Motor outcomes in individuals born small for gestational age at term: a systematic review

被引:0
作者
Taiar, Hoda [1 ]
Benum, Silje Dahl [2 ]
Aakvik, Kristina Anna Djupvik [2 ]
Evensen, Kari Anne I. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Trondheim, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Clin & Mol Med, Trondheim, Norway
[3] Trondheim Reg & Univ Hosp, St Olavs Hosp, Childrens Clin, Trondheim, Norway
[4] Oslo Metropolitan Univ, Dept Rehabil Sci & Hlth Technol, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Fetal growth restrction; Intrauterine growth restriction; Motor skills; Small for gestational age; Systematic review; LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT; INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RESTRICTION; CHILDREN BORN; NEURODEVELOPMENTAL DELAY; PRETERM; INFANTS; METAANALYSIS; BABIES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s12887-024-05187-y
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
BackgroundBeing born small for gestational age (SGA) is a risk factor for motor difficulties. Previous reviews exploring this topic are mostly focused on children born preterm. We aimed to review the literature to determine the association between being born SGA at term and motor outcomes.MethodsPubMed and Embase were searched for relevant articles without any restrictions on publication year or participants' age. Inclusion criteria were SGA exposure at term (>= 37 weeks of gestation), cohort studies or randomized controlled trials with motor outcome assessed by standardized motor tests with results reported as continuous scores (mean/median) compared with a control group. Exclusion criteria were abstracts, editorials and commentaries, articles in non-English language or no full text available. Reviews were screened for relevant articles. Quality of included studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.ResultsIn total, 674 records were identified by the literature search and screened by two independent authors. Thirteen original articles were eligible and included in a qualitative synthesis, and five (38%) of these were included in a meta-analysis. Nine (69%) studies were from high-income countries. Most studies were carried out in early childhood, and only one study in adulthood. Seven (54%) articles reported that individuals born SGA at term had poorer scores on standardized motor tests compared with controls, while no differences were reported in five (38%) articles. One article did not report p-values, although the differences were comparable to the other studies. Group differences were of small to moderate effect size (0.19 to 0.65 standard deviation units). The pooled effect size was -0.43 (95% confidence interval: -0.60 to -0.25). Adjustment for covariates were reported in seven (54%) articles and did not change the results. Proportions of motor difficulties, reported in five (38%) articles, ranged from 8.9 to 50% in individuals born SGA from infancy to adolescence.ConclusionsThis systematic review shows that being born SGA, also at term, may be a risk factor for poorer motor outcomes throughout childhood, confirmed by a meta-analysis in early childhood. Further research is needed to establish the risk of adult motor difficulties in individuals born SGA at term.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Cognitive, motor, behavioural and academic performances of children born preterm: a meta-analysis and systematic review involving 64 061 children
    Allotey, J.
    Zamora, J.
    Cheong-See, F.
    Kalidindi, M.
    Arroyo-Manzano, D.
    Asztalos, E.
    van der Post, J. A. M.
    Mol, B. W.
    Moore, D.
    Birtles, D.
    Khan, K. S.
    Thangaratinam, S.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 125 (01) : 16 - 25
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2002, Lafayette Instrument Grooved Pegboard Test User Instructions
  • [3] Neurodevelopmental delay in small babies at term: a systematic review
    Arcangeli, T.
    Thilaganathan, B.
    Hooper, R.
    Khan, K. S.
    Bhide, A.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 40 (03) : 267 - 275
  • [4] Bayley N., 2006, Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development®, V3rd, DOI DOI 10.1007/s10803-008-0593-3
  • [5] Bayley N., 1969, BAYLEY SCALES INFANT
  • [6] Reviewing retrieved references for inclusion in systematic reviews using EndNote
    Bramer, Wichor M.
    Milic, Jelena
    Mast, Frans
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, 2017, 105 (01) : 84 - 87
  • [7] Campbell SK., 2012, The test of infant motor performance: test User's manual version 3.0 for the TIMP version 5
  • [8] Campos Denise, 2008, Pediatr Phys Ther, V20, P340, DOI 10.1097/PEP.0b013e31818a0f78
  • [9] Motor Development in Very Preterm and Very Low-Birth-Weight Children From Birth to Adolescence A Meta-analysis
    de Kieviet, Jorrit F.
    Piek, Jan P.
    Aarnoudse-Moens, Cornelieke S.
    Oosterlaan, Jaap
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 302 (20): : 2235 - 2242
  • [10] Delis DC, 2001, APA PsycTests, DOI [10.1037/t15082-000, DOI 10.1037/T15082-000]