The efficacy of ciprofol versus propofol on anesthesia in patients undergoing endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:0
作者
Liu, Jikai [1 ]
Hong, Aonan [2 ]
Zeng, Jinfang [3 ]
Liang, Xiao [3 ]
机构
[1] Jiangnan Univ, Wuxi Sch Med, Wuxi, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Chinese Med, Affiliated Hosp, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Nantong Univ, Jiangnan Univ, Wuxi 2 Peoples Hosp, Wuxi Clin Coll,Med Ctr,Dept Anesthesiol, 68 Zhongshan Rd, Wuxi 214002, Peoples R China
来源
BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY | 2024年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Ciprofol- endoscopy-propofol- meta-analysis-randomized controlled trials; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1186/s12871-024-02721-4
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
IntroductionCiprofol is a new intravenous anesthetic with a similar chemical structure to propofol. We aimed to compare the incidence of adverse actions like injection pain and time indexes of ciprofol versus propofol on anesthesia in patients undergoing endoscopy. We also compared anesthetists' satisfaction during the procedure.MethodsTwo independent researchers (Liu and Zeng) searched the Cochrane Library, Embase databases, and PubMed for controlled clinical trials. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed with the Review Manager, Stata and the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 tool to evaluate methodological quality. Relative risks with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for outcomes.ResultsTen trials, including 1545 patients, were examined in the current meta-analysis. During anesthesia in patients undergoing endoscopy, the incidence of injection pain was significantly reduced in the research group. Compared with propofol, the pooled risk difference (RD) with the use of ciprofol for injection pain for all the procedures was - 0.34 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.48 to 0.19), and RR for hypotension was 0.73(95% CI:0.58 to 0.92). GRADE showed this meta-analysis has moderate or low confidence. Trial sequential analysis for mortality indicated insufficient sample size for a definitive judgment for lower incidence of hypotension.ConclusionIn painless endoscopy, compared with propofol, ciprofol exhibited non-inferiority anesthesia/sedation in patients, and had a good safety profile with a lower incidence of pain on injection and may reduce the chance of hypotension. Trial sequential analysis suggested the need for more cases, and GRADE highlighted moderate certainty, emphasizing the necessity for further targeted RCTs.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO, CRD42023433627.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Aggressive versus controlled fluid resuscitation in acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    He, Kun
    Gao, Lin
    Yang, Zihan
    Zhang, Yuelun
    Hua, Tianrui
    Hu, Wenmo
    Wu, Dong
    Ke, Lu
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 136 (10) : 1166 - 1173
  • [32] Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 3 randomized controlled trials
    Cai, Ze-Lin
    Yang, Hui-Ting
    Huang, Ting
    Yu, Zhuo-Ran
    Ren, Ning
    Su, Jing-Yang
    Lin, Xian-Lei
    Zhou, He-Ran
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 13 (08): : 3266 - +
  • [33] Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Sintilimab for Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Ye, Ziqi
    Yang, Wenchao
    Xuan, Bixia
    Li, Xiaofang
    He, Jiana
    Si, Haiyan
    Ma, Wenhua
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [34] Efficacy and tolerability of minocycline augmentation therapy in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Oya, Kazuto
    Kishi, Taro
    Iwata, Nakao
    HUMAN PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2014, 29 (05) : 483 - 491
  • [35] Efficacy and acceptability of psilocybin for primary or secondary depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Fang, Shuping
    Yang, Xin
    Zhang, Wei
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 15
  • [36] Efficacy and tolerability of aripiprazole once monthly for schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Oya, Kazuto
    Kishi, Taro
    Iwata, Nakao
    NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT, 2015, 11 : 2299 - 2307
  • [37] Safety and effectiveness of adding fentanyl or sufentanil to spinal anesthesia: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Fonseca, Neuber Martins
    Guimaraes, Gabriel Magalhaes Nunes
    Pontes, Joao Paulo Jordao
    Azi, Liana Maria Torres de
    Oliveira, Ricardo de Avila
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 73 (02): : 198 - 216
  • [38] The efficacy and safety of tezepelumab in the treatment of uncontrolled asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lin, Fei
    Yu, Bin
    Deng, Bowen
    He, Rong
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (32) : E34746
  • [39] Efficacy of rasagiline monotherapy for early Parkinson disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chang, Hao-Yun
    Li, Ying-Yu
    Hong, Chien-Tai
    Kuan, Yi-Chun
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 36 (06) : 704 - 714
  • [40] A systematic review of dexmethylphenidate versus placebo in child and adolescent ADHD: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials
    Maneeton, N.
    Maneeton, B.
    Woottiluk, P.
    Suttajit, S.
    Charnsil, C.
    Srisurapanont, M.
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 25 : S642 - S642