TRIO: An Entity Retrieval Method Using Entity Embedding and Topic Modeling

被引:0
作者
Park H. [1 ]
Woo D. [2 ]
Park S. [3 ]
Kim K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Electronics Technology Institute, Seoul
[2] Department of Computer Science, Yonsei University, Seoul
[3] Department of Artificial Intelligence, Yonsei University, Seoul
关键词
Deep learning; Entity embedding; Information retrieval; Knowledge graph; Knowledge service;
D O I
10.5626/JCSE.2024.18.1.36
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Current entity search models predominantly rely on term frequency and semantic similarity, often failing to fully exploit the information in the knowledge graphs. This limitation leads to the neglect of entities that could be highly relevant to the user’s query topics. To overcome these challenges and enhance entity retrieval, we introduce TRIO (Term, topic, and neural-based entity Retrieval Interpolate methOd), an entity retrieval method that employs multiple search perspectives for more relevant outcomes. TRIO stands out by seamlessly integrating three distinct search perspectives: term frequency, semantic similarity, and topic similarity. This integration is executed in a simple and effective manner, allowing TRIO to capture entities across multiple dimensions, resulting in comprehensive and accurate search results. Our experiments on the standard DBpedia-Entity V2 test collection demonstrate a substantial enhancement in the search performance of the baseline model. On average, TRIO improves NDCG and MAP performance by 12.401%, and 27.342%, respectively, compared to the best-performing baseline model. © (2024) The Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 46
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Chen X., Jia S., Xiang Y., A review: Knowledge reasoning over knowledge graph, Expert Systems with Applications, 141, (2020)
  • [2] Dalton J., Dietz L., Constructing query-specific knowledge bases, Proceedings of the 2013 Workshop on Automated Knowledge Base Construction (AKBC), pp. 55-0, (2013)
  • [3] Reinanda R., Meij E., de Rijke M., Knowledge graphs: an information retrieval perspective, Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 14, 4, pp. 289-444, (2020)
  • [4] Shekarpour S., Ngonga Ngomo A.C., Auer S., Question answering on interlinked data, Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 1145-1156, (2013)
  • [5] Pound J., Hudek A. K., Ilyas I. F., Weddell G., Interpreting keyword queries over web knowledge bases, Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 305-314, (2012)
  • [6] Tran T., Herzig D. M., Ladwig G., SemSearchPro: using semantics throughout the search process, Journal of Web Semantics, 9, 4, pp. 349-364, (2011)
  • [7] Tonon A., Demartini G., Cudre-Mauroux P., Combining inverted indices and structured search for ad-hoc object retrieval, Proceedings of the 35th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 125-134, (2012)
  • [8] Nikolaev F., Kotov A., Joint word and entity embeddings for entity retrieval from a knowledge graph, Advances in Information Retrieval, pp. 141-155, (2020)
  • [9] Nikas C., Fafalios P., Tzitzikas Y., Open domain question answering over knowledge graphs using keyword search, answer type prediction, SPARQL and pre-trained neural models, The Semantic Web–ISWC 2021, pp. 235-251, (2021)
  • [10] Jafarzadeh P., Ensan F., A semantic approach to postretrieval query performance prediction, Information Processing & Management, 59, 1, (2022)