Essential Considerations for Free Energy Calculations of RNA-Small Molecule Complexes: Lessons from the Theophylline-Binding RNA Aptamer

被引:1
作者
Rasouli, Ali [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pickard, Frank C. [1 ]
Sur, Sreyoshi [1 ]
Grossfield, Alan [4 ]
Bennett, Mehtap Isik [1 ]
机构
[1] Moderna Inc, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Theoret & Computat Biophys Grp, NIH Ctr Macromol Modeling & Bioinformat, Beckman Inst Adv Sci & Technol,Dept Biochem, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Ctr Biophys & Quantitat Biol, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[4] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Rochester, NY 14620 USA
关键词
CONFORMATIONAL-CHANGES; FORCE-FIELD; DYNAMICS; DISCRIMINATION; INTEGRATION; ACCURACY; LEAD;
D O I
10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01505
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Alchemical free energy calculations are widely used to predict the binding affinity of small molecule ligands to protein targets; however, the application of these methods to RNA targets has not been deeply explored. We systematically investigated how modeling decisions affect the performance of absolute binding free energy calculations for a relatively simple RNA model system: theophylline-binding RNA aptamer with theophylline and five analogs. The goal of this investigation was 2-fold: (1) understanding the performance levels we can expect from absolute free energy calculations for a simple RNA complex and (2) learning about practical modeling considerations that impact the success of RNA-binding predictions, which may be different from the best practices established for protein targets. We learned that magnesium ion (Mg2+) placement is a critical decision that impacts affinity predictions. When information regarding Mg2+ positions is lacking, implementing RNA backbone restraints is an alternative way of stabilizing the RNA structure that recapitulates prediction accuracy. Since mistakes in Mg2+ placement can be detrimental, omitting magnesium ions entirely and using RNA backbone restraints are attractive as a risk-mitigating approach. We found that predictions are sensitive to modeling experimental buffer conditions correctly, including salt type and ionic strength. We explored the effects of sampling in the alchemical protocol, choice of the ligand force field (GAFF2/OpenFF Sage), and water model (TIP3P/OPC) on predictions, which allowed us to give practical advice for the application of free energy methods to RNA targets. By capturing experimental buffer conditions and implementing RNA backbone restraints, we were able to compute binding affinities accurately (mean absolute error (MAE) = 2.2 kcal/mol, Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.9, Kendall's tau = 0.7). We believe there is much to learn about how to apply free energy calculations for RNA targets and how to enhance their performance in prospective predictions. This study is an important first step for learning best practices and special considerations for RNA-ligand free energy calculations. Future studies will consider increasingly complicated ligands and diverse RNA systems and help the development of general protocols for therapeutically relevant RNA targets.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 239
页数:17
相关论文
共 73 条
[61]   CONFORMATIONAL-CHANGES OF TRANSFER-RNA - ROLE OF MAGNESIUM(II) [J].
STEIN, A ;
CROTHERS, DM .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 1976, 15 (01) :160-168
[62]  
STRAATSMA TP, 1992, ANNU REV PHYS CHEM, V43, P407
[63]   Calculation of absolute free energy of binding for theophylline and its analogs to RNA aptamer using nonequilibrium work values [J].
Tanida, Yoshiaki ;
Ito, Masakatsu ;
Fujitani, Hideaki .
CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 337 (1-3) :135-143
[64]   Alchemical free energy calculations via metadynamics: Application to the theophylline-RNA aptamer complex [J].
Tanida, Yoshiaki ;
Matsuura, Azuma .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2020, 41 (20) :1804-1819
[65]   REVERSIBLE MULTIPLE TIME SCALE MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS [J].
TUCKERMAN, M ;
BERNE, BJ ;
MARTYNA, GJ .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1992, 97 (03) :1990-2001
[66]   End-Point Binding Free Energy Calculation with MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA: Strategies and Applications in Drug Design [J].
Wang, Ercheng ;
Sun, Huiyong ;
Wang, Junmei ;
Wang, Zhe ;
Liu, Hui ;
Zhang, John Z. H. ;
Hou, Tingjun .
CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 2019, 119 (16) :9478-9508
[67]   RNA therapeutics on the rise [J].
Wang, Feng ;
Zuroske, Travis ;
Watts, Jonathan K. .
NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2020, 19 (07) :441-442
[68]   Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations [J].
Wang, Junmei ;
Wang, Wei ;
Kollman, Peter A. ;
Case, David A. .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR GRAPHICS & MODELLING, 2006, 25 (02) :247-260
[69]   Refinement of the Cornell et al. Nucleic Acids Force Field Based on Reference Quantum Chemical Calculations of Glycosidic Torsion Profiles [J].
Zgarbova, Marie ;
Otyepka, Michal ;
Sponer, Jiri ;
Mladek, Arnost ;
Banas, Pavel ;
Cheatham, Thomas E., III ;
Jurecka, Petr .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2011, 7 (09) :2886-2902
[70]   RNA-ligand molecular docking: Advances and challenges [J].
Zhou, Yuanzhe ;
Jiang, Yangwei ;
Chen, Shi-Jie .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COMPUTATIONAL MOLECULAR SCIENCE, 2022, 12 (03)