Predictive ability of frailty scores in surgically managed patients with traumatic spinal injuries: a TQIP analysis

被引:0
作者
Forssten, Maximilian Peter [1 ,2 ]
Ekestubbe, Lovisa [1 ]
Cao, Yang [3 ]
Ismail, Ahmad Mohammad [1 ,2 ]
Ioannidis, Ioannis [1 ,2 ]
Sarani, Babak [4 ]
Mohseni, Shahin [2 ]
机构
[1] Orebro Univ Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, S-70185 Orebro, Sweden
[2] Orebro Univ, Sch Med Sci, S-70281 Orebro, Sweden
[3] Orebro Univ, Fac Med & Hlth, Sch Med Sci, Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, S-70182 Orebro, Sweden
[4] George Washington Univ, Ctr Trauma & Crit Care, Washington, DC USA
关键词
Traumatic spinal injury; Frailty; Orthopedic frailty score; Modified frailty index; Hospital frailty risk score; Johns Hopkins frailty indicator; Mortality; Morbidity; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; EYEBALL TEST; MORTALITY; MORBIDITY; INDEX; AREAS;
D O I
10.1007/s00068-025-02775-0
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
PurposeFrailty has gained recognition as a crucial determinant of patient outcomes following traumatic spinal injury (TSI), particularly due to its increasing incidence in elderly populations. The aim of the current investigation was therefore to compare the ability of several frailty scores to predict adverse outcomes in surgically managed isolated TSI patients without spinal cord injury.MethodsAll adult patients (18 years or older) who suffered an isolated TSI due to blunt trauma, and required surgical management, were extracted from the 2013-2021 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database. The ability of the Orthopedic Frailty Score (OFS), the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS), the 11-factor (11-mFI) and 5-factor (5-mFI) modified frailty index, as well as the Johns Hopkins Frailty Indicator to predict adverse outcomes was compared based on the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC). Subgroup analyses were also performed on patients who were >= 65 years old and those who were injured due to a ground-level fall (GLF).ResultsA total of 39,449 patients were selected from the TQIP database. The 5-mFI and 11-mFI outperformed all other frailty scores when predicting in-hospital mortality (5-mFI AUC: 0.73) (11-mFI AUC: 0.73), any complication (5-mFI AUC: 0.65) (11-mFI AUC: 0.65), and FTR (5-mFI AUC: 0.75) (11-mFI AUC: 0.75). Among the 14,257 geriatric patients, however, the OFS demonstrated the highest predictive ability for in-hospital mortality (AUC: 0.65). The OFS (AUC: 0.64) also performed on the same level as both the 5-mFI (AUC: 0.63) and the 11-mFI (AUC: 0.63) when predicting FTR in this population. Among the 9616 patients who were injured due to a GLF, the OFS performed on par with the 5-mFI and 11-mFI when predicting in-hospital mortality and FTR.ConclusionSimpler scores like the 5-factor modified Frailty Index and Orthopedic Frailty Score outperform or perform on par with more complicated frailty scores when predicting mortality, complications, and failure-to-rescue in surgically managed isolated traumatic spinal injury patients without spinal cord injury, particularly among geriatric patients and those injured in a GLF.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Prospective Evaluation of the Eyeball Test for Assessing Frailty in Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
    Ahmed, Aisha
    Sorajja, Paul
    Pai, Akila
    Plimpton, Nicholas
    Bae, Richard
    Pedersen, Wesley A.
    Tindell, Lisa
    Farivar, R. Saeid
    Harris, Kevin
    Gossl, Mario
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 68 (25) : 2911 - 2912
  • [2] [Anonymous], ACG System version 11. 0 Technical Reference Guide
  • [3] Orthopaedic surgeons' perceptions of frailty and frailty screening
    Archibald, Mandy M.
    Lawless, Michael
    Gill, Tiffany K.
    Chehade, Mellick J.
    [J]. BMC GERIATRICS, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [4] Avila MJ, 2023, Nonoperative versus operative management of type II odontoid fracture in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • [5] Prehabilitation in Frail Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review
    Baimas-George, Maria
    Watson, Michael
    Elhage, Sharbel
    Parala-Metz, Armida
    Vrochides, Dionisios
    Davis, Bradley R.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 44 (11) : 3668 - 3678
  • [6] Effect of Frailty on Outcome after Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury
    Banaszek, Dan
    Inglis, Tom
    Marion, Travis E.
    Charest-Morin, Raphaele
    Moskven, Eryck
    Rivers, Carly S.
    Kurban, Dilnur
    Flexman, Alana M.
    Ailon, Tamir
    Dea, Nicolas
    Kwon, Brian K.
    Paquette, Scott
    Fisher, Charles G.
    Dvorak, Marcel F.
    Street, John T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2020, 37 (06) : 839 - 845
  • [7] Bowers CA, 2023, Comparison of the Risk Analysis Index and the modified 5-factor frailty index in predicting 30-day morbidity and mortality after spine surgery
  • [8] Risk Analysis Index and Its Recalibrated Version Predict Postoperative Outcomes Better Than 5-Factor Modified Frailty Index in Traumatic Spinal Injury
    Conlon, Matthew
    Thommen, Rachel
    Kazim, Syed Faraz
    Dicpinigaitis, Alis J.
    Schmidt, Meic H.
    McKee, Rohini G.
    Bowers, Christian A.
    [J]. NEUROSPINE, 2022, 19 (04) : 1039 - +
  • [9] COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH
    DELONG, ER
    DELONG, DM
    CLARKEPEARSON, DI
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) : 837 - 845
  • [10] Impact of Frailty on Morbidity and Mortality in Adult Patients Presenting with an Acute Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
    Elsamadicy, Aladine A.
    Sandhu, Mani Ratnesh S.
    Freedman, Isaac G.
    Reeves, Benjamin C.
    Koo, Andrew B.
    Hengartner, Astrid
    Havlik, John
    Sherman, Josiah
    Maduka, Richard
    Agboola, Isaac K.
    Johnson, Dirk C.
    Kolb, Luis
    Laurans, Maxwell
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 153 : E408 - E418