A qualitative investigation of the influences of gender among low-socioeconomic status students' motivations to study biology

被引:0
作者
Masjutina, Svetlana [1 ]
Stearns, Elizabeth [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Charlotte, Publ Policy Program, Charlotte, NC USA
[2] Univ North Carolina Charlotte, Dept Sociol, Publ Policy Program, 9201 Univ City Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STEM EDUCATION | 2025年 / 12卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Motivations to study biology; Low-income students in biology; Gender differences in motivation; Interview study of biology students; SCIENCE IDENTITY; COLLEGE MAJOR; OCCUPATIONAL CHOICES; SOCIAL-CLASS; AM I; SCHOOL; ACHIEVEMENT; TECHNOLOGY; WOMEN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1186/s40594-025-00531-9
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
BackgroundStudents from low-socioeconomic status backgrounds (LSES) are underrepresented in STEM education, including in the biological sciences. As one of the foundational STEM disciplines, biology represents an interesting case study in that women earn the most undergraduate degrees, a trend that holds across racial/ethnic groups. However, there is a limited understanding about the backgrounds, personality characteristics, and preferences of undergraduates who choose to pursue a biology major, especially those from LSES backgrounds and whether there are gender differences among those students.ResultsUsing interview data from LSES students who were participants in an externally funded scholarship program, we found that personal interests, positive learning experiences, and particularly medical career opportunities were highly influential for shaping major-related choices for LSES students, comparable to the motivations seen among biology students from all demographic groups. Yet the ways LSES men and women translated their preferences and motivations into biology majors were divergent, which highlights the unique perspectives and challenges of LSES students along their motivational trajectories. For instance, positive interactions with teachers played a significant role in supporting scientific interests of LSES students of both genders. For LSES men, these experiences were mostly related to engaging academic content, while explicit encouragement and support from teachers was particularly impactful for LSES women. Additionally, LSES students frequently chose biology majors because of the perceived preparation for a certain career, either in medical or non-medical fields. We observed that these motivational factors were more salient for LSES men than for women. In contrast, LSES women often found both medical and non-medical careers appealing due to their interest in doing scientific research.ConclusionsOur analysis of LSES students' motivational pathways to biology majors revealed that while intrinsic motivations are crucial for the development of their scientific and career interests, engagement with, and belonging to the field, extrinsic motivations-driven by personal, cultural, and economic factors-cannot be overlooked. Understanding this gendered dynamic and interplay between these motivational types is essential for designing programs and policies that aim to increase the representation of LSES students in biology, a field critical to environmental conservation and societal welfare.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 131 条
  • [1] Socioeconomic differences in reading trajectories: The contribution of family, neighborhood, and school contexts
    Aikens, Nikki L.
    Barbarin, Oscar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 100 (02) : 235 - 251
  • [2] Measuring attitudes towards biology major and non-major: Effect of students' gender, group composition, and learning environment
    Almasri, Firas
    Hewapathirana, Gertrude I.
    Ghaddar, Fatme
    Lee, Nick
    Ibrahim, Bashar
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (05):
  • [3] American Psychological Association, 2017, Ethnic and racial minorities & socioeconomic status
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2020, The Classification of Instructional Programs
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2023, About us
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2022, Digest of Education Statistics
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2022, Community college STEM pathways [Fact sheet]
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2021, SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2022, Science and Engineering Indicators 2022
  • [10] Is Science Me? High School Students' Identities, Participation and Aspirations in Science, Engineering, and Medicine
    Aschbacher, Pamela R.
    Li, Erika
    Roth, Ellen J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2010, 47 (05) : 564 - 582