Italian adaptation and psychometric analysis of the moral foundations questionnaire 2

被引：0

作者：

Frisari, Francesca Valeria ^{[1
]}

Bonora, Matteo ^{[1
]}

Parisse, Chiara ^{[1
]}

Livi, Stefano ^{[1
]}

Kosic, Ankica ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Psychol Dev & Socializat Proc, Via Marsi 78, I-00185 Rome, Italy

来源：

CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY | 2025年

关键词：

Moral foundations theory; Moral foundations questionnaire; Psychometric analysis; Scale adaptation; Attitudes; Morality; OF-FIT INDEXES; INTUITIVE ETHICS; COVARIANCE; VALUES;

D O I：

10.1007/s12144-025-07310-3

中图分类号：

B84 [心理学];

学科分类号：

04 ; 0402 ;

摘要：

Within the framework of Moral Foundations Theory (MFT; Haidt & Graham, Social Justice Research, 20(1), 98-116, 2007; Haidt & Joseph, Daedalus, 133(4), 55-66, 2004), the aim of the present study is to adapt and discuss the psychometric features of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire 2 (MFQ-2; Atari et al., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2023) in the Italian context. Utilizing a sample of 947 Italian adults, a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was conducted, which confirmed the six-factor solution initially proposed for the MFQ-2. Each moral foundation demonstrated acceptable reliability, underscoring the robustness of the questionnaire's internal consistency. Correlation analyses between the MFQ-2 and MFQ-1 dimensions indicate a significant consistency across the dimensions of both versions, affirming the convergent validity of the MFQ-2. Additionally, Multi-Group Confirmatory Analyses (MGCFAs) indicated that the MFQ-2 exhibits configural invariance across genders. Despite several limitations, this study provides precious insights into the adaptation process of the MFQ-2 for the Italian cultural context, contributing to a broader understanding of the MFT in Italy.

引用

页码：2237 / 2246

页数：10

共 52 条

[41]

Mtayer S., 2014, Revue Internationale De Psychologie Sociale, V27, P79

[42] The Moral Foundations taxonomy: Structural validity and relation to political ideology in Sweden [J].

Nilsson, Artur ;

Erlandsson, Arvid .

PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2015, 76 :28-32

[43] What do I Think of Others in Relation to Myself? Moral Identity and Moral Inclusion in Explaining Prejudice [J].

Passini, Stefano .

JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY & APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 23 (03) :261-269

[44]

R Core Team, 2022, R LANG ENV STAT COMP

[45] Moral Psychology Is Relationship Regulation: Moral Motives for Unity, Hierarchy, Equality, and Proportionality [J].

Rai, Tage Shakti ;

Fiske, Alan Page .

PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2011, 118 (01) :57-75

[46] lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling [J].

Rosseel, Yves .

JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2012, 48 (02) :1-36

[47] UNIVERSALS IN THE CONTENT AND STRUCTURE OF VALUES - THEORETICAL ADVANCES AND EMPIRICAL TESTS IN 20 COUNTRIES [J].

SCHWARTZ, SH .

ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 25 :1-65

[48]

Shweder R.A., 1997, MORALITY HLTH

[49] All Things Being Equal: Distinguishing Proportionality and Equity in Moral Reasoning [J].

Skurka, Chris ;

Winett, Liana B. ;

Jarman-Miller, Hannah ;

Niederdeppe, Jeff .

SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE, 2020, 11 (03) :374-387

[50] Intuitive Ethics and Political Orientations: Testing Moral Foundations as a Theory of Political Ideology [J].

Smith, Kevin B. ;

Alford, John R. ;

Hibbing, John R. ;

Martin, Nicholas G. ;

Hatemi, Peter K. .

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 61 (02) :424-437

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 →