Validation of the Forms of Bullying Scale-Perpetration (FBS-P) in the United States

被引:0
作者
Flowers J. [1 ]
Dawes J. [2 ]
Marr D. [1 ]
Cuitareo J. [1 ]
机构
[1] School Psychology Stephen F, Austin State University Nacogdoches, Nacogdoches, TX
[2] Department of Psychology Citadel Charleston, Charleston, SC
关键词
Bullying; Bullying assessment; Bullying measures; Factor analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s42380-023-00158-w
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Forms of Bullying Scale was introduced in 2013 and was normed with a large group of Australian students aged 12 to 15 (Shaw et al., 2013). To date, no researchers have attempted to validate FBS on adolescents in the United States. The purpose of this paper is to provide validation for the Forms of Bullying Scale – Perpetration (FBS-P; Shaw et al., 2013) in the United States. Despite no language differences, it is possible cross-cultural differences exist that would alter the psychometric properties of the measure when used with an American sample. Four hundred eighty-six adolescents ages 14–18 in the United States took the FBS-P through an online survey program and the shortened version of the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire (AQ; Bryant & Smith, 2001). Results and implications are discussed. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 244
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] The development and pilot testing of an adolescent bullying intervention in Indonesia- the ROOTS Indonesia program. Global Health Action, 12, 1, (2019)
  • [2] Bradshaw J., Crous G., Rees G., Turner N., Comparing children’s experiences of schools-based bullying across countries, Children and Youth Services Review, 80, pp. 171-180, (2017)
  • [3] Brown M.W., Cudeck R., Alternative ways of assessing model fit, Testing Structural Equation Models, pp. 136-162, (1993)
  • [4] Bryant F.B., Smith B.D., Refining the architecture of aggression: A measurement model for the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire, Journal of Research in Personality, 35, pp. 138-167, (2001)
  • [5] A cross-national profile of bullying and victimization among adolescents in 40 countries, International Journal of Public Health, 54, (2009)
  • [6] Espelage D., Swearer S.M., Research on school bullying and victimization: What have we learned and where do we go from here?, School Psychology Review, 32, 3, pp. 365-383, (2003)
  • [7] Authentic U.S. Government Information GPO, Federal Register.
  • [8] Felix E.D., Sharkey J.D., Green J.G., Furlong M.J., Tanigawa D., Getting precise and pragmatic about the assessment of bullying: The development of the California Bullying Victimization Scale, Aggressive Behavior, 37, 3, pp. 234-247, (2011)
  • [9] Ferguson C.J., An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers, Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40, pp. 532-538, (2009)
  • [10] ). Bullying Assessment: A Call for Increased Precision of Self-Reporting Procedures, Handbook of Bullying in Schools: An International Perspective., (2010)