ML models (Random Forest (RF), Neural Network (NNET), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM)) were used for differential diagnosis, evaluated by accuracy, Kappa test, ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity. COX proportional hazards model and DeepSurv DL model predicted survival risk, compared by C-index and Log-rank test. Based on DeepSurv's risk predictions, personalized treatment recommendations were made and their effectiveness assessed.ResultsEffective PDAC diagnosis and prognosis models were built using ML. The validation set data shows that the accuracy of the RF, NNET, SVM, and GBM models are 84.21%, 84.21%, 76.97%, and 83.55%; the sensitivity are 91.26%, 90.29%, 89.32%, and 88.35%; and the specificity are 69.39%, 71.43%, 51.02%, and 73.47%. The Kappa values are 0.6266, 0.6307, 0.4336, and 0.6215; and the AUC are 0.889, 0.8488, 0.8488, and 0.8704, respectively. BCAT1, AMY, and CA12-5 were selected as modeling parameters for the prognosis model using COX regression. DeepSurv outperformed the COX model on both training and validation sets, with C-indexes of 0.738 and 0.724, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves indicate that personalized treatment recommendations based on DeepSurv can help patients achieve survival benefits.ConclusionThis study built efficient PDAC diagnosis and prognosis models using ML, improving early diagnosis rates and prognosis accuracy. The DeepSurv model excelled in prognosis prediction and successfully guided personalized treatment recommendations and supporting PDAC clinical management.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development and validation of machine learning models for diagnosis and prognosis of cancer by urinary proteomics, based on the FLEMENGHO cohort
    Wang, Shuncong
    Wei, Dongmei
    Zhao, Yanling
    Pang, Xin
    Zhang, Zhenyu
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 14 (02):
  • [2] Development of machine learning models for diagnosis of glaucoma
    Kim, Seong Jae
    Cho, Kyong Jin
    Oh, Sejong
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (05):
  • [3] Supervised machine learning models applied to disease diagnosis and prognosis
    Mariani, Maria C.
    Tweneboah, Osei K.
    Bhuiyan, Md Al Masum
    AIMS PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 6 (04): : 405 - 423
  • [4] Development and validation of machine learning models for diagnosis and prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma, and immune infiltration analysis
    Lin, Lin
    Bao, Yongxia
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [5] Predicting CTS Diagnosis and Prognosis Based on Machine Learning Techniques
    Elseddik, Marwa
    Mostafa, Reham R.
    Elashry, Ahmed
    El-Rashidy, Nora
    El-Sappagh, Shaker
    Elgamal, Shimaa
    Aboelfetouh, Ahmed
    El-Bakry, Hazem
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (03)
  • [6] Special Issue "Advances in Machine Learning and Deep Learning Based Machine Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis"
    Djeziri, Mohand
    Bendahan, Marc
    PROCESSES, 2021, 9 (03)
  • [7] Machine Learning-based Prediction Models for Diagnosis and Prognosis in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Systematic Review
    Nguyen, Nghia H.
    Picetti, Dominic
    Dulai, Parambir S.
    Jairath, Vipul
    Sandborn, William J.
    Ohno-Machado, Lucila
    Chen, Peter L.
    Singh, Siddharth
    JOURNAL OF CROHNS & COLITIS, 2022, 16 (03): : 398 - 413
  • [8] Machine Learning Models for Image-Based Diagnosis and Prognosis of COVID-19: Systematic Review
    Montazeri, Mahdieh
    ZahediNasab, Roxana
    Farahani, Ali
    Mohseni, Hadis
    Ghasemian, Fahimeh
    JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2021, 9 (04)
  • [9] Purine metabolite-based machine learning models for risk prediction, prognosis, and diagnosis of coronary artery disease
    Jung, Sunhee
    Ahn, Eunyong
    Koh, Sang Baek
    Lee, Sang-Hak
    Hwang, Geum-Sook
    BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2021, 139
  • [10] Machine Learning for Improved Diagnosis and Prognosis in Healthcare
    Maity, Niharika G.
    Das, Sreerupa
    2017 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE, 2017,