Perspectives of medicine, human biology, and nursing undergraduates on transversal skills learning: a mixed-methods study

被引:0
|
作者
Fontana-Rosa, Nathalia Silva [1 ]
Paz, Luis Gonzalez-de [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Codina-Rodriguez, Ana C. [5 ]
Perez-Riart, Maria [5 ]
Carrio-Llach, Maria del Mar [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vic, Univ Cent Catalunya UVIC UCC, Campus Docent Sant Joan Deu, Sant Boi De Llobregat, Spain
[2] Consorci Atencio Primaria Salut Barcelona Esquerra, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Inst Invest Biomed August Pi i Sunyer IDIBAPS, Primary Healthcare Transversal Res Grp, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Univ Barcelona, Dept Publ Hlth Mental Hlth & Mother & Child Hlth, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Hosp Mar Parc Salut Mar, Nursing Dept, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Univ Politecn Catalunya UPC, Inst Educ Sci, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Real-world outcomes; Critical thinking; Higher education; Assessment; Transversal skills; FOCUS GROUP; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-025-06749-z
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
BackgroundIn health sciences practice, interpersonal skills, critical thinking, and learning-to-learn are crucial transversal skills. Effective teaching necessitates the understanding of undergraduates' views. This study explored undergraduate experiences in human biology, medicine, and nursing degrees in learning transversal skills. MethodsAn exploratory sequential mixed method design with qualitative data collection and a subsequent online survey study. Three focus groups were conducted with third- and fourth-year undergraduates, and data were analyzed with thematic analysis. The online survey targeted undergraduate students from all academic years to address inconclusive details. Analysis entailed descriptive statistics, and associations differences in responses by degrees were analyzed using chi-square tests or Fisher's Exact Test. ResultsThirteen undergraduates participated in focus groups and 159 in the online survey. Three thematic areas emerged: the training received and its perceived relevance, the evaluation, and the learning methods. Undergraduates expressed that transversal skills were necessary for self-personal growth and professional development; however 50.7% reported not receiving specific training. Human biology and medicine undergraduates reported less training in critical thinking compared to nursing (29.03% and 32.7% vs. 76%, p < 0.001) and in interpersonal and relational skills (16.1% and 16.3% vs. 57%, p < 0.001). Subjectivity is an issue compared to traditional testing, with 39.6% of undergraduates reporting knowing the assessment methods of transversal skills and 56% trusting the preparation of teaching staff. >80% of undegraduate students wanted more participatory methodologies -from classroom methodology to problem-based assessments and simulation, while plenary lectures and gamification were less preferred. ConclusionHealth sciences undergraduates advocated for effectively integrating transversal skills in their programs. Nursing undergraduates showed higher satisfaction and expressed having experienced more transversal skills learning than human biology and medicine undergraduates. Undergraduates required educators to receive more support and training in adopting methodologies that facilitate transversal skill acquisition through changes in the assessment methods and substantive transformation of the program curricula.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A mixed-methods study of interprofessional learning of resuscitation skills
    Bradley, Paul
    Cooper, Simon
    Duncan, Fiona
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2009, 43 (09) : 912 - 922
  • [2] Service Learning in the Nursing Bachelor Thesis: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Roca, Judith
    Gros Naves, Silvia
    Canet-Velez, Olga
    Torralbas-Ortega, Jordi
    Tort-Nasarre, Gloria
    Postic, Tijana
    Martinez, Laura
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (19)
  • [3] Nursing Students' Perceived Satisfaction with Flipped Learning Experiences: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Consuelo Saiz-Manzanares, Maria
    Carrillo, Celia
    Escolar Llamazares, Maria del Camino
    Rodriguez Arribas, Sandra
    Serrano Gomez, Diego
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (23)
  • [4] International nursing students and clinical learning environments: A convergent mixed-methods study
    Ivziku, Dhurata
    Badolamenti, Sondra
    Giannetta, Noemi
    Diaz, Maria Ymelda Tolentino
    Stievano, Alessandro
    D'Agostino, Fabio
    Abieyuwa, Abiola Courage
    Garcia, Jamie
    Latina, Roberto
    Lombardo, Rosario
    Cultrera, Miriam
    Durante, Angela
    Lommi, Marzia
    NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2024, 80
  • [5] Faculty perspectives on facilitating medical students' longitudinal learning: A mixed-methods study
    Shagrin, Bianca S.
    Gheihman, Galina
    Sullivan, Amy M.
    Li, Honghe
    Hirsh, David A.
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2022, 56 (10) : 1002 - 1016
  • [6] Advanced nursing practice in Europe A mixed-methods study
    Schirmer, Anne-Marie
    Golz, Christoph
    Eissler, Christian
    PRAVENTION UND GESUNDHEITSFORDERUNG, 2024,
  • [7] Delegation in School Nursing Practice: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Yoder, Claire L. McKinley
    Garrigues, Layla
    Smith, Jamie
    Valentine, Leslie
    Murphy, Catherine
    Mcgrew, Kristen
    JOURNAL OF SCHOOL NURSING, 2025,
  • [8] Effectiveness of Metaverse-Based Collaborative Learning in Nursing Education: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Yoo, Hye Jin
    Ryu, Hyeongju
    Lee, Hyeongsuk
    JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2024, 63 (09)
  • [9] Influence of Co-teaching on Undergraduate Student Learning: A Mixed-Methods Study in Nursing
    Lock, Jennifer
    Rainsbury, Jacqueline
    Clancy, Tracey
    Rosenau, Patricia
    Ferreira, Carla
    TEACHING & LEARNING INQUIRY-THE ISSOTL JOURNAL, 2018, 6 (01): : 38 - 51
  • [10] Patient and provider perspectives on the development of personalized medicine: a mixed-methods approach
    Puryear L.
    Downs N.
    Nevedal A.
    Lewis E.T.
    Ormond K.E.
    Bregendahl M.
    Suarez C.J.
    David S.P.
    Charlap S.
    Chu I.
    Asch S.M.
    Pakdaman N.
    Chang S.-I.
    Cullen M.R.
    Palaniappan L.
    Journal of Community Genetics, 2018, 9 (3) : 283 - 291