Strategies for integrating ChatGPT and generative AI into clinical studies

被引:1
作者
Lee, Jeong-Moo [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Div HBP Surg,Coll Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
关键词
Generative AI; Clinical Research; ChatGPT; Research Methodology; Academic Writing;
D O I
10.1007/s44313-024-00045-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Large language models, specifically ChatGPT, are revolutionizing clinical research by improving content creation and providing specific useful features. These technologies can transform clinical research, including data collection, analysis, interpretation, and results sharing. However, integrating these technologies into the academic writing workflow poses significant challenges. In this review, I investigated the integration of large-language model-based AI tools into clinical research, focusing on practical implementation strategies and addressing the ethical considerations associated with their use. Additionally, I provide examples of the safe and sound use of generative AI in clinical research and emphasize the need to ensure that AI-generated outputs are reliable and valid in scholarly writing settings. In conclusion, large language models are a powerful tool for organizing and expressing ideas efficiently; however, they have limitations. Writing an academic paper requires critical analysis and intellectual input from the authors. Moreover, AI-generated text must be carefully reviewed to reflect the authors' insights. These AI tools significantly enhance the efficiency of repetitive research tasks, although challenges related to plagiarism detection and ethical use persist.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], RECOMMENDATIONS COND
  • [2] anthropic, Anthropic. Introducing Claude
  • [3] Bader Raneem, 2024, Radiol Case Rep, V19, P2106, DOI 10.1016/j.radcr.2024.02.037
  • [4] ChatGPT in medicine: an overview of its applications, advantages, limitations, future prospects, and ethical considerations
    Dave, Tirth
    Athaluri, Sai Anirudh
    Singh, Satyam
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 6
  • [5] ABSTRACTS WRITTEN BY CHATGPT FOOL SCIENTISTS
    Else, Holly
    [J]. NATURE, 2023, 613 (7944) : 423 - 423
  • [6] Guidance for Authors, Peer Reviewers, and Editors on Use of AI, Language Models, and Chatbots
    Flanagin, Annette
    Kendall-Taylor, Jacob
    Bibbins-Domingo, Kirsten
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2023, 330 (08): : 702 - 703
  • [7] Publishers' and journals' instructions to authors on use of generative artificial intelligence in academic and scientific publishing: bibliometric analysis
    Ganjavi, Conner
    Eppler, Michael B.
    Pekcan, Asli
    Biedermann, Brett
    Abreu, Andre
    Collins, Gary S.
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    Cacciamani, Giovanni E.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 384
  • [8] GPTZero Performance in Identifying Artificial Intelligence-Generated Medical Texts: A Preliminary Study
    Habibzadeh, Farrokh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 38 (38)
  • [9] Haque M. A., 2024, AI Ethics, V2024, P1, DOI [10.1007/s43681-024-00435-4, DOI 10.1007/S43681-024-00435-4]
  • [10] Using AI to write scholarly publications
    Hosseini, Mohammad
    Rasmussen, Lisa M. M.
    Resnik, David B. B.
    [J]. ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY, 2024, 31 (07): : 715 - 723