Ventilation-induced acute kidney injury in acute respiratory failure: Do PEEP levels matter?

被引:0
作者
Martín H. Benites [1 ]
Fernando Suarez-Sipmann [2 ]
Eduardo Kattan [3 ]
Pablo Cruces [4 ]
Jaime Retamal [5 ]
机构
[1] Unidad de Pacientes Críticos, Clínica Las Condes, Santiago
[2] Facultad de Medicina, Escuela de Medicina, Universidad Finis Terrae, Santiago
[3] Doctorado en Ciencias Médicas, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago
[4] Departamento de Medicina Intensiva, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago
[5] CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid
[6] Department of Intensive Care Medicine, La Princesa University Hospital, Madrid
[7] Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala
[8] Facultad de Ciencias de La Vida, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago
[9] Unidad de Paciente Crítico Pediátrico, Hospital El Carmen Dr. Luis Valentín Ferrada, Santiago
来源
Critical Care | / 29卷 / 1期
关键词
Acute kidney injury; Acute respiratory failure; Positive end-expiratory pressure; Venous congestion;
D O I
10.1186/s13054-025-05343-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among critically ill patients, and mechanical ventilation (MV) plays a critical role in its management. One of the key parameters of MV is the level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), which helps to maintain an adequate lung functional volume. However, the optimal level of PEEP remains controversial. The classical approach in clinical trials for identifying the optimal PEEP has been to compare “high” and “low” levels in a dichotomous manner. High PEEP can improve lung compliance and significantly enhance oxygenation but has been inconclusive in hard clinical outcomes such as mortality and duration of MV. This discrepancy could be related to the fact that inappropriately high or low PEEP levels may adversely affect other organs, such as the heart, brain, and kidneys, which could counteract its potential beneficial effects on the lung. Patients with ARDS often develop acute kidney injury, which is an independent marker of mortality. Three primary mechanisms have been proposed to explain lung-kidney crosstalk during MV: gas exchange abnormalities, such as hypoxemia and hypercapnia; remote biotrauma; and hemodynamic changes, including reduced venous return and cardiac output. As PEEP levels increase, lung volume expands to a variable extent depending on mechanical response. This dynamic underlies two potential mechanisms that could impair venous return, potentially leading to splanchnic and renal congestion. First, increasing PEEP may enhance lung aeration, particularly in highly recruitable lungs, where previously collapsed alveoli reopen, increasing lung volume and pleural pressure, leading to vena cava compression, which can contribute to systemic venous congestion and abdominal organ impairment function. Second, in lungs with low recruitability, PEEP elevation may induce minimal changes in lung volume while increasing airway pressure, resulting in alveolar overdistension, vascular compression, and increased pulmonary vascular resistance. Therefore, we propose that high PEEP settings can contribute to renal congestion, potentially impairing renal function. This review underscores the need for further rigorous research to validate these perspectives and explore strategies for optimizing PEEP settings while minimizing adverse renal effects. © The Author(s) 2025.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] van den Akker J.P., Egal M., Groeneveld A.B., Invasive mechanical ventilation as a risk factor for acute kidney injury in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Crit Care, 17, 3, (2013)
  • [2] Imai Y., Parodo J., Kajikawa O., de Perrot M., Fischer S., Edwards V., Et al., Injurious mechanical ventilation and end-organ epithelial cell apoptosis and organ dysfunction in an experimental model of acute respiratory distress syndrome, JAMA, 289, 16, pp. 2104-2112, (2003)
  • [3] Yang H., Benos P.V., Kitsios G.D., Protecting the lungs but hurting the kidneys: causal inference study for the risk of ventilation-induced kidney injury in ARDS, Ann Transl Med, 8, 16, (2020)
  • [4] Seubert M.E., Goeijenbier M., Controlled mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients and the potential role of venous bagging in acute kidney injury, J Clin Med, 13, 5, (2024)
  • [5] Caironi P., Cressoni M., Chiumello D., Ranieri M., Quintel M., Russo S.G., Et al., Lung opening and closing during ventilation of acute respiratory distress syndrome, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 181, 6, pp. 578-586, (2010)
  • [6] Retamal J., Bugedo G., Larsson A., Bruhn A., High PEEP levels are associated with overdistension and tidal recruitment/derecruitment in ARDS patients, Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, (2015)
  • [7] Nieman G.F., Al-Khalisy H., Kollisch-Singule M., Satalin J., Blair S., Trikha G., Et al., A physiologically informed strategy to effectively open, stabilize, and protect the acutely injured lung, Front Physiol, 11, (2020)
  • [8] Sahetya S.K., Goligher E.C., Brower R.G., Fifty years of research in ARDS. Setting positive end expiratory pressure in acute respiratory distress syndrome, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 195, 11, pp. 1429-1438, (2017)
  • [9] Brower R.G., Lanken P.N., MacIntyre N., Matthay M.A., Morris A., Ancukiewicz M., Et al., Higher versus lower positive end-expiratory pressures in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome, N Engl J Med, 351, 4, pp. 327-336, (2004)
  • [10] Mercat A., Richard J.C.M., Vielle B., Jaber S., Osman D., Diehl J.L., Et al., Positive end-expiratory pressure setting in adults with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial, JAMA, 299, 6, pp. 646-655, (2008)