Impact of ground-glass component on prognosis in early-stage lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy via Helical Tomotherapy

被引:0
作者
Ma, Jintao [1 ]
Fan, Shaonan [1 ]
Huang, Wenhan [1 ]
Xu, Xiaohong [1 ]
Hu, Yong [1 ]
He, Jian [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, 180 Fenglin Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
关键词
Early-stage lung cancer; Stereotactic body radiation therapy; GGO-component; Prognosis; ABLATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; RADIATION-THERAPY; LOCAL-CONTROL; SURVIVAL; OPACITY; TOXICITY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-024-02571-x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeThis study aims to investigate the prognostic impact of ground-glass opacity (GGO)-component in early-stage lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).MethodsFrom January 2013 to December 2022, 239 early-stage lung cancer patients (T1-2N0M0) underwent SBRT. They were categorized into two groups based on the presence of GGO-component: 65 patients in the subsolid group with a consolidation tumor ratio (CTR) between 0.25 and 1 and 174 patients in the solid group with a CTR of 1. Lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using Cox regression models for both univariate and multivariate analyses to identify prognostic factors. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was employed for adjusting confounding factors. Recurrence incidence was assessed using competing risk analysis and compared using Gray's test.ResultsIn the multivariate analysis, female, peripheral location, and subsolid nodules were favorable prognostic factors for LCSS; peripheral location, subsolid nodules, and adjuvant therapy were favorable prognostic factors for PFS. Between the subsolid (n = 65) and solid groups (n = 174), the median LCSS were not reached (p = 0.003), with 3-, 5-, and 9-year LCSS rates of 94.7% versus 80.3%, 90.9% versus 64.1%, 82.7% versus 53.5%, respectively. The median PFS were 72.5 months and 50.5 months (p = 0.030), with 3-, 5-, and 9-year PFS rates of 75.4% versus 61.2%, 56.6% versus 44.9%, 48.6% versus 23.3%, respectively. After stabilized IPTW (n = 240), the median LCSS were not reached (p = 0.024), with 3-, 5-, and 9-year LCSS rates of 94.0% versus 82.4%, 92.2% versus 67.7%, 85.3% versus 58.2%, respectively. The median PFS were 60.2 months and 50.5 months (p = 0.096), with 3-, 5-, and 9-year PFS rates of 73.8% versus 61.0%, 53.5% versus 46.2%, 46.8% versus 22.4%, respectively. The subsolid group had lower rates of locoregional recurrence (LRR) (10.4% vs. 25.9%, p = 0.035) and distant metastasis (DM) (17.1% vs. 37.9%, p = 0.064) compared to the solid group.ConclusionsThe presence of GGO-component in the lesion is an independent prognostic factor for LCSS and PFS. Subsolid nodules treated with SBRT demonstrated better prognosis, with significantly lower rates of local-regional recurrence. We should highlight GGO-component as a practical indicator for risk stratification of SBRT patients to guide treatment decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Outcomes of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Centrally Located Early-Stage Lung Cancer
    Haasbeek, Cornelis J. A.
    Lagerwaard, Frank J.
    Slotman, Ben J.
    Senan, Suresh
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 6 (12) : 2036 - 2043
  • [32] Prognositc significance of SUVmax on pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy: A meta-analysis
    Dong, Min
    Liu, Jing
    Sun, Xiaorong
    Xing, Ligang
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2017, 61 (05) : 652 - 659
  • [33] An optimal dose-fractionation for stereotactic body radiotherapy in peripherally, centrally and ultracentrally located early-stage non-small lung cancer
    Zarebska, Izabela
    Harat, Maciej
    THORACIC CANCER, 2023, 14 (28) : 2813 - 2820
  • [34] Impact of radiation dose to the immune system on disease progression and survival for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy
    Wang, Xiaofeng
    Bai, Hui
    Gao, Miaomiao
    Guan, Yong
    Yu, Lu
    Li, Junyi
    Dong, Yang
    Song, Yongchun
    Tao, Zhen
    Meng, Maobin
    Wu, Zhiqiang
    Zhao, Lujun
    Yuan, Zhiyong
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 186
  • [35] Alternatives to Surgery for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Stereotactic Radiotherapy
    Beaty, Brian T.
    Weiner, Ashley A.
    CLINICS IN CHEST MEDICINE, 2020, 41 (02) : 185 - +
  • [36] Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Early-Stage Lung Cancer
    Maquilan, Genevieve
    Timmerman, Robert
    CANCER JOURNAL, 2016, 22 (04) : 274 - 279
  • [37] Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for the Management of Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Clinical Overview
    Buchberger, David S.
    Videtic, Gregory M. M.
    JCO ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2023, 19 (05) : 239 - +
  • [38] DOSE-RESPONSE FOR STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHERAPY IN EARLY-STAGE NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG CANCER
    Olsen, Jeffrey R.
    Robinson, Clifford G.
    El Naqa, Issam
    Creach, Kimberly M.
    Drzymala, Robert E.
    Bloch, Charles
    Parikh, Parag J.
    Bradley, Jeffrey D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (04): : E299 - E303
  • [39] Factors associated with cavity formation after stereotactic body radiation therapy for peripheral early-stage lung cancer
    Maebayashi, Toshiya
    Ishibashi, Naoya
    Sakaguchi, Masakuni
    Aizawa, Takuya
    Sato, Akahiko
    Saito, Tsutomu
    Kawamori, Jiro
    Tanaka, Yoshiaki
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2024, 129 (03): : 507 - 514
  • [40] Prognostic Role Of Computed Tomography Textural Features In Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
    Zhang, Ran
    Wang, Changbin
    Cui, Kai
    Chen, Yicong
    Sun, Fenghao
    Sun, Xiaorong
    Xing, Ligang
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2019, 11 : 9921 - 9929