Comparison of neck angle and musculoskeletal discomfort of surgeon in cataract surgery between three-dimensional heads-up display system and conventional microscope

The three-dimensional heads-up display system (3D HUDS) is increasingly utilized by ophthalmologists and suggested to offer ergonomic benefits compared to conventional operating microscopes. We aimed to quantitatively assess the surgeon's neck angle and musculoskeletal discomfort during cataract surgery using commercially available 3D HUDS and conventional microscope. In this single-center comparative observational study, the surgeon conducted routine phacoemulsification surgeries using Artevo (R) 800 and Opmi Lumera (R) 700 (both from Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). The surgeon's intraoperative neck angle was measured using the Cervical Range of Motion device. Postoperative musculoskeletal discomfort was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score after each surgery. A total of 80 cataract surgeries were analyzed, with 40 using Artevo (R) 800 and 40 using Opmi Lumera (R) 700. The neck angle was extended when using Artevo (R) 800 and flexed when using Opmi Lumera (R) 700 during continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC), phacoemulsification, and intraocular lens (IOL) placement (- 8.18 +/- 2.85 degrees vs. 8.27 +/- 2.93 degrees in CCC, - 7.83 +/- 3.30 degrees vs. 8.87 +/- 2.83 degrees in phacoemulsification, - 7.43 +/- 3.80 degrees vs. 7.67 +/- 3.73 degrees in IOL placement, respectively; all p < 0.001). The VAS score was significantly lower in surgeries performed with Artevo (R) 800 (1.27 +/- 0.55 vs. 1.73 +/- 0.64, p < 0.001). The findings suggest that 3D HUDS help reduce neck flexion and lower work-related musculoskeletal discomfort through ergonomic improvements.