Regular human insulins versus rapid-acting insulin analogues in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis

被引:0
作者
Petersen, Johanne Juul [1 ,2 ]
Juul, Sophie [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Kamp, Caroline Barkholt [1 ,5 ]
Faltermeier, Pascal [1 ,5 ]
Sillassen, Christina Dam Bjerregaard [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Dos Santos, Tiago Jeronimo [7 ,8 ]
Jakobsen, Janus Christian [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Clin Intervent Res, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Copenhagen, Capital Reg Den, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Mental Hlth Serv Capital Reg Denmark, Mental Hlth Ctr Stolpegaard, Psychotherapeut Ctr Stolpegaard, Gentofte, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Psychol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Univ Southern Denmark, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Reg Hlth Res, Odense, Denmark
[6] Slagelse Hosp, Dept Cardiol & Endocrinol, Slagelse, Reg Zealand, Denmark
[7] Hosp Vithas Almeria, Inst Hispalense Pediat, Unit Pediat, Almeria, Spain
[8] Univ Almeria, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Nursing Physiotherapy & Med, Almeria, Spain
关键词
Type; 1; diabetes; Regular human insulins; Rapid-acting insulin analogues; Children; Adolescents; Meta-analysis; SURROGATE END-POINTS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; RISK; KETOACIDOSIS; PREVALENCE; DIAGNOSIS; CONSENSUS; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1186/s13643-024-02729-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundType 1 diabetes is a serious, chronic disorder with an increasing incidence among children and adolescents. Glycemic control in individuals with type 1 diabetes is better managed through a basal-bolus regimen with either regular human or rapid-acting insulin analogues administered as a bolus at mealtimes. Rapid-acting insulin analogues have been hypothesized to cause optimal glycemic control and less risk of hypoglycemic episodes compared to regular human insulins. However, this has never been systematically assessed in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Therefore, this systematic review aims to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of regular human insulins versus rapid-acting insulin analogues in children and adolescents.MethodsThis is a protocol for a systematic review. A search in major medical databases (e.g., MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL) and clinical trial registries will be performed by a search specialist. We will include published and unpublished randomized clinical trials comparing regular human insulins versus rapid-acting insulin analogues (lispro, aspart, or glulisine). Two review authors will independently extract data and conduct risk of bias assessments. Primary outcomes will be severe hypoglycemia, ketoacidosis, and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes will be quality of life, HbA1c, and non-serious adverse events. Data will be analyzed using fixed-effect meta-analyses, random-effects meta-analyses, and Trial Sequential Analysis. Several subgroup analyses are planned. Risk of bias will be assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool-version 2, an eight-step procedure will be used to assess if the thresholds for clinical significance are crossed, and the certainty of the evidence will be assessed by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE).DiscussionThe beneficial and adverse effects of regular human insulins versus rapid-acting insulin analogues have not been systematically assessed in children and adolescents. There is a need for a comprehensive systematic review of the current evidence.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO: CRD42024508625.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Diabetes, V37, P1113
[2]  
[Anonymous], TSA-trial sequential analysis: Copenhagen Trial Unit
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Use of Glycated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) in the Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus: Abbreviated Report of a WHO Consultation
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Guideline for good clinical practice E6 (R2)
[5]   ISPAD clinical practice consensus guidelines 2022: Stages of type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents [J].
Besser, Rachel E. J. ;
Bell, Kirstine J. ;
Couper, Jenny J. ;
Ziegler, Anette-G ;
Wherrett, Diane K. ;
Knip, Mikael ;
Speake, Cate ;
Casteels, Kristina ;
Driscoll, Kimberly A. ;
Jacobsen, Laura ;
Craig, Maria E. ;
Haller, Michael J. .
PEDIATRIC DIABETES, 2022, 23 (08) :1175-1187
[6]   ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Microvascular and macrovascular complications in children and adolescents with diabetes [J].
Bjornstad, Petter ;
Dart, Allison ;
Donaghue, Kim C. ;
Dost, Axel ;
Feldman, Eva L. ;
Tan, Gavin S. ;
Wadwa, R. Paul ;
Zabeen, Bedowra ;
Marcovecchio, M. Loredana .
PEDIATRIC DIABETES, 2022, 23 (08) :1432-1450
[7]   Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive-Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses [J].
Brok, Jesper ;
Thorlund, Kristian ;
Wetterslev, Jorn ;
Gluud, Christian .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 38 (01) :287-298
[8]   Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses [J].
Brok, Jesper ;
Thorlund, Kristian ;
Gluud, Christian ;
Wetterslev, Jorn .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 61 (08) :763-769
[9]   A core outcomes set for clinical trials of interventions for young adults with type 1 diabetes: an international, multi-perspective Delphi consensus study [J].
Byrne, Molly ;
O'Connell, Anthony ;
Egan, Aoife M. ;
Dinneen, Sean F. ;
Hynes, Lisa ;
O'Hara, Mary Clare ;
Holt, Richard I. G. ;
Willaing, Ingrid ;
Vallis, Michael ;
Hendrieckx, Christel ;
Coyne, Imelda .
TRIALS, 2017, 18
[10]   Infections in children with diabetes [J].
Calliari, Luis Eduardo ;
Almeida, Flavia J. ;
Noronha, Renata Maria .
JORNAL DE PEDIATRIA, 2020, 96 :39-46