The digitalization of emergency department triage: the perspectives of health professionals and patients

被引:0
作者
Morlotti, Chiara [1 ]
Cattaneo, Mattia [1 ]
Paleari, Stefano [1 ]
Manelli, Filippo [2 ]
Locati, Francesco [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bergamo, Dept Management Informat & Prod Engn, Via Pasubio 7-B, I-24027 Dalmine, BG, Italy
[2] ASST Bergamo Est, Via Paderno 21, I-24068 Seriate, BG, Italy
[3] ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Piazza OMS 1, I-24127 Bergamo, BG, Italy
关键词
Digitalization; Emergency department; Digital health; Triage; Stated preferences; Choice modeling; OF-CARE; INFORMATION; PRIVACY; MANAGEMENT; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-024-11862-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundDigitalization in the healthcare sector offers several organizational advantages, ranging from enhanced service quality to cost savings. However, its adoption often progresses slowly and faces challenges, especially in critical settings like emergency departments, requiring prompt, clear, and efficient communication. As such, this study aims to comprehensively assess the factors influencing the preference for digitalized tools over traditional methods from the perspectives of both service providers and users.MethodsWe employ two ad hoc stated preference surveys in which we ask respondents to reveal their preference in simulated triage scenarios. Three main alternatives are proposed: traditional procedures, a fully digitalized solution with no direct patient-professional interaction, and a hybrid option that combines traditional and digital aspects. Scenarios and alternatives vary according to predetermined attributes, selected among the features acknowledged to impact the triage efficiency and efficacy: the possibility to communicate in a known language, the completeness of information retrieved from the patient, the time dedicated to triage activity, and the level of privacy. Responses are analyzed by means of discrete choice models.ResultsOur findings reveal a preference for the hybrid approach, wherein patients use digital tools to input relevant information, followed by an interview with healthcare professionals. Nevertheless, distinct alternative- and case-specific features can favor the preference toward other kinds of triage. Respondents prefer shorter triage times and the opportunity to interact in a known language, while the level of privacy does not significantly impact their choices. Interestingly, the presence of an algorithm assigning urgency code diminishes the probability that healthcare professionals select the fully digitalized option.ConclusionsThis study provides important insight into the utilization of digital tools in emergency departments. The results can be used by hospital managers and policy makers to develop digital tools that meet the needs of both users and healthcare professionals. This, in turn, may result in cost savings and improved quality of service.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Latent classes associated with the intention to use a symptom checker for self-triage [J].
Aboueid, Stephanie ;
Meyer, Samantha B. ;
Wallace, James ;
Chaurasia, Ashok .
PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (11)
[2]   Digitized patient-provider interaction: How does it matter? A qualitative meta-synthesis [J].
Andreassen, Hege K. ;
Dyb, Kari ;
May, Carl R. ;
Pope, Catherine J. ;
Warth, Line L. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2018, 215 :36-44
[3]   What factors influence emergency department staff attitudes towards using information technology? [J].
Ayatollahi, Haleh ;
Bath, Peter A. ;
Goodacre, Steve ;
Lo, Su Yung ;
Draegebo, Morten ;
Khan, Faheem A. .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2013, 30 (04) :303-307
[4]   Emergency department triage performance timing. A regional multicenter descriptive study in Italy [J].
Bambi, Stefano ;
Ruggeri, Marco ;
Sansolino, Sandra ;
Gabellieri, Massimo ;
Tellini, Sabrina ;
Giusti, Monica ;
Ciulli, Elisa ;
Franchi, Federica ;
Petrocchi, Laura ;
Olivi, Mauro ;
Gravili, Raffaele Carlo ;
Biancalana, Paola ;
Millanti, Andrea ;
Martini, Luca ;
Sgrevi, Paola .
INTERNATIONAL EMERGENCY NURSING, 2016, 29 :32-37
[5]   Handheld Point-of-Care Ultrasound Probes: The New Generation of POCUS [J].
Baribeau, Yanick ;
Sharkey, Aidan ;
Chaudhary, Omar ;
Krumm, Santiago ;
Fatima, Huma ;
Mahmood, Feroze ;
Matyal, Robina .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2020, 34 (11) :3139-3145
[6]   Comparison of the auditory and visual privacy of emergency department treatment areas with curtains versus those with solid walls [J].
Barlas, D ;
Sama, AE ;
Ward, MF ;
Lesser, ML .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 38 (02) :135-139
[7]   Covid-19 triage in the emergency department 2.0: how analytics and AI transform a human-made algorithm for the prediction of clinical pathways [J].
Bartenschlager, Christina ;
Grieger, Milena ;
Erber, Johanna ;
Neidel, Tobias ;
Borgmann, Stefan ;
Vehreschild, Joerg J. ;
Steinbrecher, Markus ;
Rieg, Siegbert ;
Stecher, Melanie ;
Dhillon, Christine ;
Ruethrich, Maria ;
Jakob, Carolin E. M. ;
Hower, Martin ;
Heller, Axel ;
Vehreschild, Maria ;
Wyen, Christoph ;
Messmann, Helmut ;
Piepel, Christiane ;
Brunner, Jens ;
Hanses, Frank ;
Roemmele, Christoph ;
LEOSS Study Grp .
HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2023, 26 (03) :412-429
[8]   Electronic health records, adoption, quality of care, legal and privacy issues and their implementation in emergency departments [J].
Ben-Assuli, Ofir .
HEALTH POLICY, 2015, 119 (03) :287-297
[9]   Information and communication in the emergency department [J].
Blackburn, Joanna ;
Ousey, Karen ;
Goodwin, Emma .
INTERNATIONAL EMERGENCY NURSING, 2019, 42 :30-35
[10]   Digital technologies in the public-health response to COVID-19 [J].
Budd, Jobie ;
Miller, Benjamin S. ;
Manning, Erin M. ;
Lampos, Vasileios ;
Zhuang, Mengdie ;
Edelstein, Michael ;
Rees, Geraint ;
Emery, Vincent C. ;
Stevens, Molly M. ;
Keegan, Neil ;
Short, Michael J. ;
Pillay, Deenan ;
Manley, Ed ;
Cox, Ingemar J. ;
Heymann, David ;
Johnson, Anne M. ;
McKendry, Rachel A. .
NATURE MEDICINE, 2020, 26 (08) :1183-1192