Mixed Methods Research Centering on Minoritized Students in Higher Education: A Literature Review

被引:1
作者
Hutson, Bryant L. [1 ]
He, Ye [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Inst Res & Assessment, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Univ North Carolina Greensboro, Teacher Educ & Higher Educ, Greensboro, NC 27402 USA
关键词
Minoritized students; Higher education; Mixed methods research; Mixed methods appraisal tool; AFRICAN-AMERICAN STUDENTS; METHODS APPRAISAL TOOL; COLLEGE-STUDENTS; RACIAL IDENTITY; QUALITY; ACHIEVEMENT; CRITERIA; RACE;
D O I
10.1007/s10755-024-09748-y
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The increasing diversity among higher education students urges researchers to expand research methodologies beyond traditional quantitative approaches. A growing number of higher education researchers have employed mixed methods research (MMR) approaches in studies centering on minoritized student populations. In this review, we identified and analyzed 72 empirical MMR studies published between 2007 and 2023, describing the characteristics of the research design and focusing on the MMR design strategies employed by the authors. The review details specific MMR strategies, including methods for engaging participants, integrating quantitative and qualitative data, and advancing the research agenda that centers minoritized students. Based on the review, we discuss methodological considerations and offer recommendations for higher education professionals to advance more thoughtfully conscious, student-centered modes of knowledge production focusing on minoritized populations.
引用
收藏
页码:1051 / 1076
页数:26
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Digest of Educational Statistics
[2]   Questioning the Science: How Quantitative Methodologies Perpetuate Inequity in Higher Education [J].
Arellano, Lucy .
EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (02)
[3]   Views and experiences of using advanced technologies in higher education of healthcare professionals: A systematic mixed-method review [J].
Atout, Maha ;
Nalubega, Sylivia .
FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2023, 8
[4]  
Baker-Doyle K., 2015, TEACHER ED Q, V42, P3
[5]   Systematic review methodology in higher education [J].
Bearman, Margaret ;
Smith, Calvin D. ;
Carbone, Angela ;
Slade, Susan ;
Baik, Chi ;
Hughes-Warrington, Marnie ;
Neumann, David L. .
HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 31 (05) :625-640
[6]   The effectiveness of peer mentoring in promoting a positive transition to higher education for first-year undergraduate students: A mixed methods systematic review protocol [J].
Carragher J. ;
McGaughey J. .
Systematic Reviews, 5 (1)
[7]   Should We Exclude Inadequately Reported Studies From Qualitative Systematic Reviews? An Evaluation of Sensitivity Analyses in Two Case Study Reviews [J].
Carroll, Christopher ;
Booth, Andrew ;
Lloyd-Jones, Myfanwy .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2012, 22 (10) :1425-1434
[8]  
Casanova S, 2018, TEACH COLL REC, V120
[9]   Barriers and Facilitators of Robot-Assisted Education in Higher Education: A Systematic Mixed-Studies Review [J].
Chou, Hui Shan ;
Thong, Lay Teng ;
Chew, Han Shi Jocelyn ;
Lau, Ying .
TECHNOLOGY KNOWLEDGE AND LEARNING, 2023, 28 (02) :477-516
[10]   Racisms in Qualitative Inquiry: Recognitions and Challenges [J].
Collins, Donald R. ;
Cannella, Gaile S. .
QUALITATIVE INQUIRY, 2021, 27 (10) :1139-1145