Outcomes of intramedullary nailing versus plate fixation for humeral shaft fractures: a retrospective cohort study

被引:0
作者
Derbas, Jawad [1 ]
Moghamis, Isam [1 ]
Alzobi, Osama [1 ]
Elshoeibi, Amgad [2 ]
Murshid, Abdullah [1 ]
Ahmed, Ghalib [1 ]
机构
[1] Hamad Gen Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Doha, Qatar
[2] Qatar Univ, Coll Med, QU Hlth, Doha, Qatar
关键词
Humerus shaft; Fracture; DCP; IMN; Functional outcome; NONOPERATIVE TREATMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00590-025-04181-z
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Humeral shaft fractures account for 1-3% of all bone fractures. Conservative treatment often leads to complications such as non-union and shoulder stiffness. Surgical fixation with a dynamic compression plate (DCP) has been the gold standard treatment. Intramedullary nailing (IMN) has recently gained popularity due to its minimally invasive approach and reduced risk of radial nerve injury. This study aims to compare the outcomes of IMN and plate fixation for humeral shaft fractures. Methods This retrospective study included patients with humeral shaft fractures treated with either IMN or DCP fixation at Hamad General Hospital between April 2015 and October 2018. Patient demographics, fracture characteristics, surgical outcomes, and complications were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient information, and univariate analysis was conducted to compare both groups. A Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted for age, gender, and polytrauma status was applied to compare time to union between IMN and DCP groups. Results Sixty five patients (25 IMN, 40 plate fixation) were included. Non-union rates were higher in the DCP group than in the IMN group (13% vs. 4%). Reoperation rates were also higher in the DCP group (20% vs. 4%). Postoperative neuropathy rates were 4% for IMN and 10% for DCP, with neuropathy resolution significantly higher in the IMN group (92% vs. 68%). Shoulder range of motion (ROM) and pain favored the DCP group, with 98% unaffected ROM in the plate group compared to 76% in the IMN group (p = 0.007), and a lower incidence of shoulder pain (28% vs. 98%, p < 0.001). Time to union was comparable between both groups, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.08 (95% CI 0.62-1.90; p = 0.776). Conclusion IMN and plate fixation effectively achieved fracture union; however, plate fixation was associated with better shoulder function, reduced pain, and higher reoperation rates. IMN was linked to a lower risk of nerve injury but compromised shoulder ROM and resulted in more postoperative pain.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Safety and Efficacy of Conversion from External Fixation to Plate Fixation in Humeral Shaft Fractures
    Suzuki, Takashi
    Hak, David J.
    Stahel, Philip F.
    Morgan, Steven J.
    Smith, Wade R.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2010, 24 (07) : 414 - 419
  • [22] Suprapatellar versus Infrapatellar Approach for Intramedullary Nailing in Tibial Shaft Fractures: A Prospective Interventional Study
    Sahni, Girish
    Singh, Sukhjot
    Kavia, Ashish
    Aggarwal, Hari Om
    Chawla, Harjit K. Singh
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2023, 17 (01) : RC1 - RC4
  • [23] Systematic review: Functional outcomes and complications of intramedullary nailing versus plate fixation for both-bone diaphyseal forearm fractures in children
    Patel, Akash
    Li, Lily
    Anand, Amarjit
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2014, 45 (08): : 1135 - 1143
  • [24] Plate osteosynthesis versus intramedullary nailing for both forearm bones fractures
    Lee S.K.
    Kim K.J.
    Lee J.W.
    Choy W.S.
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2014, 24 (5) : 769 - 776
  • [25] Plate fixation versus intramedullary nailing of completely displaced midshaft fractures of the clavicle A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Fuglesang, H. F. S.
    Flugsrud, G. B.
    Randsborg, P. H.
    Oord, P.
    Benth, J. S.
    Utvag, S. E.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2017, 99B (08) : 1095 - 1101
  • [26] Surgical treatment options of displaced midshaft fractures of the clavicle in young adults: plate fixation versus intramedullary nailing
    Kim, Ji Un
    Yoon, Ji Young
    Park, Hyung Jun
    Park, Jung Ho
    CLINICS IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW, 2024, 27 (04): : 447 - 453
  • [27] Malunion after intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures
    Kyro, A
    ANNALES CHIRURGIAE ET GYNAECOLOGIAE, 1997, 86 (01) : 56 - 64
  • [28] Healing process after rigid plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures revisited
    Yi, Ju Won
    Oh, Jong-Keon
    Han, Seung-Beom
    Shin, Sang-Jin
    Oh, Chang-Wug
    Yoon, Yong-Cheol
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2013, 133 (06) : 811 - 817
  • [29] Management of the mid-shaft clavicle fractures using plate fixation versus intramedullary fixation: an updated meta-analysis
    Zhu, Yanbin
    Tian, Ye
    Dong, Tianhua
    Chen, Wei
    Zhang, Fei
    Zhang, Yingze
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 39 (02) : 319 - 328
  • [30] Open distal tibial shaft fractures: a retrospective comparison of medial plate versus nail fixation
    Avilucea, F. R.
    Sathiyakumar, V.
    Greenberg, S. E.
    Ghiam, M.
    Thakore, R. V.
    Francois, E.
    Benvenuti, M. A.
    Siuta, M.
    Smith, A. K.
    Ehrenfeld, J. M.
    Evans, J. M.
    Obremskey, W. T.
    Sethi, M. K.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2016, 42 (01) : 101 - 106