Evaluating Financial Incentives as a Tool to Increase Medication Adherence for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:0
作者
Winberg, Debra [1 ]
Tang, Tiange [1 ]
Ramsey, Zachary [2 ]
Bazzano, Alessandra N. [3 ]
Nauman, Elizabeth [4 ]
Li, Jian [5 ]
Lin, Yilu [1 ]
Shi, Lizheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Tulane Univ Celia, Scott Weatherhead Sch Publ Hlth & Trop Med, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, 1440 Canal St, Suite 1900, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
[2] Tulane Univ, Sch Med, 1430 Tulane Ave, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
[3] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Maternal & Child Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] Louisiana Publ Hlth Inst, 400 Poydras St, Suite 1250, New Orleans, LA 70130 USA
[5] Tulane Univ Celia, Scott Weatherhead Sch Publ Hlth & Trop Med, Dept Biostat, 1440 Canal St, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
关键词
Adherence; Financial incentives; Type 2 diabetes mellitus; Systematic review; INSURANCE DESIGN; DRUG UTILIZATION; IMPACT; CARE; OUTCOMES; PROGRAM; ASSOCIATION; DISEASES; QUALITY; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1007/s13300-025-01694-y
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a common chronic disease with high rates of complications. Although there are successful treatments, rates of medication non-adherence remain high. This study aims to evaluate the impact of financial incentives on medication adherence in people living with T2DM. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were searched via the terms "medication adherence," "diabetes," and "financial/economic incentive." Data on study characteristics, incentive type, and impact were extracted. The outcome measures included the proportion of days covered (PDC), mean possession ratio (MPR), percent adherent (PDC/MPR > 80%), and others. Two pooled Bayesian meta-analyses were conducted, analyzing the mean differences in PDC or MPR and the percentage of adherent patients (MPR > 80%). Results: The search yielded 8244 results with 126 full-text articles reviewed. In total, 22 studies that met the inclusion criteria were included. Among these 22 studies, 16 reported that financial incentives significantly increased medication adherence in all, four reported that they did not lead to significant changes in adherence, and two studies reported differing results per subgroup. For the pooled meta-analyses, the effect of financial incentives on percent adherent was significant in three studies (weighted Cohen's D: 0.03, P = 0.02) and in the ten studies assessed PDC/MPR, financial incentives significantly increased adherence (weighted Cohen's D: 0.02, 95%, P < 0.01). Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that financial incentives lead to statistically significant but possibly clinically irrelevant increases in medication adherence for patients living with T2DM.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 545
页数:19
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [21] Patient preferences for medication adherence financial incentive structures: A discrete choice experiment
    Hohmann, Natalie S.
    Hastings, Tessa J.
    Jeminiwa, Ruth N.
    Qian, Jingjing
    Hansen, Richard A.
    Ngorsuraches, Surachat
    Garza, Kimberly B.
    [J]. RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2021, 17 (10) : 1800 - 1809
  • [22] Improving the usefulness of a tool for appraising the quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies, the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT)
    Hong, Quan Nha
    Gonzalez-Reyes, Araceli
    Pluye, Pierre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 24 (03) : 459 - 467
  • [23] Impact of financial medication assistance on medication adherence: a systematic review
    Hung, Anna
    Blalock, Dan, V
    Miller, Julie
    McDermott, Jaime
    Wessler, Hannah
    Oakes, Megan M.
    Reed, Shelby D.
    Bosworth, Hayden B.
    Zullig, Leah L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2021, 27 (07) : 924 - 935
  • [24] Comparison of Different Strategies to Measure Medication Adherence via Claims Data in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
    Ihle, Peter
    Krueger, Katrin
    Schubert, Ingrid
    Griese-Mammen, Nina
    Parrau, Natalie
    Laufs, Ulrich
    Schulz, Martin
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 106 (01) : 211 - 218
  • [25] The impact of financial incentives on the implementation of asthma or diabetes self-management: A systematic review
    Jackson, Tracy
    Shields, Michael D.
    Heaney, Liam G.
    Kendall, Marilyn
    Pearce, Christina J.
    Hui, Chi Yan
    Pinnock, Hilary
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (11):
  • [26] Individuals' preference for financial over social incentives for medication adherence
    Jeminiwa, Ruth
    Hohmann, Natalie S.
    Hastings, Tessa J.
    Hansen, Richard
    Qian, Jingjing
    Garza, Kimberly B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION, 2022, 62 (01) : 134 - +
  • [27] Cost-related medication non-adherence among US adults with diabetes
    Kang, Hyojung
    Lobo, Jennifer Mason
    Kim, Soyoun
    Sohn, Min-Woong
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 143 : 24 - 33
  • [28] Effect of Out-of-Pocket Cost on Medication Initiation, Adherence, and Persistence among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: The Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE)
    Karter, Andrew J.
    Parker, Melissa M.
    Solomon, Matthew D.
    Lyles, Courtney R.
    Adams, Alyce S.
    Moffet, Howard H.
    Reed, Mary E.
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 53 (02) : 1227 - 1247
  • [29] Kim NH, 2019, J MANAG CARE SPEC PH, V25, P1432, DOI 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.12.1432
  • [30] Do physician incentives increase patient medication adherence?
    Kong, Edward
    Beshears, John
    Laibson, David
    Madrian, Brigitte
    Volpp, Kevin
    Loewenstein, George
    Kolstad, Jonathan
    Choi, James J.
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 55 (04) : 503 - 511