Stimulation Parameters Recruit Distinct Cortico-Cortical Pathways: Insights from Microstate Analysis on TMS-Evoked Potentials

被引:0
作者
Lucarelli, Delia [1 ,2 ]
Guidali, Giacomo [3 ]
Sulcova, Dominika [4 ]
Zazio, Agnese [1 ]
Bonfiglio, Natale Salvatore [5 ]
Stango, Antonietta [1 ]
Barchiesi, Guido [6 ]
Bortoletto, Marta [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Ist Ctr San Giovanni Dio Fatebenefratelli, Neurophysiol Lab, Brescia, Italy
[2] Univ G dAnnunzio, Dept Neurosci Imaging & Clin Sci, Chieti, Pescara, Italy
[3] Univ Milano Bicocca, Milan Ctr Neurosci Neuromi, Dept Psychol, Milan, Italy
[4] Inst Cognit & Affect Neurosci, MSH Med Sch Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
[5] IRCCS Ist Ctr San Giovanni Dio Fatebenefratelli, Stat Serv, Brescia, Italy
[6] Univ Milan, Dept Philosophy, Milan, Italy
[7] IMT Sch Adv Studies Lucca, Mol Mind Lab, Lucca, Italy
关键词
TMS-EEG; Motor cortex; Connectivity; Microstates; TMS-evoked potentials; Current direction; Pulse waveform; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; EFFECTIVE CONNECTIVITY; CORTICAL REACTIVITY; CURRENT DIRECTIONS; CURRENT FLOW; WAVE-FORM; EEG; INHIBITION; BRAIN;
D O I
10.1007/s10548-025-01113-2
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-evoked potentials (TEPs) represent an innovative measure for examining brain connectivity and developing biomarkers of psychiatric conditions. Minimizing TEP variability across studies and participants, which may stem from methodological choices, is therefore vital. By combining classic peak analysis and microstate investigation, we tested how TMS pulse waveform and current direction may affect cortico-cortical circuit engagement when targeting the primary motor cortex (M1). We aim to disentangle whether changing these parameters affects the degree of activation of the same neural circuitry or may lead to changes in the pathways through which the induced activation spreads. Thirty-two healthy participants underwent a TMS-EEG experiment in which the pulse waveform (monophasic, biphasic) and current direction (posterior-anterior, anterior-posterior, latero-medial) were manipulated. We assessed the latency and amplitude of M1-TEP components and employed microstate analyses to test differences in topographies. Results revealed that TMS parameters strongly influenced M1-TEP components' amplitude but had a weaker role over their latencies. Microstate analysis showed that the current direction in monophasic stimulations changed the pattern of evoked microstates at the early TEP latencies, as well as their duration and global field power. This study shows that the current direction of monophasic pulses may modulate cortical sources contributing to TEP signals, activating neural populations and cortico-cortical paths more selectively. Biphasic stimulation reduces the variability associated with current direction and may be better suited when TMS targeting is blind to anatomical information.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 104 条
  • [1] Simulation of transcranial magnetic stimulation in head model with morphologically-realistic cortical neurons
    Aberra, Aman S.
    Wang, Boshuo
    Grill, Warren M.
    Peterchev, Angel V.
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2020, 13 (01) : 175 - 189
  • [2] Pinging the brain with transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals cortical reactivity in time and space
    Ahn, Sangtae
    Frohlich, Flavio
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2021, 14 (02) : 304 - 315
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2021, About Us
  • [4] Awiszus F, 2003, SUPPL CLIN NEUROPHYS, V56, P13
  • [5] Predicting Alzheimer's disease severity by means of TMS-EEG coregistration
    Bagattini, Chiara
    Mutanen, Tuomas P.
    Fracassi, Claudia
    Manenti, Rosa
    Cotelli, Maria
    Ilmoniemi, Risto J.
    Miniussi, Carlo
    Bortoletto, Marta
    [J]. NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING, 2019, 80 : 38 - 45
  • [6] Bates D., 2018, Lme4: Mixed-effects modeling with r
  • [7] Methodological Choices Matter: A Systematic Comparison of TMS-EEG Studies Targeting the Primary Motor Cortex
    Beck, Mikkel Malling
    Heyl, Marieke
    Mejer, Louise
    Vinding, Mikkel C.
    Christiansen, Lasse
    Tomasevic, Leo
    Siebner, Hartwig Roman
    [J]. HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2024, 45 (15)
  • [8] TMS-EEG signatures of glutamatergic neurotransmission in human cortex
    Belardinelli, Paolo
    Konig, Franca
    Liang, Chen
    Premoli, Isabella
    Desideri, Debora
    Mueller-Dahlhaus, Florian
    Gordon, Pedro Caldana
    Zipser, Carl
    Zrenner, Christoph
    Ziemann, Ulf
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [9] Characterizing and minimizing the contribution of sensory inputs to TMS-evoked potentials
    Biabani, Mana
    Fornito, Alex
    Mutanen, Tuomas P.
    Morrow, James
    Rogasch, Nigel C.
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2019, 12 (06) : 1537 - 1552
  • [10] Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cortical evoked potentials: A TMS/EEG co-registration study
    Bonato, C.
    Miniussi, C.
    Rossini, P. M.
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 117 (08) : 1699 - 1707