The efficacy of ciprofol versus propofol on anesthesia in patients undergoing endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:0
作者
Liu, Jikai [1 ]
Hong, Aonan [2 ]
Zeng, Jinfang [3 ]
Liang, Xiao [3 ]
机构
[1] Jiangnan Univ, Wuxi Sch Med, Wuxi, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Chinese Med, Affiliated Hosp, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Nantong Univ, Jiangnan Univ, Wuxi 2 Peoples Hosp, Wuxi Clin Coll,Med Ctr,Dept Anesthesiol, 68 Zhongshan Rd, Wuxi 214002, Peoples R China
来源
BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY | 2024年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Ciprofol- endoscopy-propofol- meta-analysis-randomized controlled trials; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1186/s12871-024-02721-4
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
IntroductionCiprofol is a new intravenous anesthetic with a similar chemical structure to propofol. We aimed to compare the incidence of adverse actions like injection pain and time indexes of ciprofol versus propofol on anesthesia in patients undergoing endoscopy. We also compared anesthetists' satisfaction during the procedure.MethodsTwo independent researchers (Liu and Zeng) searched the Cochrane Library, Embase databases, and PubMed for controlled clinical trials. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed with the Review Manager, Stata and the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 tool to evaluate methodological quality. Relative risks with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for outcomes.ResultsTen trials, including 1545 patients, were examined in the current meta-analysis. During anesthesia in patients undergoing endoscopy, the incidence of injection pain was significantly reduced in the research group. Compared with propofol, the pooled risk difference (RD) with the use of ciprofol for injection pain for all the procedures was - 0.34 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.48 to 0.19), and RR for hypotension was 0.73(95% CI:0.58 to 0.92). GRADE showed this meta-analysis has moderate or low confidence. Trial sequential analysis for mortality indicated insufficient sample size for a definitive judgment for lower incidence of hypotension.ConclusionIn painless endoscopy, compared with propofol, ciprofol exhibited non-inferiority anesthesia/sedation in patients, and had a good safety profile with a lower incidence of pain on injection and may reduce the chance of hypotension. Trial sequential analysis suggested the need for more cases, and GRADE highlighted moderate certainty, emphasizing the necessity for further targeted RCTs.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO, CRD42023433627.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The efficacy and safety of menatetrenone in the management of osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Su, S.
    He, N.
    Men, P.
    Song, C.
    Zhai, S.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 30 (06) : 1175 - 1186
  • [22] Clinical Outcomes of Bivalirudin Versus Heparin in Elderly Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Meng, Shaoke
    Xu, Jiaying
    Guo, Lei
    Huang, Rongchong
    CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS AND THERAPY, 2020, 34 (01) : 101 - 111
  • [23] The efficacy and safety of menatetrenone in the management of osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    S. Su
    N. He
    P. Men
    C. Song
    S. Zhai
    Osteoporosis International, 2019, 30 : 1175 - 1186
  • [24] Treatment efficacy for pharyngeal Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Kong, Fabian Y. S.
    Hatzis, Christina L.
    Lau, Andrew
    Williamson, Deborah A.
    Chow, Eric P. F.
    Fairley, Christopher K.
    Hocking, Jane S.
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2020, 75 (11) : 3109 - 3119
  • [25] Intramuscular olanzapine for agitated patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Kishi, Taro
    Matsunaga, Shinji
    Iwata, Nakao
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2015, 68 : 198 - 209
  • [26] Efficacy of corticosteroids for hand osteoarthritis-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Estee, Mahnuma Mahfuz
    Cicuttini, Flavia M.
    Page, Matthew J.
    Butala, Anant D.
    Wluka, Anita E.
    Hussain, Sultana Monira
    Wang, Yuanyuan
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [27] Efficacy and safety of ciprofol (HSK3486) for procedural sedation and anesthesia induction in surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wen, Jiaxuan
    Liu, Chen
    Ding, Xueying
    Tian, Zimeng
    Jiang, Wenyu
    Wei, Xiuhong
    Liu, Xin
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (12)
  • [28] The Safety of Yoga: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Cramer, Holger
    Ward, Lesley
    Saper, Robert
    Fishbein, Daniel
    Dobos, Gustav
    Lauche, Romy
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 182 (04) : 281 - 293
  • [29] Acupuncture for chloasma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Liang, Shuang
    Huang, Kai-Yu
    Xu, Yue-Ting
    Sun, Yi-Nong
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 14 : 37 - 45
  • [30] Aggressive versus controlled fluid resuscitation in acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    He Kun
    Gao Lin
    Yang Zihan
    Zhang Yuelun
    Hua Tianrui
    Hu Wenmo
    Wu Dong
    Ke Lu
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2023, 136 (10)